Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > General Sailing Forum
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 29-05-2019, 13:34   #16
֍֎֍֎֍֎֍֎֍֎

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,136
Re: Questions about "Next-Gen" Fire Extinguishers

Thanks, Gord. In the link I had looked at, they didn't mention any of the certifications. I guess their profits are too slim to bother hiring technical copywriters.

I know that Kidde had similar issues when they started selling their "Type K" kitchen fire extinguishers, which finally have been approved. (Also very good for boats, since the powder won't rot out appliances and electrical wiring the way the usual yellow stuff does, btw.)
hellosailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2019, 03:56   #17
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 165
Re: Questions about "Next-Gen" Fire Extinguishers

Quote:
Originally Posted by GordMay View Post
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION
Element is a manual, portable aerosol fire extinguisher (Class ABCK). It uses a Potassium powder jet (a unique method among fire extinguishers) that employs the vaporization of the powder in the environment followed by the condensation of its extinguishing substance. Element works by interrupting a fire’s chain of reaction (the “auto-catalyst” of the fire).
The extinguishing agent being used is composed of Potassium Nitrate, organic oxidizer, and plasticizer resin.
When Potassium Nitrate (KNO3) discharges from the extinguisher it vaporizes in the environment followed by the condensation of its extinguishing substance. When it reacts (inside the body of the extinguisher) it breaks down and the aerosol that is formed is made up primarily of free radicals of Potassium K+, of Nitrogen N (an inert gas), and water vapor.
The aerosol that comes out of the unit reacts with the fire. Potassium radicals (K+) capture the Oxygen of the combustion thereby extinguishing it.At the end of the extinguishing process the following is discharged to the atmosphere:As a solid: particles of Potassium (that have reacted with the Oxygen of the fire) having a size between 3-4 microns. These particles are invisible at sight and heavier than air. They disperse in the atmosphere and tend to deposit on the ground in no appreciable amounts. As a gas: As Nitrogen; an inert gas already present in the air we breathe at more or less 78%.As water vapor (and lastly) extremely minimal toxic by-products that are a result of the combustion process.
See ➥ https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/30...67154874779486

Conventional Class K fire extinguishers are filled with a blend of potassium acetate and potassium citrate
Again - I’m not saying they don’t work, I’m saying they cannot work as described.

Potassium is an “alkaline metal” powder it and pour it on a fire (as described in the first line above) it will burn fiercely. It will react, unpleasantly, with the oxygen in the air. The combustion byproduct of potassium is potassium hydroxide, which is highly corrosive- no better than dry chemical residues and potentially worse.

Whatever puts out the fire is not what is described in their words.


Now, it’s entirely possible that it’s contents (and therefore mode of operation) are the same as the maus (thanks for the sds wrwakefield) - potassium nitrate, formaldehyde and melamine. The potassium nitrate allows the melamine and formaldehyde to combust. The combustion byproduct of the melamine and formaldehyde are what extinguish the fire (by both oxygen starvation and chemical interruption, if it was only oxy starvation the fires in their videos would reflash and they don’t seem to.) formaldehyde and melamine combustion byproducts are quite toxic, try not to be exposed to them, don’t re enter any compartment where this has been used until it’s been thoroughly ventilated.


Don’t confuse these kinds of extinguishers with a normal K type - they work very differently- a typical K type extinguisher discharges it’s agent into burning fat and causes chemical changes in the fat to make it essentially a non flammable soapy goo.
mickt243 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2019, 06:15   #18
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,595
Images: 241
Re: Questions about "Next-Gen" Fire Extinguishers

Quote:
Originally Posted by GordMay
... The aerosol that is formed is made up primarily of free radicals of Potassium K+, of Nitrogen N (an inert gas), and water vapor...
They don't just pour Potassium Nitrate on the fire.
I'm no chemist, so don't know if the above makes any difference.
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2019, 07:19   #19
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,126
Re: Questions about "Next-Gen" Fire Extinguishers

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickt243 View Post
Again - I’m not saying they don’t work, I’m saying they cannot work as described.

Potassium is an “alkaline metal” powder it and pour it on a fire (as described in the first line above) it will burn fiercely. It will react, unpleasantly, with the oxygen in the air. The combustion byproduct of potassium is potassium hydroxide, which is highly corrosive- no better than dry chemical residues and potentially worse.

Whatever puts out the fire is not what is described in their words.


Now, it’s entirely possible that it’s contents (and therefore mode of operation) are the same as the maus (thanks for the sds wrwakefield) - potassium nitrate, formaldehyde and melamine. The potassium nitrate allows the melamine and formaldehyde to combust. The combustion byproduct of the melamine and formaldehyde are what extinguish the fire (by both oxygen starvation and chemical interruption, if it was only oxy starvation the fires in their videos would reflash and they don’t seem to.)
Maybe consider reviewing aerosol fire suppression chemistry? I wouldn't try to extrapolate much from the marketing splash message as it is written.
Singularity is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: BIG Fire Extinguishers - Very Inexpensive! Doug Brown Classifieds Archive 2 31-03-2014 04:17
Foam Fire Extinguishers redsky49 General Sailing Forum 3 02-09-2013 06:34
CG approved fire extinguishers @ Orchard Supply HW $18.95ea Deepdraft General Sailing Forum 0 12-05-2013 18:02
CG inspection and fire extinguishers JusDreaming Health, Safety & Related Gear 17 27-04-2013 12:45
LOOKING FOR FOAM FIRE EXTINGUISHERS Roy M Health, Safety & Related Gear 2 21-04-2008 11:52

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:31.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.