Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > General Sailing Forum
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 23-03-2019, 09:25   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Athens, GA
Boat: Rhodes 22
Posts: 12
Another confused solar poster

Hi all. I have just spent hours perusing the posts on solar and charger compatibility on this forum and am possibly more confused than when I started.

I have a pocket cruiser that I'm getting ready to put solar on. Since I trailer the boat frequently I've opted to go with a 100 w. Sunpower flexible panel. I can temporarily attach it to the bimini then store it under the cushions on the V-berth when the boat's on the trailer.

I really wanted to use a Victron Solar Smart mppt controller for it, but if I'm reading the specs right, the single 100 watt panel won't meet the minimum power requirement for even the 75/10. My preference would be to run the 75/15 as I plan to add a chart plotter and tiller pilot and want the benefit of the increased amp output. Am I reading the specs right? Nominal PV power for the 75/10 is 145w, 220w for the 75/15.

I'm not worried about the battery bank for day trips, as I can recharge on SP. but am planning some week long excursions where SP won't exist, hence the solar panel.

I would appreciate any and all advice/education on
A: the correct MPPT charge controller for this panel
B: a better understanding if I'm not reading the specs correctly

Thanks in advance for any help.
trailguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 09:33   #2
Registered User
 
sailorF54's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Perros-Guirec, France
Boat: Jeanneau Sunshine 36
Posts: 999
Re: Another confused solar poster

I've never read anything about a minimum power requirement for a solar charge controller.
Reference ?
A Victron 75/10 can accomodate UP TO about 150 W of 12V solar panel(s), a MAXIMUM limit...
sailorF54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 09:37   #3
Moderator
 
noelex 77's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jul 2007
Boat: Bestevaer.
Posts: 14,678
Re: Another confused solar poster

If you can provide a link to the panel you are planning to purchase it would be help, but a larger controller is fine with a smaller panel/array.
noelex 77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 09:40   #4
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Athens, GA
Boat: Rhodes 22
Posts: 12
Re: Another confused solar poster

Welcome to my confusion.
Here's a link to the spec sheet for the Victron series.
https://www.solar-electric.com/lib/w...-15_100-20.pdf

Line 3 states "Nominal pv power 12v 145w under the 75/10 heading and 220w under the 75/15 heading.
trailguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 09:41   #5
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Athens, GA
Boat: Rhodes 22
Posts: 12
Re: Another confused solar poster

Here's a link to the panel....

https://us.sunpower.com/sites/defaul...spec-sheet.pdf
trailguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 10:13   #6
Registered User
 
Dsanduril's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Petersburg, AK
Boat: Outremer 50S
Posts: 4,229
Re: Another confused solar poster

The key metric is the Max PV current of 13A, as long as your panels put out less than 13A you will be fine, the nominal is just a suggested value to get the most out of the controller without overloading it. The Sunpower panel has a 6.3A Isc, so in theory you could even connect 2 of them in parallel to the 75/10 and not exceed 13A, but you would end up limited on the output side (see the note at the bottom of the data sheet about excess PV). With the 75/15 you would have room for a second panel if you decided to go there.

Either the 75/10 or the 75/15 will be fine, they don't need to be maxed out to work. The Sunpower panels are fine, but for others reading this, do pay attention to the note at the bottom that the Victron controller requires 5V above battery voltage to start charging. That basically means you need a panel that can output ~18V to reliably start the controller. The key value is the Voc, if the controller is not charging the panel will rise to Voc with very little sun and start the controller. The Sunpower panels are 21V so no problem, but some other small (100W range) panels may be very close to that 18V limit.
Dsanduril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 10:13   #7
Moderator
 
noelex 77's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jul 2007
Boat: Bestevaer.
Posts: 14,678
Re: Another confused solar poster

Either the Victron 75/10 or 75/15, or even one of the larger Victron controllers will be fine.

The smaller 75/10 will deliver as much power as larger controllers with a single 100w panel. The limitation is the 100w solar panel output, not the the controllers maximum current. The larger controllers will only deliver more power if you plan to add more solar panels in the future.

The only caveat is the Victron controllers require (in theory) a high start up voltage. This does not seem to be a practical problem so I think it is probably best ignored, but if you are in a hot climate and installing a flexible panel with little ventilation there is a theoretical risk the Victron controllers (of any size) may be slightly late in starting in the morning. They would still work even in this scenario, but may deliver slightly less than optimum power.
noelex 77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 10:18   #8
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Athens, GA
Boat: Rhodes 22
Posts: 12
Re: Another confused solar poster

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dsanduril View Post
The key metric is the Max PV current of 13A, as long as your panels put out less than 13A you will be fine, the nominal is just a suggested value to get the most out of the controller without overloading it. The Sunpower panel has a 6.3A Isc, so in theory you could even connect 2 of them in parallel to the 75/10 and not exceed 13A, but you would end up limited on the output side (see the note at the bottom of the data sheet about excess PV). With the 75/15 you would have room for a second panel if you decided to go there.

Either the 75/10 or the 75/15 will be fine, they don't need to be maxed out to work. The Sunpower panels are fine, but for others reading this, do pay attention to the note at the bottom that the Victron controller requires 5V above battery voltage to start charging. That basically means you need a panel that can output ~18V to reliably start the controller. The key value is the Voc, if the controller is not charging the panel will rise to Voc with very little sun and start the controller. The Sunpower panels are 21V so no problem, but some other small (100W range) panels may be very close to that 18V limit.
That's what I needed to hear. Thank you! I think I was looking at the word "nominal" as meaning "minimum".
trailguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 10:29   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Athens, GA
Boat: Rhodes 22
Posts: 12
Re: Another confused solar poster

Quote:
Originally Posted by noelex 77 View Post
Either the Victron 75/10 or 75/15, or even one of the larger Victron controllers will be fine.

