Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 25-10-2016, 21:42   #31
Registered User
 
UNCIVILIZED's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Up the mast, looking for clean wind.
Boat: Currently Shopping, & Heavily in LUST!
Posts: 5,629
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Training Wheels View Post
Um... 38!
I think that you might need a 12-Step program for this.
__________________

The Uncommon Thing, The Hard Thing, The Important Thing (in Life): Making Promises to Yourself, And Keeping Them.
UNCIVILIZED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2016, 21:45   #32
Registered User
 
Training Wheels's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Left coast.
Posts: 1,451
Re: Low friction ring vs block

I've got a few more to add, then I quit. I promise!
Training Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2016, 23:02   #33
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Boat: Island Packet 40
Posts: 6,462
Images: 7
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNCIVILIZED View Post
If you truly want a becket, you're probably best to build larger, longer side plates for the existing blocks, & keep the bolt in the sheave's axle. That, instead of trying to use a shackle through it's axle. Or, add a 2nd set of side plates to the block which start at the sheave's axle, & extend out past the sheave. Where you'd then have a seperate bolt for the becket's head.


I have been running into this problem for a few years now.

The deck equipment I have on the boat appears to have gone out of production and the new stuff appears to have a lot more plastic in it. (I had a genaker halyard jam because the plastic cheek plate failed and had to go up the mast twice in the open sea to get the sail down and have had a fierce aversion to blocks with plastic ever since)

Since I'm one of those folks who likes to keep a set a set without outliers and also a fairly stingy boat owner I find myself repairing the stuff I have fairly often now.

The Ronston stuff on the boat has riveted shafts so I drill the ends off the shafts and replace them with stainless bolts which I machine the thickness of the heads and nuts down and punch the nuts to keep them from unscrewing. They work just as well and it is easy to replace the sheaves from then on.
RaymondR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 03:12   #34
Registered User
 
Markhunter1097's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Australia
Boat: Hinckley 49, Evening Star, originally owned by Lawrence Rockefeller
Posts: 282
Re: Low friction ring vs block

At the yacht club today I had the block on display and was asking the crowd. An answer came out from a shipwright who said that ceramic paint will restore the sheave, reverse the cheeks and the block will be good for another 30 years!
Will post the result in a week or so, but it seems like a good solution
Markhunter1097 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 05:44   #35
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: the Med
Boat: Nauta 54' by Scott Kaufman/S&S - 1989
Posts: 1,180
Images: 3
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockhead View Post
I agree actually.

Harken are great. The Lewmar ball bearing blocks are also very good, as are the Wichard ones.

I have these:

Lewmar 130mm High Load Single Footblock | MAURI PRO SAILING

Bulletproof and excellent. Rated for 6 tons (!) safe working load. 15 years of hard use and still flawless. Cost less than $500 each and worth every penny.

The Harken ones are probably even better.

Good deck hardware is key! Don't compromise! Spend your money on sails and deck hardware and ropes first; then think about what to do with what is left over, if any
*

The roller bearings add much to the cost, say that they double it up, or more (3X).

So, it must be a judicious choice, to go with bearings, unless a racing boat.

I think only the travellers (cars) justify it: heavy load + lengthy movements
TheThunderbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 07:44   #36
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mountains south of Campo. South East of TKT in Baja.
Boat: 45 ft., Leopard
Posts: 195
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markhunter1097 View Post
At the yacht club today I had the block on display and was asking the crowd. An answer came out from a shipwright who said that ceramic paint will restore the sheave, reverse the cheeks and the block will be good for another 30 years!
Will post the result in a week or so, but it seems like a good solution
JB weld ? It is strong and can be machined.
fuentes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 08:11   #37
Moderator
 
Dockhead's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denmark (Winter), Helsinki (Summer); Cruising the Baltic Sea this year!
Boat: Cutter-Rigged Moody 54
Posts: 33,873
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheThunderbird View Post
*

The roller bearings add much to the cost, say that they double it up, or more (3X).

So, it must be a judicious choice, to go with bearings, unless a racing boat.

I think only the travellers (cars) justify it: heavy load + lengthy movements
I think jib sheet turning blocks really need ball bearings -- very rapid movement of the sheet through the block during tacking.

My boat was originally built with these -- I did not add them. They were specified by Bill Dixon for the original build.
Dockhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 18:38   #38
Registered User
 
UNCIVILIZED's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Up the mast, looking for clean wind.
Boat: Currently Shopping, & Heavily in LUST!
Posts: 5,629
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Often enough you can pick up older blocks, even circa 1970's, cheap. Though they'll likely have roller bearings instead. Which in high load applications are sometimes preferable. I've scored plenty of these over the years, & with a spot of TLC they generally are as good as new. And even if you have a few flat spotted bearings, replacement (bearings) generally cost less than a pint does.

