Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Construction, Maintenance & Refit
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 14-08-2013, 16:57   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Boat: Raven 26
Posts: 27
Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

Hi - I'm interested in finding out more about the pros/cons of encapsulated vs. bolt on keels and was wondering if anyone could help out or if there is already a discussion on this topic. I'm new to this forum and not sure if this the right place or way to post my query so apologies in advance if this isn't the right place to post.

Thanks in advance for any help you guys can give.

Ellen
__________________
Ellen Bumblebee
https://thecynicalsailor.blogspot.com
Ellen Bumblebee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2013, 17:05   #2
Senior Cruiser
 
boatman61's Avatar

Community Sponsor
Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 30,641
Images: 2
pirate Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

Hi Ellen...Welcome to CF.
Bolt On's fall off... Encapsulated don't...
But someone likely knows one that fell through...
__________________


You can't beat a people up (for 75yrs+) and have them say..
"I Love You.. ". Murray Roman.
Yet the 'useful idiots' of the West still dance to the beat of the apartheid drums.
boatman61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2013, 17:38   #3
Registered User
 
sabray's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wash DC
Boat: PETERSON 44
Posts: 3,165
Come on now. True encapsulated usually means is at least modified long keel. Pretty bulllet proof but builders have figured our how to screw these up too. Good bolt on with good glass and engineered grid or backers is just fine. Question is to generic. It's boat build specific.
sabray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2013, 17:44   #4
Registered User
 
Andrew B.'s Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 347
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

Almond Joy has nuts, mounds don't.

I have both types on my short list, but I trust the builders.

Do your due diligence.

I am going with the one that has enough room for twin turbo charged volvos.
Andrew B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2013, 17:54   #5
Senior Cruiser
 
skipmac's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 29° 49.16’ N 82° 25.82’ W
Boat: Pearson 422
Posts: 16,306
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

I have owned both and all other things being equal would prefer the encapsulated keel. But as previous posts imply, it would depend on the boat. You can find cheaply made boats with encapsulated keels and well made boats with bolt ons.

I had a well made boat with bolt on and was never worried about it falling off but every time I hauled the boat there was a small crack showing where the keel met the glass that annoyed me and I did wonder if long term the moisture in the crack might corrode the keel bolts and eventually weaken them.

By the way my encapsulated keel is a modified fin keel.
__________________
The water is always bluer on the other side of the ocean.
Sometimes it's necessary to state the obvious for the benefit of the oblivious.
Rust is the poor man's Loctite.
skipmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2013, 17:56   #6
Registered User
 
sabray's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wash DC
Boat: PETERSON 44
Posts: 3,165
Volvo sucks thank god they have nothing to do with keels.
sabray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2013, 18:03   #7
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle
Boat: Cal 40 (sold). Still have a Hobie 20
Posts: 2,945
Images: 7
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by sabray View Post
Come on now. True encapsulated usually means is at least modified long keel. Pretty bulllet proof but builders have figured our how to screw these up too. Good bolt on with good glass and engineered grid or backers is just fine. Question is to generic. It's boat build specific.
Excalibur Islander 26, Caravel Bristol 22, Cal 34, Cal 40, Cal 25 are fin keel encapsulated off of the top of my head.

Good boats are built of each kind.

Encapsulated: no keelbolts to worry about, space for storage, and tankage, deep sump for bilge water to not swirl around your ankles.

Bolt on: more weight down low and less wetted surface. Advocates say lead just dents instead of needing fiberglass repair, but I've seen boats that needed repair where the stub meets the hull after hitting. Though same is true of some encapsulated where the keel turns into the hull.
cal40john is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2013, 18:14   #8
Registered User
 
Andrew B.'s Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 347
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by sabray View Post
Volvo sucks thank god they have nothing to do with keels.
Wrong, and wrong...swing batter...
Andrew B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2013, 18:26   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between the devil and the deep blue sea
Boat: a sailing boat
Posts: 20,437
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

I do not like encapsulated when it is iron. Lead no issues, possibly a set-up of choice, if not that we have a bolted-on iron already ;-(

b.
barnakiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2013, 18:39   #10
Senior Cruiser
 
skipmac's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 29° 49.16’ N 82° 25.82’ W
Boat: Pearson 422
Posts: 16,306
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by barnakiel View Post
I do not like encapsulated when it is iron. Lead no issues, possibly a set-up of choice, if not that we have a bolted-on iron already ;-(

b.
Good point to bring up. Encapsulated iron does have potential to be a problem. Mine is lead.
__________________
The water is always bluer on the other side of the ocean.
Sometimes it's necessary to state the obvious for the benefit of the oblivious.
Rust is the poor man's Loctite.
skipmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2013, 19:14   #11
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montegut LA.
Boat: Now we need to get her to Louisiana !! she's ours
Posts: 3,421
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

I like lead or concrete, Incapsulated of course. I added concrete, because it can be removed if needed, and replaced.
__________________
Bob and Connie
bobconnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-08-2013, 06:18   #12
Resin Head
 
minaret's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle WA
Boat: Nauticat
Posts: 7,205
Images: 52
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

I've seen more problems with encapsulated than bolt on, and more severe ones too. A bolt on is easy to work on and generally made of quality stuff, of necessity. Most builders seem to view encapsulated as a liscence to pour just about anything in the keel cavity and call it ballast. I've done many major repairs on encapsulated. Water ingress occurs, either due to an impact or poor glass work in the bilge, then expansion occurs due to freezing water or swelling rusting iron ballast, this causes the hull to crack, and you have a major nightmare repair. I'd rather rebolt a bolt on any day. I've seen everything from ballast made out of pachinko balls to keel cavities full of ancient raw sewage. No fun.
__________________
O you who turn the wheel and look to windward,

Consider Phlebas, who was once handsome and tall as you.
minaret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-08-2013, 06:53   #13
Moderator
 
noelex 77's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jul 2007
Boat: Bestevaer.
Posts: 14,678
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

This is the order IMHO from best to worst.

Encapsulated with lead ballast
Bolt on keel with lead ballast
Bolt on iron keel
Encapsulated keel with any iron/steel ballast

Good materials/methods should be at the top of the list when choosing a yacht.
noelex 77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-08-2013, 06:58   #14
Nearly an old salt
 
goboatingnow's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lefkas Marina ,Greece
Boat: Bavaria 36
Posts: 22,801
Images: 3
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

Id agree with minaret, encapsulated keels , irrespective of ballast material, have too many hidden voids and potential water entrapment, especially if damaged. Also I have seen bilge water make its way into such voids and cause expansion and frost issues when laid up, Its very common to see water pour from encapsulated keels on older boats. Its also often very difficult to ascertain actually whats in encapsulated keels.

dave
__________________
Interested in smart boat technology, networking and all things tech
goboatingnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-08-2013, 07:16   #15
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,462
Images: 241
Re: Encapsulated vs. Bolt On Keels - Pros/Cons

Greetings and welcome aboard the CF, Ellen.
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
enc, keel


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 14:14.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.