Ocean acidifcation .

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

As a matter of interest, are there any studies using these same species that compares the age of the species to past climatic conditions? That could be enlightening.

Why do you not use a search engine such as Google Scholar? Then you could enlighten us.

https://scholar.google.com/

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by jackdale

It does. But you assumed a value judgement.



BTW - 0°C = 273.15K

With good reason...


And thanks for the lesson in temperature conversation. Is "- 0" actually a number???

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by jackdale

Why do you not use a search engine such as Google Scholar? Then you could enlighten us.



https://scholar.google.com/

Umm, because I doubt there would be. For reasons,

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

That's a pretty disgusting website. Does anyone blame Winchester execs for gun violence?

Yes -

https://www.apnews.com/a4b101a04dc9469999880a61280fd0da

https://www.wsj.com/articles/gun-man...ng-11562181305

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...ootings-225812

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

Umm, because I doubt there would be. For reasons,

A real skeptic would confirm that doubt. A cynic would just assume it without any evidence.

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by ImaginaryNumber

I agreed with you that stomata can be used as a CO2-concentration proxy.

However, the discussion we were having was specifically about what the CO2 levels were about 10K-12K years ago, and whether ice core data was more reliable, or stomata count data. And the most rational conclusion, per the Nature article, is that the ice core data is more reliable.


Yes it does. Starting in the second paragraph.

https://science.sciencemag.org/conte...5446/1815.full

Well, you got me there. My F3 let me down.

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

And thanks for the lesson in temperature conversation. Is "- 0" actually a number???

Yes, "0" is a number, between -1 and 1. http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/63315.html

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by jackdale

Yes -



https://www.apnews.com/a4b101a04dc9469999880a61280fd0da



https://www.wsj.com/articles/gun-man...ng-11562181305



https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...ootings-225812

Do you also credit them for winning world war 2?

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by jackdale

Yes, "0" is a number, between -1 and 1. http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/63315.html

"- 0".

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by jackdale

A real skeptic would confirm that doubt. A cynic would just assume it without any evidence.

Truth be known, I already know the answer to my own question. And let's just say it is indeed enlightening.

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

With good reason...

Check out a colour temperature graph.

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

Truth be known, I already know the answer to my own question. And let's just say it is indeed enlightening.

Please share the answer with the rest of us. I cannot stand the suspense.

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

"- 0".

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by jackdale

Check out a colour temperature graph.

Methinks you confuse colour temperature with graph colouring.

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by jackdale

Please share the answer with the rest of us. I cannot stand the suspense.

Cliff notes. Molluscs are still with us after ~500 million years.