Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-03-2013, 15:54   #166
Moderator Emeritus
 
Hudson Force's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lived aboard & cruised for 45 years,- now on a chair in my walk-in closet.
Boat: Morgan OI 413 1973 - Aythya
Posts: 8,492
Images: 1
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

Anchors are for holding........ anchors are for marketing......... It's a floor wax......no, it's a dessert topping........ it's both! Watch out!
__________________
Take care and joy, Aythya crew
Hudson Force is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 16:02   #167
Moderator
 
Jim Cate's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: cruising SW Pacific
Boat: Jon Sayer 1-off 46 ft fract rig sloop strip plank in W Red Cedar
Posts: 21,466
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hydra View Post
I took the time to read the part of USLC section 13 about anchors. It says:
"The masses given are for Admiralty Pattern Stockless anchors with an assumed holding power of 3 times their own mass.

The Authority may allow approved high-holding-power anchors to be carried at the owner's request, and shl allow a reduction of 30 percent of the specified anchor mass, where such anchors are used. Approved high-holding-power anchors shall be those anchors having a holding power at least double that of Admiralty Pattern Stockless anchors, ie. high- holding-power anchors must have holding power at least 6 times their own mass."
All average-to-good quality anchors used on yachts have holding power much greater than 6 times their mass. For example, in Yachting Monthly Nov 09 test, the Britany 16kg (35lb) anchor held 446kg (982lb) in muddy sand. That's more than 27 times its mass and the result was considered rather poor by comparison with other anchors.

IMO, the authors of USLC had a very pessimistic opinion of anchor performance. Perhaps is it not necessary any more to follow it closely.

Alain
G'Day all,

Alain, I also read that section of the code and was perplexed yet again!

As I mentioned previously, the code recommendation for our boat was a 45 Kg "regular" anchor. Using their formula, that would provide 135 Kg of "holding power". I don't own a strain gage or load cell, but I have watched our 16 mm double braid nylon snubber stretch like a rubber band (oh, ok, that's hyperbole, but it does stretch a couple of feet) when anchored in gusty 45 knot winds. I firmly believe that our boat can and does exceed 135 kg loads on the ground tackle at well below the code's 60 knot standard.

How, then am I to put much credence in these standards ? Either they grossly underestimate the anchor loads or they actually believe that the holding power of a stockless anchor is far greater than three times its mass.

For Conger (and I find many of your comments about anchor design to be interesting and informative BTW): You suggest that if I was to approach an expert from the classification societies he would figure out my requirements for an anchor. I'm curious as to what he would use to do so when the code itself fails to provide guidance for sailing yachts and their particular windage situation. Would he (if I were to be applying for survey approval) use an unapproved method?

In actual fact, these questions are hypothetical. I'm happy with my (more or less) normal sized MS anchor and don't really care what the official code is. But my native curiosity is tweaked when folks start extolling the code as an ultimate authority.

Thanks to all for an interesting and relatively dispassionate anchor thread!

Cheers,

Jim
__________________
Jim and Ann s/v Insatiable II, lying Port Cygnet Tasmania once again.
Jim Cate is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 16:16   #168
Registered User
 
DumnMad's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Nelson NZ; boat in Port Stephens, NSW.
Boat: 45ft Ketch
Posts: 1,562
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonJo View Post
What science?
Geotechnic or soil science, comparing different soil densities, soil cohesion, soil friction and the angle between line of pull and the blades - diggability & extractability. The variabilities are infinite.
Ya can't use a small experiment to convince people you have the answer. Hence my advice; listen to the most experienced cruisers.
DumnMad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 16:21   #169
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: on board, Australia
Boat: 11meter Power catamaran
Posts: 3,648
Images: 3
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

Jim,

I wouldn't be too hung up on the USL codes as the ultimate guides. Just look at the EC reqts as another minimum standard. Not sure what they say about anchors but their requirements for throughulls/seacocks is the subject of considerable debate.

I guess their primary purpose is as a minimum for commercial vessels and if there were big deficiencies they would show up quickly.

Certainly many cruising vessels have greater windage than standard and as long as you are happy with your system from your great experience all is well.

cheers
downunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 16:48   #170
Registered User
 
Kettlewell's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Boat: Finnsailer 38
Posts: 5,823
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

JonJo has done some interesting anchoring tests, and I will be very interested in what he comes up with on this new one.

