Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-03-2015, 22:52   #31
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Currently Tasmania after Pacific crossing
Boat: Catalina 42
Posts: 255
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt. Don View Post
Has anyone here ever tried the capt. Don boom brake?

I sure have...and here it is 6 months after installing! Nice eh?Click image for larger version

Name:	ImageUploadedByCruisers Sailing Forum1425966743.412591.jpg
Views:	623
Size:	40.2 KB
ID:	98614


Sent from my iPad using Cruisers Sailing Forum
Amnesia II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2015, 05:09   #32
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 14
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

Ouch, that looks bad. Can you take it down and rub the surface rust off with a Scotch bright pad then wax it. If that does not work then I will replace it.
Please contact me at sales@dreamgreen.org
Thanks
Don
Capt. Don is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-03-2015, 13:33   #33
Registered User
 
Boatyarddog's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Olympia, Washington
Boat: 1979 Mariner Ketch 32-Hull 202
Posts: 2,124
Images: 2
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

Quote:
Originally Posted by SimonV View Post
+1 on the Dutchman boom break. I too would never own a boat without one. By having the control lines as far forward as possible , mine are on the rail short of the mast it makes a great preventer and if things go belly up it allows the jibe but controlled.

Sent from my GT-N7105T using Cruisers Sailing Forum mobile app

Yes, the Dutchman Boom Brake is great, it also can be a preventer if you want.
Slides the boom across, safely in a Gybe and allows freedom for single handing.
That's important.


Sent from my iPad SV Cloud Duster
Boatyarddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-04-2015, 18:47   #34
Moderator Emeritus
 
roverhi's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Boat: 1976 Sabre 28-2
Posts: 7,505
Send a message via Yahoo to roverhi
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

__________________
Peter O.
'Ae'a, Pearson 35
'Ms American Pie', Sabre 28 Mark II
roverhi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-04-2015, 11:29   #35
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Victoria BC
Boat: Cal 2-46'
Posts: 672
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

My cal 2-46 came with a Dutchman break but not installed
While I've been focused on other aspects of a major refit I have not given much thought to installing it beyond thinking I would like to. Can anyone provide details or tips in installation?
Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Cruisers Sailing Forum
__________________
Nick & John
Ground Tackle Marine Ltd
groundtackle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-04-2015, 11:33   #36
Registered User
 
delmarrey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philippines in the winters
Boat: It’s in French Polynesia now
Posts: 11,368
Images: 122
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

Quote:
Originally Posted by nshawdvm View Post
My cal 2-46 came with a Dutchman break but not installed
While I've been focused on other aspects of a major refit I have not given much thought to installing it beyond thinking I would like to. Can anyone provide details or tips in installation?
Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Cruisers Sailing Forum
It's pretty simple. Just make sure your deck attachments are over kill. Here's the instruction manual>>>>.
http://dutchmar.com/wp-content/uploa...3/10/BB_om.pdf
__________________
Faithful are the Wounds of a Friend, but the Kisses of the Enemy are Deceitful! ........
The measure of a man is how he navigates to a proper shore in the midst of a storm!
delmarrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-04-2015, 12:24   #37
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Victoria BC
Boat: Cal 2-46'
Posts: 672
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

That's very helpful
Thanks
Nick


Sent from my iPhone using Cruisers Sailing Forum
__________________
Nick & John
Ground Tackle Marine Ltd
groundtackle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-04-2015, 21:25   #38
Registered User
 
Boatyarddog's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Olympia, Washington
Boat: 1979 Mariner Ketch 32-Hull 202
Posts: 2,124
Images: 2
Boom Brake vs Preventer

Had no issues installing mine, attached it to the mast hound between the vang boom bail, and the Mast base.
Brake line attached to port side chain plate, and starboard chain plate, led to cleat by small blocks, attached to the stanchions bases, led to cockpit.


