Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > Multihull Sailboats
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 23-08-2018, 15:11   #16
Registered User
 
Franziska's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Panschwitz, Germany
Boat: Woods Mira 35 Catamaran
Posts: 4,261
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

Get rid of two 100l freshwater tanks, replace by desalinator.
Replace household fridge by built in custom one.

Replace books by Kindle (Sigh!)

Change toilet to dry separating one.

Swap paper charts for the ones one actually needs.

Do all repairs to a good level and get rid of some old paint, wood and spares.

Reduce wardrobe when getting to warmer climates.
__________________
www.ladyrover.com
Franziska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 15:21   #17
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Queensland, Australia
Boat: None at present--between vessels. Ex Piver Loadstar 12.5 metres
Posts: 1,475
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

To reduce freshwater tankage one can make up solar condensers to get drinking water.

I use blue polypropylene water containers which drop in to carpeted racks as water tanks. One need fill only as many as you need for each leg of your voyage.

Instead of twin dieseld or twin outboards--run ONE diesel engine and generator, and drive outboard legs using electric or hydraulic motors. You usually only need them for berthing and manoeuvring in close confines. When sailing they are hoisted clear of the water. If one has to make a long passage under motor, or may need to some day, diesel hydraulic or electric are proven to be effective as long as hydraulic fluid is cooled and fan-cooled electric motors are ventilated.


I also use polypropylene diesel storage in the same carpeted racks, with a carpeted locking bar to prevent movement. Storage of outboard fuel is in carpeted deck lockers using smaller 10 litre containers. The lockers with lids closed and bolted also serve as seats. One should NEVER bring volatile fuels such as petrol below decks.

Fuel containers, and water too, can be removed, lowered over the side into a tender and rowed ashore for filling. Each holds ten or20 litres of fuel or water. No rust, cheap to replace, and one leak--if you ever get one--will only dump at most 20 litres of fuel or water into your bilges.

It is a personal thing of mine--but I HATE not having the means for filling tanks by dinghy or tender. In most coastal cruising to interesting places, there are no dockside facilities, and a stroll into town with a 20 litre container and a golf-club trolley or a little rickshaw trolley such as is often towed by a bicycle, or of one's own invention means fuel can be collected with any shopping, and the trolley collapses or dismantles for transport back to the vessel or for on-board stowage. Before I got crook knees--a yoke was fine for a short walk. Now I use a trolley.

While one can shed some weight aboard by using 20 mm nylon anchor rode fastened to 20 metres of short-link 13 mm chain and a 10-20 kg kellet, never be tempted to replace a galvanised steel anchor with an aluminium one. Not if you want to keep your vessel from going ashore or heading off out to sea by itself..

I can not understand why SOLAS allows these things to be sold.
Mike Banks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 15:26   #18
Registered User
 
Dave_S's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brisbane Australia
Boat: Schionning Waterline 1480
Posts: 1,987
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

In my case I can add buoyancy.

These are the outboard wells in each hull. Within each hull there is about 117lt of water at rest.

I am going to seal these openings with closed cell foam and just leave the minimum hole for the outboards, then a hatch to cover the hole when the outboards are up, with a venturi drain that should keep most of the water out while moving.

I should gain 220kg of buoyancy + less drag in the water.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20180519_103432.jpg
Views:	225
Size:	405.3 KB
ID:	175986  
__________________
Regards
Dave
Dave_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 16:27   #19
Writing Full-Time Since 2014
 
thinwater's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: PDQ Altair, 32/34
Posts: 9,617
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

[QUOTE=sailjumanji;2703366... We carry 150 ft of anchor chain spliced to another 60 ft of rode. I don't think this is an area to save weight.[/QUOTE]


Actually, you did. I did the same with a similar boat. That is enough for you to anchor on all-chain most of the time, and the rest of the time enough to provide catenary. Many mono sailors would think anything less than 300 feet is skimpy. You saved 150 feet of useless chain.


---



High grade chain vs. BBB? What about grade 70?
__________________
Gear Testing--Engineering--Sailing
https://sail-delmarva.blogspot.com/
thinwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 17:09   #20
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Port Aransas, Texas
Boat: 2019 Seawind 1160 Lite
Posts: 2,126
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinwater View Post
Actually, you did. I did the same with a similar boat. That is enough for you to anchor on all-chain most of the time, and the rest of the time enough to provide catenary. Many mono sailors would think anything less than 300 feet is skimpy. You saved 150 feet of useless chain.
When I purchased the boat, the PO had removed the windlass and was using a rope rode with about 15 ft of chain. Told me at 60 yrs old, he could haul rope easily and no one had any business adding the weight of chain to the boat. It took me about a month to install a windlass, and put the chain on the boat.

And I have never used any of the rope rode. Buy two friends had boats drag and ride up onto their anchor rode, and they ended up having to cut it to separate. With an all-chain rode, that is tough. So I added the rope, and spliced, and figured I'd add a little length in case I do eventually have to anchor in deeper water.
sailjumanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 18:28   #21
Registered User
 
Training Wheels's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Left coast.
Posts: 1,451
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

Funny, when we bought our boat, the first thing I did was remove the electric windlass and the electric winch to save weight. Oh, I’m 58. I figure the exercise is good for me. Just went sailing on a mono with all electric winches, and I just don’t get it.
Training Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 18:36   #22
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Port Aransas, Texas
Boat: 2019 Seawind 1160 Lite
Posts: 2,126
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

Quote:
Originally Posted by Training Wheels View Post
Funny, when we bought our boat, the first thing I did was remove the electric windlass and the electric winch to save weight. Oh, I’m 58. I figure the exercise is good for me. Just went sailing on a mono with all electric winches, and I just don’t get it.
Yep, I agree. I'm a year older than you. But I wanted chain and didn't want to pull-up by hand. Plus when you have to move in a blow that someone else is dragging down on you, an electric windlass with switch at the helm is sweet.
sailjumanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 20:28   #23
Registered User
 
Training Wheels's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Left coast.
Posts: 1,451
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

If someone else is dragging down on me, I’m tossing my rode and coming back for it later. Moving in a blow, my beautiful wife of 30+ years is motoring into it while I’m pulling up the rode. Did I mention that our chain is 1/4” G70?
Training Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 20:33   #24
Registered User
 
Nicholson58's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Caribbean live aboard
Boat: Camper & Nicholson58 Ketch - ROXY Traverse City, Michigan No.668283
Posts: 6,369
Images: 84
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

We have small microfiber towels, very light and they dry fast. They also are compact.

