Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > Monohull Sailboats
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 23-08-2016, 21:55   #16
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pangaea
Posts: 10,856
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeddyDiver View Post
Yes, as long as everything works perfectly thou it takes a bit more time with bigger boat do things. But just one mainsail car jammed at the wrong time can change situations much worse..
Simply not true. The problems are basically the same when they occur, but the larger the boat, the more forgiving.

Let me provide a good example:

If and when we suffer a complete engine failure in a situation wih no wind and a leward shore and dropping the anchor is not an option, our tender and outboard motor can be launched quickly and are large enough to lash to the side of the boat and become a tow boat or auxilary engine. We can also carry enough fuel for the outboard to do this for many miles. The smaller boat will most likely end up on the rocks.
Kenomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2016, 22:28   #17
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: May 2012
Location: New Orleans
Boat: We have a problem... A serious addiction issue.
Posts: 3,974
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeddyDiver View Post
Yes, as long as everything works perfectly thou it takes a bit more time with bigger boat do things. But just one mainsail car jammed at the wrong time can change situations much worse..
If you jam the headboard on any boat you have an issue. But it isn't substantially more difficult to deal with fixing it on a 55' versus a 40'.
__________________
Greg

- If animals weren't meant to be eaten then they wouldn't be made of food.
Stumble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2016, 22:42   #18
Registered User
 
TeddyDiver's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arctic Ocean
Boat: Under construction 35' ketch (and +3 smaller)
Posts: 2,762
Images: 2
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenomac View Post
Simply not true. The problems are basically the same when they occur, but the larger the boat, the more forgiving.

Let me provide a good example:

If and when we suffer a complete engine failure in a situation wih no wind and a leward shore and dropping the anchor is not an option, our tender and outboard motor can be launched quickly and are large enough to lash to the side of the boat and become a tow boat or auxilary engine. We can also carry enough fuel for the outboard to do this for many miles. The smaller boat will most likely end up on the rocks.
So will I having the tender in a dinghy bay. Even simpler just tilt the outboard down without launching and drive away or just scull which isn't much of an option with a big boat.
Thou better to approach Tuamotus from the west side..
TeddyDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2016, 22:58   #19
Registered User
 
TeddyDiver's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arctic Ocean
Boat: Under construction 35' ketch (and +3 smaller)
Posts: 2,762
Images: 2
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumble View Post
If you jam the headboard on any boat you have an issue. But it isn't substantially more difficult to deal with fixing it on a 55' versus a 40'.
In some instances the fix must wait and the sail better come down. While it's possible for a single hander to force a smaller sail down a bigger sail needs more power. Downhaul and halyard winch at least..
TeddyDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2016, 23:16   #20
Registered User

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hailing Minny, MN
Boat: Vancouver 27
Posts: 1,090
Images: 1
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

I take the size thing to be pretty insignificant in the scheme of things! If you really want to minimize risk, sure, a bigger boat for the reasons mentioned. But that's really a pretty small piece of the puzzle.

If you have a good boat that you know, whether it's big or small, it was designed to get you there. The rest is overwhelmingly up to you.

If you're on a budget and a smaller boat being cheaper will give you more time to roam once you leave the docks, then maybe you don't have to rush as much and can afford to make better choices along the way.

It all seems very relative to me.
laika is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2016, 23:21   #21
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 392
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockhead View Post
This hits all the nails on their heads.

Size is a tremendous benefit to safety. On top of being harder to capsize, faster, less likely to be swept with green water -- I am surprised no one has mentioned the most important factor of all, the fact that they are harder to fall off of. MOB is the main killer of sailors, so this is a really important benefit.

Unlike some, I have nothing against Beneteaus, but I would avoid the B50, which is pretty notorious for build quality problems, particularly, structural problems, including rudders. You'd be better off with other Bene (or Jenn) models around that size.
I agree about MOBs and the bigger freeboard issue. However, modifications can be made as seen in the photo (70lb dog in the cut out, 43' loa). I am a believer in the bigger older (70s-80s overbuilt f/g) boats being the safest. Bigger should enable keeping the crew more comfortable thus more able-bodied. A lot of the newer, large production boats I find though are not as safe due to their layouts (large cocktail cockpits and below can be too widespread; too focused on dockside wants). Mine here is kevlar epoxy - love having a bullet proof boat!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Hooked Potato Slough.jpg
Views:	287
Size:	390.3 KB
ID:	130037  
sailorcherry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2016, 23:30   #22
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pangaea
Posts: 10,856
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeddyDiver View Post
In some instances the fix must wait and the sail better come down. While it's possible for a single hander to force a smaller sail down a bigger sail needs more power. Downhaul and halyard winch at least..
You forget one important thing, the larger boat has systems in place to prevent these issues which seem to concern you. We have hydraulic or electric furling, I push easy buttons. But in the unlikely event (which has happened twice) a sail needs to come down in a hurry manually, it can be done easily. Manual systems are also in place. So we have both, the smaller boat is likely only manual.