BTW, stainless is far from the only material that you can use for side plates. Or anywhere else on blocks.
And if you're going to refurbish these, it truly is worth getting new sheaves. They'll spin more freely, & won't come apart at some inopportune time, severing your expensive sheets like older sheaves are prone to.
__________________

The Uncommon Thing, The Hard Thing, The Important Thing (in Life): Making Promises to Yourself, And Keeping Them.
UNCIVILIZED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 20:34   #39
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: May 2012
Location: New Orleans
Boat: We have a problem... A serious addiction issue.
Posts: 3,974
Re: Low friction ring vs block

The nly time I don't reach for Harken is when I use Karver. The Karver KB blocks are a nice transition between low friction rings and standard blocks. But they are not cheap either.
__________________
Greg

- If animals weren't meant to be eaten then they wouldn't be made of food.
Stumble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 20:52   #40
Registered User
 
Stu Jackson's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cowichan Bay, BC (Maple Bay Marina)
Posts: 9,706
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Have you considered Garhauer? Great prices, they'll make anything for you.
__________________
Stu Jackson
Catalina 34 #224 (1986) C34IA Secretary
Cowichan Bay, BC, SR/FK, M25, Rocna 10 (22#) (NZ model)
Stu Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 00:33   #41
Registered User
 
Markhunter1097's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Australia
Boat: Hinckley 49, Evening Star, originally owned by Lawrence Rockefeller
Posts: 282
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu Jackson View Post
Have you considered Garhauer? Great prices, they'll make anything for you.

Yes Stu, they seem good value, yet they aren't in Australia!
Markhunter1097 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 00:35   #42
Registered User
 
Markhunter1097's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Australia
Boat: Hinckley 49, Evening Star, originally owned by Lawrence Rockefeller
Posts: 282
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNCIVILIZED View Post
Often enough you can pick up older blocks, even circa 1970's, cheap. Though they'll likely have roller bearings instead. Which in high load applications are sometimes preferable. I've scored plenty of these over the years, & with a spot of TLC they generally are as good as new. And even if you have a few flat spotted bearings, replacement (bearings) generally cost less than a pint does.

BTW, stainless is far from the only material that you can use for side plates. Or anywhere else on blocks.
And if you're going to refurbish these, it truly is worth getting new sheaves. They'll spin more freely, & won't come apart at some inopportune time, severing your expensive sheets like older sheaves are prone to.

Agree with you on this, the boat I race on has plastic cheeked blocks, seen and heard two blow up to date
Stainless it will be
Markhunter1097 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 00:36   #43
Registered User
 
StuM's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Port Moresby,Papua New Guinea
Boat: FP Belize Maestro 43 and OPBs
Posts: 12,891
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markhunter1097 View Post
Yes Stu, they seem good value, yet they aren't in Australia!
Just sayin'

https://www.garhauer.com.au/
StuM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 00:45   #44
Registered User
 
Markhunter1097's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Australia
Boat: Hinckley 49, Evening Star, originally owned by Lawrence Rockefeller
Posts: 282
Re: Low friction ring vs block

The tread has gone away from the ring question, which I think has been answered in the negative, to now what to do.
I hear all the comments on ball bearing blocks, yet the expensive of these seems disproportionate to the advantages, remember this is a cruising yacht, after a tack the sheet is rarely touched, and then I just hit the button on some great Antal electric primaries.
I have ordered some industrial sheaves, and I have gone the refurb route on the old ones. Will see what happens.
Most importantly I don't want to compromise safety in the case of a failure, sometimes I use a safety strop around the block, sheet and mount, just in case, and will be doing this on whatever I go with until I'm satisfied the loads can be handled. The load by the way is probably 1.5 ton, and up to 5 on a shock load. Am running 14 mm sheets, which is down from 16 mm the boat came with. Lots of options and fun deciding what to do.
Will keep the forum up to date
Markhunter1097 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 00:50   #45
Registered User
 
Markhunter1097's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Australia
Boat: Hinckley 49, Evening Star, originally owned by Lawrence Rockefeller
Posts: 282
Re: Low friction ring vs block

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuentes View Post
JB weld ? It is strong and can be machined.

No, I think he is going to use ceracoat, will see what happens here. The last time I used this product was on the exhaust manifold on an Etype. I didn't realise it also has good abrasion qualities.
Markhunter1097 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
whipping - antal method - low friction ring estarzinger Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 76 21-04-2020 07:50
Low friction ring fiddle blocks (for runners) Matt Johnson Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 0 31-10-2015 18:45
Double Purchase Through Single Low-Friction Ring Dockhead Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 19 20-04-2015 11:14

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:34.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.