JonJo: Can you post some links to some of your earlier tests?
__________________
JJKettlewell
"Go small, Go simple, Go now"
Kettlewell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 17:03   #171
Registered User
 
Snowpetrel's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hobart
Boat: Alloy Peterson 40
Posts: 3,919
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cate View Post
How, then am I to put much credence in these standards ? Either they grossly underestimate the anchor loads or they actually believe that the holding power of a stockless anchor is far greater than three times its mass.
Found this RIS statement interesting, page 13 or so discusses the issues of the usl code, so it seems the regulators know the system is flawed but it also kind of works... They are now trying to move from the prescriptive usl code to the more performance and outcome based NSCV, which allow you to find and justify an alternative equivalent solutions.

This means that if you can show evidence that your proposed method meets the same basic safety requirements. Eg Anchors are needed in case of engine failure. Therefore a vessel with twin independent engines and rudders on short haul trips might justify having no anchor because the risk analysis shows that the chances of both engines failing together are negligible. So the need for an anchor is gone..

A mate of mine is involved with all this and finds himself much of the time, juggling all sorts of industry and state lobby's. Not easy to get consensus on any change.

Cheers

Ben
__________________
My Ramblings
Snowpetrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 17:25   #172
cruiser

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pittwater, Sydney
Boat: Lightwave, Catamaran, 11.5m (38')
Posts: 1,000
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DumnMad View Post
Geotechnic or soil science, comparing different soil densities, soil cohesion, soil friction and the angle between line of pull and the blades - diggability & extractability. The variabilities are infinite.
Ya can't use a small experiment to convince people you have the answer. Hence my advice; listen to the most experienced cruisers.
Sorry, I thought you were referring to some science quote earlier, that I had missed
JonJo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 17:27   #173
cruiser

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pittwater, Sydney
Boat: Lightwave, Catamaran, 11.5m (38')
Posts: 1,000
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kettlewell View Post
JonJo has done some interesting anchoring tests, and I will be very interested in what he comes up with on this new one.

JonJo: Can you post some links to some of your earlier tests?
Do you subscribe to Practical Sailor?
JonJo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 17:32   #174
Registered User
 
Kettlewell's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Boat: Finnsailer 38
Posts: 5,823
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

I've seen that article in Practical Sailor, but I thought some others here would be interested too. I believe there is an Australian version on the Web somewhere too.
__________________
JJKettlewell
"Go small, Go simple, Go now"
Kettlewell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 17:44   #175
Registered User
 
Snowpetrel's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hobart
Boat: Alloy Peterson 40
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kettlewell View Post
JonJo has done some interesting anchoring tests, and I will be very interested in what he comes up with on this new one.
I am also interested to see how jonjo's theory stacks up, he might have a good point, In some bottom types it might be that a well set smaller anchor could be more reliable than a poorly set bigger one. I can see the chain getting wrapped under a poorly set large anchor and then pulling it out in a windshift, where a deeply set smaller one might not suffer?

As a group we should be interested in finding the lower limits of these new anchors capability. Even if we choose to upsize for our main, we might want to use a much smaller anchor as a spare, second anchor, kedge, or for when that massive power windlass dies and we have to complete a cruise hauling the lot up by hand!

I still feel that one size up (or rounding up) is a pretty good basic rule, two sizes up worries me slightly due to the massive loads the anchoring gear could be regularly subjected to when raising it from a sticky bottom, unless it is all also massively oversize.

The bigger your boat the more you need one large anchor, hence Morgans cloud and the dashews logic is correct, messing about with dinghy's and extra anchors is not a safe option, but under the 40 foot mark second anchors, and changing anchors to suit the bottom type is far more practical, hence Jonjo's setup.

I am also trying to get some idea of the relative effects of displacement on anchor loads, vs windage. Maybe some of jonjo's and jims success with their correctly sized (rather than oversized) anchors is due to the lighter weights of their boats. I recall the 60 footer I ran in Antarctica having pretty light anchor loads due to only being about 16 tonnes. Jump up to your average 50 foot cruiser at around 20 tonnes, I am guessing you need twice the anchor size to hold it than you would on a 10 tonne 40 footer. It might be that the more windage based anchor selection tables don't take this properly into account. Double the length of a boat, 4 times the windage, 8 times the displacement, while at the same timedoubling the weight of the anchor doesn't double the surface area of the anchor.