I know of several Swan 65 sloops being handled full time by just one or two people. There's also a fellow on this forum who single hands his Oyster 66.
Kenomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2016, 03:34   #23
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,002
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

I don't think there is any doubt that a typical modern 50' boat of good quality is going to handle rough conditions at least as well as an old full keel 40' boat (yeah, you could come up with an extreme example but in general).


It appears you are proposing it primarily from a cost savings advantage on the initial purchase but remember, if you move up to a 50' boat, your ongoing costs are going to be on the order of 25-50% higher as many services are charged by the foot, hardware prices often increase exponentially, fuel consumption will be higher, etc....


I would decide if you really feel the need for an old style lead bomb or not and then start looking for boats of the style you choose and see if you can get one of a size that meets your other needs along with your budget.
valhalla360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2016, 03:58   #24
Senior Cruiser
 
boatman61's Avatar

Community Sponsor
Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 30,642
Images: 2
pirate Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type



__________________


You can't beat a people up (for 75yrs+) and have them say..
"I Love You.. ". Murray Roman.
Yet the 'useful idiots' of the West still dance to the beat of the apartheid drums.
boatman61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2016, 04:00   #25
Registered User
 
thomm225's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay Area
Boat: Bristol 27
Posts: 10,554
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Der Beek View Post
After the infamous Fastnet race in 79 they looked into this and concluded that boats around 40 feet had fared the best.
Actually, it was found that the more seaworthy boats fared the best. Even smaller boats like the Contessa 32 because of the way they were built. Bal/disp 47%, skeg rudder, etc...

http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=1414
thomm225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2016, 04:32   #26
Registered User
 
JPCorrigan's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Burnt Store Marina, Punta Gorda, Fl
Boat: Cabo Rico 38
Posts: 6
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

I have always heard and stand by that one should have a boat that they can handle alone. Meaning, if you need to have someone with you when sailing the boat may be too large.
JPCorrigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2016, 04:43   #27
Senior Cruiser
 
boatman61's Avatar

Community Sponsor
Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 30,642
Images: 2
pirate Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenomac View Post
Simply not true. The problems are basically the same when they occur, but the larger the boat, the more forgiving.

Let me provide a good example:

If and when we suffer a complete engine failure in a situation wih no wind and a leward shore and dropping the anchor is not an option, our tender and outboard motor can be launched quickly and are large enough to lash to the side of the boat and become a tow boat or auxilary engine. We can also carry enough fuel for the outboard to do this for many miles. The smaller boat will most likely end up on the rocks.
Am curious...
How can one have a 'Lee Shore' when there's no wind..
Or.. is this a bit of 'Drama' thrown in..
Same thing works on smaller boats.. or in the case of a 21ft Corribee.. you row or scull..
__________________


You can't beat a people up (for 75yrs+) and have them say..
"I Love You.. ". Murray Roman.
Yet the 'useful idiots' of the West still dance to the beat of the apartheid drums.
boatman61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2016, 05:12   #28
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pangaea
Posts: 10,856
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by boatman61 View Post
Am curious...
How can one have a 'Lee Shore' when there's no wind..
Or.. is this a bit of 'Drama' thrown in..
Same thing works on smaller boats.. or in the case of a 21ft Corribee.. you row or scull..
OK... Drifting towards shore with little to no wind.
Kenomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2016, 05:15   #29
Registered User
 
TeddyDiver's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arctic Ocean
Boat: Under construction 35' ketch (and +3 smaller)
Posts: 2,762
Images: 2
Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by boatman61 View Post
Am curious...
How can one have a 'Lee Shore' when there's no wind..
Or.. is this a bit of 'Drama' thrown in..
Same thing works on smaller boats.. or in the case of a 21ft Corribee.. you row or scull..
That I can understand, like ocean swell and currents pushing to one direction. Some oldstyle salty without an engine loosed their boat that way thou don't remember which one. It's a long way to get past a big atoll..
TeddyDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2016, 05:24   #30
Senior Cruiser
 
boatman61's Avatar

Community Sponsor
Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 30,642
Images: 2
pirate Re: Blue water yacht, size versus type

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeddyDiver View Post
That I can understand, like ocean swell and currents pushing to one direction. Some oldstyle salty without an engine loosed their boat that way thou don't remember which one. It's a long way to get past a big atoll..
Folks with engines end up on reefs and atolls.. that's just down to seamanship and making a bad choice..
Its a long way to get past N.Spain as well..
Its not What you have.. its how you use it.. as the mother superior said to the pope..
__________________


You can't beat a people up (for 75yrs+) and have them say..
"I Love You.. ". Murray Roman.
Yet the 'useful idiots' of the West still dance to the beat of the apartheid drums.
boatman61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
size, water, yacht


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boston Whaler versus Albury versus ??? Magor Powered Boats 3 26-02-2014 11:43
Repower Engine Size and Type for 40 foot Yacht? Snowpetrel Engines and Propulsion Systems 19 04-03-2013 18:19
Fresh Water Versus Sea Water Toilets Dockhead Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 4 09-02-2012 13:15
Water Heater - What Size / Type ? ozmike Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 8 30-06-2010 14:27

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 16:29.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.