Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cate
Afraid I disagree with this statement!!! A number of years ago we were dismasted in our previous boat. We "self rescued" by motoring the 100 miles or so into Manly Qld. The motion without the mass of the mast was HORRIBLE. Roll period was much shorter, roll amplitude was much higher. It was a struggle to move about the boat... and this was not in a severe sea state.
I can not guess whether or not you will like the new motion, but it sure as hell will be different!
Jim |
Very interesting comment, thank you.
Simple physics suggests that the low heavy
keel is counterbalanced by the
mast and rig (and sails). To what degree, is the question.
And I've read elsewhere that your experience is explained by the science of the counterweight, hence my little
experiment.
I know for sure that the boat was originally built to sail. And it stands to reason that it has a long
keel (with cut away front for maneuverability) full of lead ballast and a
water tank for a reason.
The original guy who commissioned it ran out of
money, and the second owner decided to finish it as a
trawler. My theory is that he got rid of it because it didn't
work too well that way. Wrong
hull shape, etc.
I guess I won't really know anything until it is out there in the elements.
Linear Mode
Recent Discussions