Finally all anchoring is a lottery, there is far to many variables. It wouldn't do to get to complacent, in the wrong bottom type any anchor, even a massively oversize one can fail (though probably not as often).

cheers

Ben
__________________
My Ramblings
Snowpetrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 18:09   #176
Registered User
 
Cotemar's Avatar

Community Sponsor

Join Date: Dec 2007
Boat: Mahe 36, Helia 44 Evo, MY 37
Posts: 5,731
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

None of the anchor sizing charts from any of the anchor manufacturer are specific to catamarans.
They may have a foot note saying you should consider going larger, but that’s it.

That may be one of the reason that most cat owners go up a size or two.
No catamaran data out there. I went through three anchors before I felt comfortable

Cats have more windage and are getting bigger and heavier every year.
Smaller anchors would not be a good move for some of these boats
Cotemar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 18:24   #177
cruiser

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pittwater, Sydney
Boat: Lightwave, Catamaran, 11.5m (38')
Posts: 1,000
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kettlewell View Post
I've seen that article in Practical Sailor, but I thought some others here would be interested too. I believe there is an Australian version on the Web somewhere too.
Nothing I have had published in Oz is on the Web, that I am aware of. Cruising Helmsman (Oz) has published articles which tend to be more digestable or populist versions of information contained in PS. CH were talking of going electronic this year, but I have not had an update recently. Sadly I do not get pdfs, publishers here are trying to protect their income from their paper publications simultaneously trying to cope with the electronic age.

Really the best source for anyone with an enquiring or questioning mind would be PS, who have a large enough readership (based on N Ams bigger population) and can manage to publish without pandering to advertisers. There might be better sources in general or for specifics - but I am not aware.
JonJo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 18:32   #178
Registered User
 
Kettlewell's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Boat: Finnsailer 38
Posts: 5,823
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

JonJo, isn't this your test?
__________________
JJKettlewell
"Go small, Go simple, Go now"
Kettlewell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 18:36   #179
Registered User
 
Snowpetrel's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hobart
Boat: Alloy Peterson 40
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotemar View Post
No catamaran data out there. I went through three anchors before I felt comfortable
What three anchors did you try?

Also considering windage, the more and more common practice of keeping solents jibs on furlers behind a light genoa has got to be worth going up an extra anchor size, whereas cockpit awnings, dodgers, arches etc might actually act as a riding sail reducing peak anchor loads?
__________________
My Ramblings
Snowpetrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 18:41   #180
cruiser

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pittwater, Sydney
Boat: Lightwave, Catamaran, 11.5m (38')
Posts: 1,000
Re: Anchors, Bigger is better?

Snowpetral,

Ben

You raise a number of interesting issues, and I think Jim is onto something similar.

In addition to length (and on the basis beam is roughly proportional to length for most monohulls) we have underwater profile, fin keel, long keel (the high rise development on the transom) etc and we also have displacement. Loads on anchors tend to be caused by snatching (rather than the yacht steadily sitting and imposing a load caused only by windage). If loads are caused by yachts yawing and sailing 'momentum' comes into the equation, which introduces displacement. But heavy yachts for a given size tend to be less skittish so though they weigh more they accelerate less - and maybe the momentum is the same (for light and heavy yachts of the same length)?

Catamarans are a different issue. We compared our profile, we are basically a 35', with a 3' transom extension, and our windage is the same as a Bavaria 45 from about 2 years ago. Windage being based on front and side areas. But we weigh in at 6t and the Bav maybe 12t (both in cruising mode). We have mini keels, draw 1m, and the Bav a full depth fin, draw 2m. I'm not sure that our skittishness is much different - but that is very subjective.
JonJo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
anchor, Boss, Bugel, fortress, kobra, Manson Supreme, Mantus, rocna

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Knox anchor anyone? Kettlewell Anchoring & Mooring 53 16-03-2013 15:36

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 13:02.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.