Sent from my iPad SV Cloud Duster
Boatyarddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-04-2015, 23:18   #39
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: sydney, australia
Boat: 38 roberts ketch
Posts: 1,309
Images: 3
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

my boom brake is based on the wichard/gybe easy style - i had to experiment with a number of different sizes of rope before settling on 8mm which is probably because my unit is home made - I'd hope the pro manufactured ones allow a bit heavier rope - because my boat is small, has a ketch rig hence quite a small main, the 8mm seems to be more than adequate but I think i'd want a bit bigger diameter on a bigger rig...
charliehows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2015, 09:47   #40
Registered User
 
Hogan's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: La Paz - sorta
Boat: PSC Flicka 20
Posts: 87
Images: 11
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

My boom brake cost about $14, along with some spare line, a couple of shackles and a turning block - here's how I rigged it up on my Catalina 30 -

The main component is a Black Diamond figure 8 rappelling device. It's aluminum, and rated for over 3000 lbs working load. I rig it in line with the boomvang, above it, and lead the friction line through it down to a traveler car mounted all the way forward on my Genoa track to starboard, and to a turning block on the port Genoa track, back through a deck block to a cockpit clutch and cabin top winch.

The initial lead is slightly forward of the brake, allowing it act as a soft preventer - under high tension it basically locks the boom in place, you ease the tension to predetermined points to Gybe in various wind speeds.

There are many advantages and a few disadvantage to this system -

Pros:

Cheap

Simple

Acts as brake and/or preventer based on line tension

Easy to Gybe single handed - main is self tending if properly tensioned.

Cons:

One more line in cockpit

Tripping hazard when going to the mast presented by port and starboard friction lines.


Properly rigged and managed, the friction line and associated fittings see no shock loading, only tension loading and friction.

The main advantage is that once set, the system is fail-safe - it won't allow a Gybe until you are deep by-the-lee, and when the boom comes around it does so slowly and smoothly.

It is much safer than a hard preventer, because it can't break the boom or tear out fittings if the boom hits the water, and in a round-DOWN (broach to leeward) the boom and main will Gybe rather than pinning the hull down broadside to the sea, risking down flooding and sinking in the bargain.

Anyone running hard preventers better be prepared to quickly release them in a leeward broach, or cut the line quickly.

I always dreaded running and gybing single handed until I rigged up this system on my Flicka 20.

Afterwards, it became an absolute blast in strong winds and big seas - if my destination was dead downwind, I would simply broad reach on alternating tacks, essentially slaloming downwind.

Less chance of an accidental gybe with the wind on the quarter, safer surfing down big seas, less chance of broaching, and similar if not better VMG. Again, if you do manage to get it sideways and Gybe, you'll have much less main sheet out than running, along with tension on the friction line.

I sailed that Flicka 1000 miles from LA La Paz in 2012, the boom brake worked flawlessly as a preventer - the trip was mostly a starboard tack broad reach.

As always, you should reef the main at the appropriate wind speed for your boat, and strike it altogether and broad reach under reefed Genoa or jib if things really pipe up.

As mentioned by others, this set-up in combination with a topping lift also dampens movement and stabilizes the boom with the main furled.


Gybing is all about managing energy, sailing about getting your boat in harmony with the wind and sea. This means carrying the right amount of sail first, and managing it second.

I see far too many boats sailing around Santa Monica bay on their ears when the wind picks up because the skippers either don't know how or are too lazy to reef.

It's tempting but dangerous to carry too much sail downwind, especially short-handed. It's very difficult to reef an overloaded main off the wind, and heading up exposes the rig to the true wind speed plus your velocity.


Point is, managing a sailboat off the wind involves many things. A simple, reliable boom brake is a great addition, just don't neglect basic seamanship because it's suddenly so easy to gybe, or eventually you'll paint yourself into an ugly corner!


Sent from my iPhone using Cruisers Sailing Forum
Hogan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2015, 10:24   #41
Registered User
 
Boatyarddog's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Olympia, Washington
Boat: 1979 Mariner Ketch 32-Hull 202
Posts: 2,124
Images: 2
Boom Brake vs Preventer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hogan View Post
My boom brake cost about $14, along with some spare line, a couple of shackles and a turning block - here's how I rigged it up on my Catalina 30 -

The main component is a Black Diamond figure 8 rappelling device. It's aluminum, and rated for over 3000 lbs working load. I rig it in line with the boomvang, above it, and lead the friction line through it down to a traveler car mounted all the way forward on my Genoa track to starboard, and to a turning block on the port Genoa track, back through a deck block to a cockpit clutch and cabin top winch.

