Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > General Sailing Forum
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Closed Thread
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-02-2020, 13:48   #106
Senior Cruiser
 
newhaul's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: puget sound washington
Boat: 1968 Islander bahama 24 hull 182, 1963 columbia 29 defender. hull # 60
Posts: 12,174
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sailorboy1 View Post
I bet those pooping directly over the side or tossing the bucketful over are going to have a rough time using their "it doesn't say it is illegal" argument in court. Next time the water cop is next to you give it a try.
the bucket and chuck it method is in violation of the law . You put it into a container . So now that bucket is a holding tank.
__________________
Non illigitamus carborundum
newhaul is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 14:10   #107
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Boat: SAnta Cruz 27
Posts: 6,756
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by redneckrob View Post
It's really a moot point. Wildlife is going to defecate wherever they are when they get the urge. That in no way in any reasonable universe justifies humans dumping their feces in the water in a mooring area any more than it justifies you dumping the discharge from your home toilet into the street in front of your house because birds happen to defecate there as well. The entire "well wildlife does it so why can't I" argument is absolutely asinine, and relative bacteria count of different species feces doesn't make it any less so.
You obviously didn't get my point. I was objecting to the unsubstantiated claims by several posters that animal poop is not as nasty as human poop. I would suggest that science says otherwise.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647569/

This article has little zingers in it like

"Approximately one-third of deaths among children under five years due to diarrhea in the Global Burden of Disease 2015 report are attributed to pathogens that can be found in animal feces."
donradcliffe is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 14:12   #108
Registered User
 
Cadence's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SC
Boat: None,build the one shown of glass, had many from 6' to 48'.
Posts: 10,208
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by newhaul View Post
the bucket and chuck it method is in violation of the law . You put it into a container . So now that bucket is a holding tank.
Guess we will have to get rid of the old oaken bucket. Anyone determined tp break the law can. It probably comes down ro ethics.
Cadence is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 14:16   #109
Senior Cruiser
 
newhaul's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: puget sound washington
Boat: 1968 Islander bahama 24 hull 182, 1963 columbia 29 defender. hull # 60
Posts: 12,174
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadence View Post
Guess we will have to get rid of the old oaken bucket. Anyone determined tp break the law can. It probably comes down ro ethics.
get some sawdust and make it a boone john

Not best on a boat but makes it legal

There is a real difference between right , or correct
And legal by the law
__________________
Non illigitamus carborundum
newhaul is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 15:38   #110
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: perth west australia
Posts: 28
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

what wealthy boater?
rogue trader is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 15:56   #111
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: perth west australia
Posts: 28
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by donradcliffe View Post
You obviously didn't get my point. I was objecting to the unsubstantiated claims by several posters that animal poop is not as nasty as human poop. I would suggest that science says otherwise.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647569/

This article has little zingers in it like

"Approximately one-third of deaths among children under five years due to diarrhea in the Global Burden of Disease 2015 report are attributed to pathogens that can be found in animal feces."
perhaps a seat conected to a 12inch plastic rigged over the stern of the boat like in the days of drake ect (towel for modesty of course).
rogue trader is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 16:14   #112
Senior Cruiser
 
newhaul's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: puget sound washington
Boat: 1968 Islander bahama 24 hull 182, 1963 columbia 29 defender. hull # 60
Posts: 12,174
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue trader View Post
perhaps a seat conected to a 12inch plastic rigged over the stern of the boat like in the days of drake ect (towel for modesty of course).
they didn't call it the poop deck for nothing
__________________
Non illigitamus carborundum
newhaul is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 16:15   #113
Senior Cruiser
 
newhaul's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: puget sound washington
Boat: 1968 Islander bahama 24 hull 182, 1963 columbia 29 defender. hull # 60
Posts: 12,174
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue trader View Post
what wealthy boater?
that's y question .

Heck I have to work just to pay the moorage.
__________________
Non illigitamus carborundum
newhaul is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 16:54   #114
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 121
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Aside from being nasty to dump in rivers and close to shore where people will be, possibly leading to serious health problems...


There are serious ecological reasons not to dump in rivers and near shore. If enough people do it can lead to dead zones, where all the nutrients in poop, urine, and other organic waste, such as kitchen scraps, cause extraordinary growth of certain organisms leading to low levels of oxygen as well as a multitude of other ecologically destabilizing effects.


https://www.nationalgeographic.org/e...dia/dead-zone/


Please, just don't, unless absolutely necessary.


An option would be to set up a composting toilet system, then whenever you have the opportunity you can dispose of the waste properly, either by dumping well offshore where it can dissipate harmlessly, or you can dig a hole well off the waterway and bury it.



Also good to do at home, so all that doesn't end up in rivers and the oceans via the waste treatment system. Not to mention it is a waste of perfectly good fertilizer for your garden or trees, after a proper composting cycle of course. My brothers garden is very healthy and productive using properly composted waste.
dustman is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 17:23   #115
Registered User
 
Scorpius's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Madeira Park, BC
Boat: Custom steel, 41' LOD
Posts: 1,375
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

I'm sure the ICW has lots of pump out stations. Use them. If you are in a remote area with no convenient pump out then discharge overboard - but not in a tight Cove or popular Anchorage. Do it in open water as far from shore as possible. Ever think why popular anchorages have slimy bottoms and rarely used ones nice clean sand? Think about it.

If you have an older Canadian boat you may not have a holding tank. Do something about it. That was the situation when I bought Scorpius and I replaced the old direct-discharge head with a composer. Never regretted it.

