Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-09-2021, 10:54   #61
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 488
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinwater View Post
A big fire starts in the engine bay, blocking the companionway. You are in the V-berth. The dinghy is lashed on the foredeck, blocking the hatch....


Not too different from the dive boat fire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_MV_Conception
Big fire? Stairs likely burned through or halfway there. Smoke is probably banked down to damn near the floor.

You really only have two options:

1) Get low and fight it like your life depends on it—EEBD would be huge here. Hopefully get a quick knockdown and then vent, staying on top of any rekindles until you can climb out.
2) Give up and die.

An ounce of prevention though...smoke detectors and unobstructed exits.
C420sailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2021, 11:33   #62
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Boat: Dream 45'
Posts: 55
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Hello everyone,

I have noticed little mention to the dangers of smoke inhalation, particularly the smoke from all those boat resins, oils, and other products.

Anyone able to add more info on that?

How effective is to have a mask ready with each fire extinguisher, to protect eyes and lungs?

Cheers
iabmatos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2021, 13:58   #63
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BC
Boat: O'Day 40
Posts: 1,083
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

I'm thinking that the BlazeCut Automatic Fire System is a cheap solution for the engine compartment.

https://avrparts.com/products/blaze-...ression-system

Any comments from the experts?
__________________
Trying to make new mistakes.
bcboomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2021, 21:48   #64
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 303
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

You have taken some significant liberties in your opening arguments specifically the opposition of the fire service to fire sprinkler systems. Beyond that I would not bother with a CO or foam extinguisher. CO is not effective with reigniting situations of which anything burning on a boat would be significant . Foam extinguishers of any size you would have on a boat does not give the needed coverage needed and who’s going to be able to fight a flammable liquid fire inside of a boat without protection. I don’t have any input on Purple K agents but I do with dry chem. If you can’t get it out with 5lb ( pretty big for a boat) or a couple 2.5lbs.....you are not going to get it out due to the conditions you are in when applying them. You probably won’t enable to get close enough regardless unless in a very incipient phase. The key is getting it out quickly with something that will not allow it to reignite and have the ability to do it from several locations. 30 years professional fire service....
MikeHoncho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2021, 21:51   #65
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 303
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Quote:
Originally Posted by iabmatos View Post
Hello everyone,

I have noticed little mention to the dangers of smoke inhalation, particularly the smoke from all those boat resins, oils, and other products.

Anyone able to add more info on that?

How effective is to have a mask ready with each fire extinguisher, to protect eyes and lungs?

Cheers
Proper filters help but do not add O2 to the mix. If you need a mask then you’ll need O2 given the confined spaces of a boat. Heat is a equal challenge for these types of fire.
MikeHoncho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2021, 01:34   #66
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 326
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Quote:
Originally Posted by iabmatos View Post
Hello everyone,

I have noticed little mention to the dangers of smoke inhalation, particularly the smoke from all those boat resins, oils, and other products.

Anyone able to add more info on that?

How effective is to have a mask ready with each fire extinguisher, to protect eyes and lungs?

Cheers
Carbon Monoxide is lethal, Superheated air is also not your friend, all the others stuff, plastics, oils, are not as bad. You just choke on it.
Firefighters concern themelves long term effects of repeated exposures to this stuff. But this thread is about one-offs.
Russian007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2021, 01:00   #67
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Caribbean
Boat: Oyster 66
Posts: 1,339
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

A video showing how fast fire can spread. A seemingly spontaneous fire in an unoccupied boat :
https://youtu.be/l2xBYqtWcDs?t=431
poiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2021, 10:23   #68
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 303
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russian007 View Post
all the others stuff, plastics, oils, are not as bad. You just choke on it.
.
not correct. hydrogen cyanide is a significant element of the combustion of plastics and hydrocarbons. Short term exposures (acute) to these products along with C0 and others are significantly more dangerous that long term (chronic). Its all about time/dose relationships.
MikeHoncho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2021, 13:00   #69
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 326
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeHoncho View Post
not correct. hydrogen cyanide is a significant element of the combustion of plastics and hydrocarbons. Short term exposures (acute) to these products along with C0 and others are significantly more dangerous that long term (chronic). Its all about time/dose relationships.
That doesn't make sense. A once in a lifetime exposure to toxic smoke is worse than weekly exposure over 30 years to the same products? So the reason firefighters have higher rates of lung cancer is just that first breath of smoke from the auto fire on their first day on the job? Not the exposure to toxins from hundreds of fires over 30 years of a career?
Russian007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2021, 15:55   #70
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Flagler County, FL, USA, Earth
Boat: Lagoon 380
Posts: 1,503
Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Quote:
Originally Posted by C420sailor View Post
Deionized (distilled) water doesn’t conduct electricity.