Composting heads: Air Head. Nature’s Head.

Don’t forget as long as you are economizing away the convenience and comfort of life to remove all beer, wine and liquor and ice.

We weigh 40tons, 400 gallons diesel, 280 gallons water, four anchors totaling 380#, 320 feet 7/16 chain, 17000# lead keel (monohull). We made Cheasapeake to Virgin Gorda in 7.5 days, 1500 Miles with 500+ Miles over a two day period in 16 to 25 foot seas. I would not have wanted to be doing this in a stripped down ultra light cat. (Or Mono) Just be careful what you compromise away. You may wish you had it back.

We were in Antigua for the 600 last season. Many hot light cats, tri’s and crazy monos took off from English Harbor in 30 knots or so of wind. There were a lot of broken vessels that never completed. One capsized. Many fins, wings, rudders, boards broken or missing.
Nicholson58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 21:03   #25
Registered User
 
Training Wheels's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Left coast.
Posts: 1,451
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

So, is that a Nicholson 58 multihull? All I can say is “no, not the rum!”.
Training Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 21:16   #26
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: On the boat
Boat: LAGOON 400
Posts: 2,349
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

enable watermaker to run while sailing. I only have up to 100 L of water for 2 days in tanks, instead of filling 600 L tanks.

On passage where performance really matters can save ~ 0.5T.
arsenelupiga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 21:18   #27
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 392
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

How about adding some to lose some, by adding transom extensions?

We all know some owners added them and some builders also, ex. Seawind 1000 - 1000XL.

It seems added capacity aft sure would be nice for affording an arch to hold lotsa solar in the best charging location and lose weight by removing batteries and full water tanks for a watermaker. Or do it to make up for the added payload aft for a bigger/faster dinghy and water toys.

Not to mention the handling improvements (pitching and a little more speed), ideal swimming, dinghy and boarding platform.

It's a mod I've had planned for a long while for whenever I became a cat owner. It just seems like a good add-on at a low cost via diy or by a yard vs the builder reaping the benefits with selling you a 2'-4' longer cat.

Any before and after data would be really appreciated from owners who have done so already.
sailorcherry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2018, 21:44   #28
Writing Full-Time Since 2014
 
thinwater's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: PDQ Altair, 32/34
Posts: 9,617
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

Quote:
Originally Posted by sailorcherry View Post
How about adding some to lose some, by adding transom extensions?

We all know some owners added them and some builders also, ex. Seawind 1000 - 1000XL....
Absolutely. I added 2' to the transom of my PDQ; really cleans up the wake. A large number of cats cold benefit from this simple surgery. Also a nice swim/loading platform and a smoother ride. All positives.

Expensive if you are not a dab hand with FRP. Not too bad if you are experienced.

---

Semi-flexible vs. rigid solar panels. I had rigid panels on the hard top for ~ 8 years before I sold the boat. Now I have a semi-flexible panel, but I don't know enough about the durability. 2-years, so far it's good. Both were Chinese. Now that I think about weight and windage, I like the semi-flexible better I think, but ONLY if you can support them well and stay off them.

Having enough panels also reduces the need for heavy batteries. A pair of semi-flexible Chinese panels can more or less replace a battery for similar cost but 1/4 the weight and perhaps longer life.

Batteries? How thin can you cut it, allowing for some deeper discharge (occasionally 70% discharge, instead of always limiting to 50%, recharging quickly to avoid sulfation) Is lithium worth the cost? I'm guessing that both of these depend on how you use the boat. Full-time cruise vs. day sail and short cruise are VERY different in terms of lifetime cycles; thousands vs hundreds in a normal life span.
__________________
Gear Testing--Engineering--Sailing
https://sail-delmarva.blogspot.com/
thinwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2018, 00:17   #29
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: ABC's
Boat: Prout Snowgoose 35
Posts: 1,756
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

Provided that the ship is within its designed weight specs. What is benefit of saving weight? I mentioned earlier in the thread that as far as I have seen, heavier boats are more stable anchor, and smoother, less violent movement (more dampened) than lighter ships.

I know that on my cat, that there is no noticeable difference in speed when I have full water tanks (300kg) compared to nearly empty (50kg).
mikedefieslife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2018, 00:27   #30
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 392
Re: Multihull Weight Saving Stratagies

You must have a heavy cat then, right? Something not very performance oriented I take it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikedefieslife View Post
Provided that the ship is within its designed weight specs. What is benefit of saving weight?

I know that on my cat, that there is no noticeable difference in speed when I have full water tanks (300kg) compared to nearly empty (50kg).
sailorcherry is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
hull, multihull


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Saving Weight thinwater Construction, Maintenance & Refit 55 18-02-2016 12:20
Volvo MD2 weight vs Md6a weight. gjordan Engines and Propulsion Systems 2 05-07-2012 23:23
Multihull weight sensitivity? jhovan Multihull Sailboats 16 11-06-2012 16:33
Saving weight fastcat435 Multihull Sailboats 185 19-08-2008 17:11

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 21:38.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.