The irony around here is that the US has declared all of Puget Sound and their half of Juan de Fuca Strait a no-discharge zone while a few miles away Greater Victoria, with half a million people or so discharges all their raw sewage directly into the salt chuck. Along with all the crap our logging industry puts into the water it's a national disgrace.
Scorpius is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 17:32   #116
Moderator Emeritus
 
a64pilot's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Jacksonville/ out cruising
Boat: Island Packet 38
Posts: 31,351
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustman View Post
Aside from being nasty to dump in rivers and close to shore where people will be, possibly leading to serious health problems...


There are serious ecological reasons not to dump in rivers and near shore. If enough people do it can lead to dead zones, where all the nutrients in poop, urine, and other organic waste, such as kitchen scraps, cause extraordinary growth of certain organisms leading to low levels of oxygen as well as a multitude of other ecologically destabilizing effects.


https://www.nationalgeographic.org/e...dia/dead-zone/




Please, just don't, unless absolutely necessary.


An option would be to set up a composting toilet system, then whenever you have the opportunity you can dispose of the waste properly, either by dumping well offshore where it can dissipate harmlessly, or you can dig a hole well off the waterway and bury it.



Also good to do at home, so all that doesn't end up in rivers and the oceans via the waste treatment system. Not to mention it is a waste of perfectly good fertilizer for your garden or trees, after a proper composting cycle of course. My brothers garden is very healthy and productive using properly composted waste.
In Korea apparently they dispose of the waste in rice paddies as fertilizer. Whenever it rained in Camp Humphries we weren’t allowed to use the football field as it was contaminated with fecal bacteria and had made Soldiers sick in the past.

A “composting” toilet like what it used in a boat does NOT eliminate the pathogens, it’s not really a composting toilet, merely dessicates it or dries it out, except for being dry there isn’t much if any difference between it and what’s in a holding tank, you should dispose of it in a safe manner just like the contents of a holding tank.
a64pilot is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 17:42   #117
Registered User
 
tomfl's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Florida
Boat: Seawind 1000xl
Posts: 2,592
Images: 15
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by a64pilot View Post
SNIP

A “composting” toilet like what it used in a boat does NOT eliminate the pathogens, it’s not really a composting toilet, merely dessicates it or dries it out, except for being dry there isn’t much if any difference between it and what’s in a holding tank, you should dispose of it in a safe manner just like the contents of a holding tank.
There is a huge difference between a moist and dry environment. Pathogens that can live and thrive in a moist environment die quickly in a dry environment. Not just the pathogens die, other microbes die as well. Not sure if you have ever smelled what comes out of a holding tank as opposed to what comes out of a composting head but if you think "there isn’t much if any difference" you may need to see a medical doctor about your sense of smell.

As an aside while it is true that in Florida the FWC does not pay attention to land based sewage plants who discharge into the water ways the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida Department of Health both have jurisdiction and frequently fine plants that illegally discharge; usually those fines are based on how large the discharge is and how long it lasts.
tomfl is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 17:53   #118
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Boat: Island Packet 40
Posts: 6,462
Images: 7
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by taxwizz View Post
And as their bodies jam up with poop, and intestines become overloaded, they likely eat less, too.

But be ready for the 2 ton dump at the end. YIKES.
"Holy shirt, Batman"
Put the crew on a hard cheese and instant coffee diet and you'll get the same result without medicating them.
RaymondR is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 17:57   #119
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 121
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomfl View Post
There is a huge difference between a moist and dry environment. Pathogens that can live and thrive in a moist environment die quickly in a dry environment. Not just the pathogens die, other microbes die as well. Not sure if you have ever smelled what comes out of a holding tank as opposed to what comes out of a composting head but if you think "there isn’t much if any difference" you may need to see a medical doctor about your sense of smell.

As an aside while it is true that in Florida the FWC does not pay attention to land based sewage plants who discharge into the water ways the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida Department of Health both have jurisdiction and frequently fine plants that illegally discharge; usually those fines are based on how large the discharge is and how long it lasts.

To bad the fines are usually less for businesses than the profit made by those kinds of practices.
dustman is offline  
Old 06-02-2020, 18:09   #120
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 121
Re: How seriously is the 2M dumping policy enforced? (Yet another poo question)

Quote:
Originally Posted by a64pilot View Post

A “composting” toilet like what it used in a boat does NOT eliminate the pathogens, it’s not really a composting toilet, merely dessicates it or dries it out, except for being dry there isn’t much if any difference between it and what’s in a holding tank, you should dispose of it in a safe manner just like the contents of a holding tank.

Controlling the moisture level and carbon/nitrogen balance DOES eliminate most pathogens. It is all about creating an environment in which the pathogenic organisms are out-competed and/or cannot survive. At the very least, storing your waste in this way prevents the growth of more pathogenic organisms(a holding tank is a near perfect breeding ground) until you can dispose of it in a sound way. There are next to no living pathogenic organisms left in properly composted waste. This is fact, not fiction. Suggested reading: The Humanure Handbook.
dustman is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
grass


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flushing poo with poo amiller Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 23 05-02-2020 12:58
Winlink-3rd Party Rules to be enforced AA3JY Marine Electronics 19 14-11-2019 12:57
How many Policy Holders on Marine Insurance Policy? Sailor647 Rules of the Road, Regulations & Red Tape 8 27-07-2018 13:47
Newly Enforced BVI Rules & Regulations SVAspen Atlantic & the Caribbean 24 08-10-2016 14:59
Old Florida anchoring law being enforced! keyspc Liveaboard's Forum 7 23-06-2011 19:32

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:24.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.