Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Scuttlebutt > Emergency, Disaster and Distress
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-08-2019, 07:01   #1
cruiser

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Caribbean
Boat: Living the dream - New Gunboat 55
Posts: 252
Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

https://www.onlyinyourstate.com/main...6H_amoYuO8lZEA

There is an excellent map about 1/2 way into the article which shows the problem around the US and Puerto Rico. From my personal experience most of the islands throughout the Caribbean with any notable population has this problem. Waste, sewage and related pollution is a major problem and while I do my best to avoid such areas it is not always possible.

SeaQuest OE II
TigerPaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 07:30   #2
Registered User
 
Cheechako's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Skagit City, WA
Posts: 25,526
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

No doubt about it. Most enclosed harbors are pretty bad in the Caribe. Much of the US problem seems to be the actual sewage plants any more. Or at least one is left with that indication.
__________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Broads and Boats. The rest I wasted" - Elmore Leonard











Cheechako is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 14:53   #3
cruiser

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Caribbean
Boat: Living the dream - New Gunboat 55
Posts: 252
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Unfortunately poor sewage treatment and control throughout the Caribbean is the norm, the islands are usually poor with the resorts ruling the roost.

Corruption is beyond rampant.
TigerPaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 15:08   #4
Registered User
 
StuM's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Port Moresby,Papua New Guinea
Boat: FP Belize Maestro 43 and OPBs
Posts: 12,891
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Note the repeated use of "potentially dangerous". Traveling to the beach in the first place is also "potentially dangerous". Probably more so



How much does this reflect "nanny state"ism rather than actual danger?
StuM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 15:08   #5
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newport News VA
Boat: Egg Harbor sedan cruiser 1970
Posts: 958
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Whatever you do, dont pump overboard waste and it wont make any difference whether you do or dont to water quality. Just let the cities and towns do that because they do and they can. If they find your doing it, you will get a big fine. Someone has to get the blame, so why not you boaters.
sdowney717 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 15:22   #6
cruiser

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Caribbean
Boat: Living the dream - New Gunboat 55
Posts: 252
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdowney717 View Post
Whatever you do, dont pump overboard waste and it wont make any difference whether you do or dont to water quality. Just let the cities and towns do that because they do and they can. If they find your doing it, you will get a big fine. Someone has to get the blame, so why not you boaters.
Pumping overboard in port is beyond gross, I have never seen a serious cruiser do so.

I have seen far too may Europeans on self charter boats taking a dump over the transom or off the swim platform, men and women. I have seen all sorts of dumping by these people. I avoid their hangouts because they are nasty, loud, drunk and gross. The charter companies are just as much to blame because of the extra fees for pump-out and cleaning when the boat is returned.


SeaQuest OE II
TigerPaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 15:38   #7
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 7,486
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

'Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water..."

Eewwww!

https://gph.is/2hrLDDT
Montanan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 15:42   #8
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 349
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Tampa Bay:


https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/ne...st--petersburg


St. Petersburg spilled nearly 200 million gallons of raw or partially treated sewage in Tampa Bay in 2015 and 2016.
WSMFP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 15:46   #9
cruiser

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Caribbean
Boat: Living the dream - New Gunboat 55
Posts: 252
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSMFP View Post
Tampa Bay:


https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/ne...st--petersburg


St. Petersburg spilled nearly 200 million gallons of raw or partially treated sewage in Tampa Bay in 2015 and 2016.
And people wonder where the flesh eating bacteria is coming from.
TigerPaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 16:16   #10
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,955
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerPaws View Post
And people wonder where the flesh eating bacteria is coming from.



And why red tide is a problem.
letsgetsailing3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2019, 08:17   #11
Registered User
 
Scout 30's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida
Boat: Scout 30
Posts: 3,112
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Birds are actually the main cause of high fecal bacteria counts on beaches.
Scout 30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2019, 08:22   #12
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 7,486
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

FYI.

Maine beaches appear to be comparatively clean versus Texass beaches.