The smaller 75/10 will deliver as much power as larger controllers with a single 100w panel. The limitation is the 100w solar panel output, not the the controllers maximum current. The larger controllers will only deliver more power if you plan to add more solar panels in the future.

The only caveat is the Victron controllers require (in theory) a high start up voltage. This does not seem to be a practical problem so I think it is probably best ignored, but if you are in a hot climate and installing a flexible panel with little ventilation there is a theoretical risk the Victron controllers (of any size) may be slightly late in starting in the morning. They would still work even in this scenario, but may deliver slightly less than optimum power.
Thank you for explaining that for me.

I know heat is also going to be a problem (going to FL and sailing to Dry Tortugas). I've read several posts on fires starting on bimini's with flexible panels. So I'll be monitoring it closely.
trailguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 12:49   #10
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2017
Boat: Retired from CF
Posts: 13,317
Re: Another confused solar poster

Quote:
Originally Posted by trailguy View Post
Line 3 states "Nominal pv power 12v 145w under the 75/10 heading and 220w under the 75/15 heading.
Translation:

Lower power than this is fine.

You can also go quite a bit **higher** rated watts/amps than this

called overpanelling, but let's not get into that here.

Most critical is Voltage.

Going with a nominal "24V" panel, rated ~40Voc would give you a bit more output efficiency from the MPPT.

But you **must** not go over the 75V spec, 65-70 to be safe.

And the **minimum** actual voltage for startup is I think 5V above your charge output to the bank.

TL;DR you're fine
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 13:05   #11
Registered User
 
GILow's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the boat, somewhere in Australia.
Boat: Swanson 42 & Kelly Peterson 44
Posts: 9,155
Re: Another confused solar poster

Quote:
Originally Posted by trailguy View Post

...My preference would be to run the 75/15 as I plan to add a chart plotter and tiller pilot and want the benefit of the increased amp output....


I'm not worried about the battery bank for day trips, as I can recharge on SP. but am planning some week long excursions where SP won't exist, hence the solar panel..


That first bit I’ve quoted does not make sense. Your power output is going to be limited by the panel, not the regulator. Also, be aware that, depending on the nature of the boat being steered, tillerpilots can chew up a lot of power. One battery may not have enough capacity for a full day of sailing, particularly if solar input is down due to cloud cover.

As for the second bit I quoted... what are you saying there? Makes no sense as written. “The SP won’t exist, hence the Solar Panel”. A week long excursion without the solar to recharge the battery will be a problem unless you have some other means of charging. Or a seriously huge battery bank.
__________________
Refitting… again.
GILow is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 13:13   #12
Registered User
 
rgleason's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Boat: 1981 Bristol 32 Sloop
Posts: 17,634
Images: 2
Re: Another confused solar poster

For smaller and lower power PV panels that don't have as many cells and thus have lower voltages there is the option of using Gensun mppt or Gensun Booster mppt which may be more effective for individual panels, but they don't have the Bluetooth App of Victron's.
rgleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 13:22   #13
Moderator
 
Jim Cate's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: cruising SW Pacific
Boat: Jon Sayer 1-off 46 ft fract rig sloop strip plank in W Red Cedar
Posts: 21,203
Re: Another confused solar poster

Quote:
Originally Posted by GILow View Post
That first bit I’ve quoted does not make sense. Your power output is going to be limited by the panel, not the regulator. Also, be aware that, depending on the nature of the boat being steered, tillerpilots can chew up a lot of power. One battery may not have enough capacity for a full day of sailing, particularly if solar input is down due to cloud cover.

As for the second bit I quoted... what are you saying there? Makes no sense as written. “The SP won’t exist, hence the Solar Panel”. A week long excursion without the solar to recharge the battery will be a problem unless you have some other means of charging. Or a seriously huge battery bank.
Matt, I think that in this case "SP" means shore power, not solar power. (Just guessing due to context).

Jim
__________________
Jim and Ann s/v Insatiable II, lying Port Cygnet Tasmania once again.
Jim Cate is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 14:35   #14
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2017
Boat: Retired from CF
Posts: 13,317
Re: Another confused solar poster

Yes as accurate as possible an Ah per day energy usage budget is the foundation, everything in the overall system design is derived from that.

Unless you just get lots of ICE sources and a big LFP bank to create electricity off grid.

Being dependent on just a bit of solar requires precision and being very conservative.
john61ct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2019, 14:53   #15
Registered User
 
GILow's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the boat, somewhere in Australia.
Boat: Swanson 42 & Kelly Peterson 44
Posts: 9,155
Re: Another confused solar poster

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cate View Post
Matt, I think that in this case "SP" means shore power, not solar power. (Just guessing due to context).

Jim
Thanks Jim, I think you have it. Shore Power is an alien concept to me.
__________________
Refitting… again.
GILow is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
solar


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New poster from Middle River, MD truant Meets & Greets 3 16-09-2008 18:44
Newbie poster from New York jrmirq Meets & Greets 5 11-09-2008 19:23
First time poster, long time sailer. Richkd Meets & Greets 16 31-08-2008 06:18
Old lurker, new poster John Galt Meets & Greets 6 10-03-2008 14:34

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 15:42.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.