The initial lead is slightly forward of the brake, allowing it act as a soft preventer - under high tension it basically locks the boom in place, you ease the tension to predetermined points to Gybe in various wind speeds.

There are many advantages and a few disadvantage to this system -

Pros:

Cheap

Simple

Acts as brake and/or preventer based on line tension

Easy to Gybe single handed - main is self tending if properly tensioned.

Cons:

One more line in cockpit

Tripping hazard when going to the mast presented by port and starboard friction lines.


Properly rigged and managed, the friction line and associated fittings see no shock loading, only tension loading and friction.

The main advantage is that once set, the system is fail-safe - it won't allow a Gybe until you are deep by-the-lee, and when the boom comes around it does so slowly and smoothly.

It is much safer than a hard preventer, because it can't break the boom or tear out fittings if the boom hits the water, and in a round-DOWN (broach to leeward) the boom and main will Gybe rather than pinning the hull down broadside to the sea, risking down flooding and sinking in the bargain.

Anyone running hard preventers better be prepared to quickly release them in a leeward broach, or cut the line quickly.

I always dreaded running and gybing single handed until I rigged up this system on my Flicka 20.

Afterwards, it became an absolute blast in strong winds and big seas - if my destination was dead downwind, I would simply broad reach on alternating tacks, essentially slaloming downwind.

Less chance of an accidental gybe with the wind on the quarter, safer surfing down big seas, less chance of broaching, and similar if not better VMG. Again, if you do manage to get it sideways and Gybe, you'll have much less main sheet out than running, along with tension on the friction line.

I sailed that Flicka 1000 miles from LA La Paz in 2012, the boom brake worked flawlessly as a preventer - the trip was mostly a starboard tack broad reach.

As always, you should reef the main at the appropriate wind speed for your boat, and strike it altogether and broad reach under reefed Genoa or jib if things really pipe up.

As mentioned by others, this set-up in combination with a topping lift also dampens movement and stabilizes the boom with the main furled.


Gybing is all about managing energy, sailing about getting your boat in harmony with the wind and sea. This means carrying the right amount of sail first, and managing it second.

I see far too many boats sailing around Santa Monica bay on their ears when the wind picks up because the skippers either don't know how or are too lazy to reef.

It's tempting but dangerous to carry too much sail downwind, especially short-handed. It's very difficult to reef an overloaded main off the wind, and heading up exposes the rig to the true wind speed plus your velocity.


Point is, managing a sailboat off the wind involves many things. A simple, reliable boom brake is a great addition, just don't neglect basic seamanship because it's suddenly so easy to gybe, or eventually you'll paint yourself into an ugly corner!


Sent from my iPhone using Cruisers Sailing Forum

Point is, managing a sailboat off the wind involves many things. A simple, reliable boom brake is a great addition, just don't neglect basic seamanship because it's suddenly so easy to gybe, or eventually you'll paint yourself into a corner.



Sent from my iPad SV Cloud Duster
Boatyarddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2015, 09:46   #42
Registered User
 
SimonV's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 1,338
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

I am all for keeping things cheap and cheerful, but a boom break is safety equipment and that I don't mind paying for. Also a boom on a 40 footer is different from a 26 footer.

Sent from my GT-N7105T using Cruisers Sailing Forum mobile app
__________________
Simon

Bavaria 50 Cruiser
SimonV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2015, 10:33   #43
Registered User
 
Hogan's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: La Paz - sorta
Boat: PSC Flicka 20
Posts: 87
Images: 11
Re: Boom Brake vs Preventer

True that...much higher loads on a bigger boat carrying more sail.

Still, the goal is the same - control / prevent boom movement, so the same principals apply, but you are contending with higher loads, so your hardware must be scaled up accordingly.

Commercial solutions certainly are available, and all things considered are relatively cheap, it's just that I'm cheaper. The $300 dollars I saved can fix my broken macerator and screwed up head.

Whichever way you go, I think some sort of boom control strategy is critical for safety at sea, at least on a cruising or pleasure boat. Active control is good, passive / automatic better yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Cruisers Sailing Forum
Hogan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.