Report by CBS Austin, Wednesday, July 24th 2019

More than 4 out of 5 Texas beaches had unsafe levels of fecal bacteria in the water, according to new research.

A study released by Environment Texas found that 85% of the state's beaches had water pollution levels in 2018 that could put swimmers at risk of becoming sick.

Human contact with the contaminated water can result in gastrointestinal illness as well as respiratory disease, ear and eye infections, and skin rash.

The worst levels were found at Cole Park - Site 3 in Corpus Christi. Out of 64 days samples were taken, 52 of those days were deemed "unsafe."

In Chambers County, near Houston, the average beach was potentially unsafe for swimming on 44% of the days that sampling took place, a higher percentage than any other county in the state.

To read the full report, click here. https://environmenttexas.org/feature/ame/safe-swimming
Montanan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2019, 08:24   #13
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pangaea
Posts: 10,856
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerPaws View Post
Pumping overboard in port is beyond gross, I have never seen a serious cruiser do so.

I have seen far too may Europeans on self charter boats taking a dump over the transom or off the swim platform, men and women. I have seen all sorts of dumping by these people. I avoid their hangouts because they are nasty, loud, drunk and gross. The charter companies are just as much to blame because of the extra fees for pump-out and cleaning when the boat is returned.


SeaQuest OE II
Then its best for you to avoid anchoring anywhere near us.
Kenomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2019, 08:30   #14
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Boat: Watkins 29
Posts: 409
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSMFP View Post
Tampa Bay:


https://www.baynews9.com/fl/tampa/ne...st--petersburg


St. Petersburg spilled nearly 200 million gallons of raw or partially treated sewage in Tampa Bay in 2015 and 2016.
Ft.Lauderdale had a major sewage leak that found its way into the New River, just about a year ago.

Then there are the offshore sewage "bubblers" from the water treatment plant that supposedly has pretreated water dumping into the ocean...Ive lived in South Florida since 1955, but wont go near the beach.
dennismenace111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2019, 09:01   #15
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,462
Images: 241
Re: Fecal Bacteria Unsafe Levels On 33% of Beaches

Quote:
Originally Posted by StuM View Post
... How much does this reflect "nanny state"ism rather than actual danger?
Anyone who supports rules and regulations, that make products safer or improve public health, can expect to come under attack from critics, arguing they’re restricting freedom and turning the country into a “nanny state”. The threat to freedom, posed by an emergent nanny state, is a powerful, though superficial, piece of rhetoric.
However, as a description of reality it doesn’t quite add up.
Of course, as a citizen you can’t always do what you want; you need to compromise with your neighbours.
For instance:
In the nineteenth century, sewage systems were installed, by the democratic government of the UK, to protect people’s health; people were no longer free to allow raw sewerage to seep into their neighbours’ gardens, but was that a freedom worth having?
Well, some thought it important. In response to Edwin Chadwick’s Public Health Act*, the Times thundered:
“... We prefer to take our chance with cholera and the rest than be bullied into health. There is nothing a man hates so much as being cleansed against his will, or having his floors swept, his walls whitewashed, his pet dung heaps cleared away ...”

Effective sewage treatment would bring significant costs to municipalities, resulting in increased taxes. Notwithstanding, legislating requirements for such, might have considerable economic and public health benefits.
Nany-stateism, or just prudent public policy?


* ➥ https://www.parliament.uk/about/livi...ic-health-act/

“The 1848 Public Health Act and its relevance to improving public health in England now” ~ by Kenneth Calman
https://www.bmj.com/content/317/7158/596
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cal


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unsafe Skipper, Mission Beach Dive Hickers Seamanship & Boat Handling 1 25-07-2016 11:45
RO Water Quality and Bacteria phorvati Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 15 17-07-2010 14:37
Spade Anchor Unsafe - Remedy ? GordMay Health, Safety & Related Gear 37 04-04-2009 00:19
crank-starting a diesel engine- Safe or Unsafe spaceballs Engines and Propulsion Systems 17 04-09-2008 01:18

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 21:45.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.