Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Scuttlebutt > Flotsam & Sailing Miscellany
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-11-2010, 06:04   #1
Registered User
 
LakeSuperior's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Boat: Teak Yawl, 37'
Posts: 2,985
Images: 7
A Valid Case for the Return of Clippers

The Shipping Glut Is So Bad Globally That Ships Are Now Sailing Slower Than 19th Century Clippers Just To Keep Busy

Clippers would also reduce amount of greenhouse gases being put into the atmosphere...
LakeSuperior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 06:18   #2
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kingston / Thousand Islands, Ontario
Boat: C&C 35 Mk.II
Posts: 343
At least they won't be quite as quick to sneak up on sailors in the night. Hopefully, slower running won't translate into slower watch-keeping.

The companies behind these ships don't care about the romance of sail, or the environmental benefits. Every decision is made on purely financial grounds. In this situation, there's a fleet of container liners sized for economic boom times, but less demand for its services. Slowing down reduces the per-mile cost (fuel costs far more than crew on a container liner) and also keeps ships from sitting idle: if ships sit idle in port, customers get the impression they can bargain for cheaper rates.

For sail to make a (partial) comeback in the freight field, it'll have to be made cheap enough to compete with bunker-C fuel oil. Downwind kites, already in sea trial on a few small freighters, might be a first step. I doubt we'll see freighters outfitted with the sort of exotic high-tech rigs seen on racing yachts and the $50M-plus pleasure yacht fleet, which means new rig technology would have to evolve that is cheap, durable and easy for a very short-handed crew to manage.

The potential trickle-down to cruisers could be very interesting....
__________________
Matt Marsh
marshmat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 06:22   #3
Long Range Cruiser
 
MarkJ's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australian living on "Sea Life" currently in England.
Boat: Beneteau 393 "Sea Life"
Posts: 12,822
Images: 25
Big ships are definitly moving slower. Mind you I have been TOLD a number of times in the last 3 weeks I am WRONG and ALL container ships move at OVER 25 kts ALWAYS. (The BS here in the Canaries is getting a bit over the top... but also there are some terrific people with wonderful stories!)

I think Reefers (refrigerated cargo) move fairly quickly at 18 or so knots or the bananas etc will ripen. But bulkers, tankers and container ships seem to be ambling along. Most seem to take well over an hour from horizon when on opposing courses.

I don't have AIS (I would dearly love is for this trans atlantic passage, but its double the price here from usa...) but I would think the average would be about 15 kts.

I know we have some ship people here.... what say ye?


Mark
__________________
Notes on a Circumnavigation.
OurLifeAtSea.com

Somalia Pirates and our Convoy
MarkJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 06:47   #4
Registered User
 
fishwife's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South coast of England, moving around a bit.
Boat: Long range motor cruiser
Posts: 750
A quick look at Live Ships Map - AIS - Vessel Traffic and Positions in the English Channel shows very few vessels going faster than 15 knots and many at 10 to 12 knots. Only the Ferries seem to have the pedal to the metal.

P.
__________________
The message is the journey, we are sure the answer lies in the destination. But in reality, there is no station, no place to arrive at once and for all. The joy of life is the trip, and the station is a dream that constantly out distances us”. Robert Hastings, The Station
fishwife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 07:52   #5
Senior Cruiser
 
skipmac's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 29° 49.16’ N 82° 25.82’ W
Boat: Pearson 422
Posts: 16,306
I manage export sales for my company and move cargo mainly from NY to ports in Europe: Rotterdam, Le Havre and Felixstowe. I do keep an eye on shipping details and transit time for my shipments has not increased at all based on ten years of history so I assume the ships we use have not slowed down.

What I am seeing is much higher shipping cost and less space available so have to book space further in advance to get my cargo on board.

I have seen other threads that discuss shipping companies mothballing unused vessels in Asia until demand increases.

This is all going on large container vessels. At the moment I am not moving any liquid bulk shipments that go on large tanker ships so can't comment on tanker speeds. I have a friend that is a ship cargo broker that will certainly know about the issue. Think I will give him a call.

Skip
__________________
The water is always bluer on the other side of the ocean.
Sometimes it's necessary to state the obvious for the benefit of the oblivious.
Rust is the poor man's Loctite.
skipmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 09:37   #6
Long Range Cruiser
 
MarkJ's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australian living on "Sea Life" currently in England.
Boat: Beneteau 393 "Sea Life"
Posts: 12,822
Images: 25
I'd agree that the transit schedules probably havent changed in 10 years, but working smarter instead of harder has been a change in many industries.

Ports that tranship containers were not available 10 years ago; also Australia, for example, had a wharfe dispute because the waterside workers could only load/unload 12 containers per hour where the world rate is 24 and building to 30 per hour.
Ships must have saved many hours there, so though on the same shedule can go slower and cheaper to get there.

Another thing may be if theres 2 captains: both do the same number of miles per year but one captain uses a few thousand tons less fuel. Who is the 'better' captain?
Ships do not leave 5 nms clearence from a headland... they shave the front gate of the Lighthouse keepers cottage. they miss yachts by meters because they don't want to waste fuel going a half a mile out of their way so you feel safer.

Ships Captains should read our threads demanding all to use paper charts because they would have the biggest belly laugh... electronic navigation means they can leave Panama and know precisely what speed they need to do each minute to dock in Japan at 8am next thrusday week when they are sheduled to be there. They don't anchor off the port for 2 days waiting... they just get there on time..

I bet they have a whole range of 'tricks' to save every litre of fuel they can.

__________________
Notes on a Circumnavigation.
OurLifeAtSea.com

Somalia Pirates and our Convoy
MarkJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Italian Captain License Valid ? cla6665 Training, Licensing & Certification 12 23-07-2010 16:53
Planning to Return Subtandard Meets & Greets 7 09-08-2009 17:04
Deposit to Make an Offer 'Valid?' sjpm Dollars & Cents 92 25-07-2009 20:33
So many choices... all valid. I need some advice. ssullivan Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 5 08-12-2004 06:29

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 19:40.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.