Wished u hadn’t put the word distilled in the sentence. DI water is demineralized, but more pertinent to this thread; its had its H+ and OH- ions removed too. It also needs to be stored with care. DI water is not particularly stable, and there are a number of ways to make those ions again even in closed containers.
team karst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2021, 17:23   #71
Moderator
 
Jammer's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Boat: Tartan 3800
Posts: 4,866
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Quote:
Originally Posted by team karst View Post
Wished u hadn’t put the word distilled in the sentence. DI water is demineralized, but more pertinent to this thread; its had its H+ and OH- ions removed too. It also needs to be stored with care. DI water is not particularly stable, and there are a number of ways to make those ions again even in closed containers.

I studied chemistry for a number of years.


I did not study it long enough to understand how the H+ and OH- ions can be removed from water. Perhaps someone with a better understanding can enlighten me.
__________________
The best part of an adventure is the people you meet.
Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2021, 20:57   #72
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 303
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russian007 View Post
That doesn't make sense. A once in a lifetime exposure to toxic smoke is worse than weekly exposure over 30 years to the same products? So the reason firefighters have higher rates of lung cancer is just that first breath of smoke from the auto fire on their first day on the job? Not the exposure to toxins from hundreds of fires over 30 years of a career?
Absolutely it does when it kills you with that first and only dose. I’m not discounting the chronic exposure but it seemed that you may have been with the acute. I’ll take the possibility of cancer over being dead if I had a choice. GI and skin cancer tends to be the going cancer for FFs. Not inhaled but ingested and absorbed. For the record I concern myself with all exposures.......professional firefighter and hazmat tech.
MikeHoncho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2021, 22:15   #73
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 326
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeHoncho View Post
Absolutely it does when it kills you with that first and only dose. I’m not discounting the chronic exposure but it seemed that you may have been with the acute. I’ll take the possibility of cancer over being dead if I had a choice. GI and skin cancer tends to be the going cancer for FFs. Not inhaled but ingested and absorbed. For the record I concern myself with all exposures.......professional firefighter and hazmat tech.
The word I used was "choking". Choking is not a good thing. Choking is bad. The comment was meant tongue and cheek.
For the record, I cut a few teeth in some of the busiest houses in the country. Two guys I worked with in those assignments, literally from my shift, recently passed from cancer. Not even 60 yet. On a personal level? I finish my Chemo Oct 10th. The job takes a toll. We know what we signed up for. "Absorbed and Ingested"? So the issue is sunscreen and high fiber diets to keep guys safe? There is still a lot of mystery regarding causes of cancer. Stay in your lane Jefe. You're a fire chief not an Oncology chief.
Russian007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2021, 23:21   #74
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Boat: Island Packet 40
Posts: 6,464
Images: 7
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

Quote:
Originally Posted by skipperpete View Post
I have a feeling that water mist systems are going to be adopted by the yachting community in the near future and are already replacing Co2 systems on commercial vessels. In the near future, container ships may even adopt a system of misting each individual TEU on deck and possibly inerting the below decks spaces. The increasing number of ships lost to container fires...... and the motivation to adopt better suppression systems, is likely to come from the insurance industry.
I like the idea of water misting systems and the devices to implement a DIY system are readily available these days from the folks who manufacture agricultural or horticultural spraying systems.

About as nasty a fire extinguishing problem as you would want to handle is oil and gas well fires. Red Adair used barrels full of dynamite to put them out but modern well fire fighters use streams of water.

When you get enough water going into the oil or gas stream blowing from the well it drops the temperature below the ignition temperature and the fire goes out. One of them told me that you have to get the water into the right spot in the column and you cannot really see where this is but you can hear it if you know what to listen for.
__________________
Satiriker ist verboten, la conformité est obligatoire
RaymondR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-09-2021, 06:49   #75
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 459
Re: Rethinking attitudes towards fire suppression

A vessel needs to be properly equipped for THAT vessel. If a wood vessel, water. If a plastic vessel , water not the best choice, etc.
But whatever the choice, education of how to use and the limits of the equipment is paramount.
The majority of destructive fires occur because because of human errors- poor knowledge of how to use the available equipment, incorrect or inoperable equipment, poor understanding of fire development, and panic to escape before responding.
Last month the destruction of a super yacht in the UK because 1) candles to close to flammable material , inoperable fire detection equipment , and therefore inoperable suppression system.
Education and awareness will improve the safety dramatically.
boat driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Latitudes and Attitudes - hit by fire disaster Bay Breeze Our Community 9 17-09-2020 14:58
Fire Suppression For Fun & Profit RaymondR Health, Safety & Related Gear 8 19-06-2020 11:55
Fire Suppression Systems Alterboy 65 Liveaboard's Forum 19 17-01-2020 02:26

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:50.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.