Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 30-05-2010, 08:37   #16
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 149
This is a good website to check data and compare boats:
Sail Calculator Pro v3.53 - 2000+ boats

The Tartan 37 is in the list. You can also input the data for your subject boat and make comparisons of data and the assortment of calculated factors and ratios.

Info given there for the T37 includes:
Disp = 16,278
Sail Area = 658
SA/Disp = 16.39
Disp/LWL = 278
Motion Comfort = 28.97

There's plenty of debate about the value of the MC ratio calculation, but there's the data.

~
Jim D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 23:10   #17
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 128
Thanks Jim D, Is 28.97 good? I use to have a list that compared various boats. Seems to me this is a bit on the low side for comfort. If I recall correctly some were as high as 48. Is that correct? I wish I could find that list.
Solosailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2010, 04:01   #18
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,462
Images: 241
Motion Comfort Ratio was developed by Boat Designer Ted Brewer. The formula predicts the speed of the upward and downward motion of the boat as it encounters waves and swells. The faster the motion the more uncomfortable the passengers. Thus, the formula predicts the overall comfort of a boat when it is underway. Higher values denote a more comfortable ride. As the Displacement increases the motion comfort ratio will increase. As the length and beam increases the motion comfort ratio will decrease.

Here’s what Ted Brewer has to say about CR:

"COMFORT RATIO (CR): This is a ratio that I dreamed up, tongue-in-cheek, as a measure of motion comfort but it has been widely accepted and, indeed, does provide a reasonable comparison between yachts of similar type. It is based on the fact that the faster the motion the more upsetting it is to the average person. Given a wave of X height, the speed of the upward motion depends on the displacement of the yacht and the amount of waterline area that is acted upon. Greater displacement, or lesser WL area, gives a slower motion and more comfort for any given sea state.

Beam does enter into it as as wider beam increases stability, increases WL area, and generates a faster reaction. The formula takes into account the displacement, the WL area, and adds a beam factor. The intention is to provide a means to compare the motion comfort of vessels of similar type and size, not to compare that of a Lightning class sloop with that of a husky 50 foot ketch.

The CR is : Displacement in pounds/ (.65 x (.7 LWL + .3 LOA) x B1.333).

Ratios will vary from 5.0 for a light daysailer to the high 60s for a super heavy vessel, such as a Colin Archer ketch. Moderate and successful ocean cruisers, such as the Valiant 40 and Whitby 42, will fall into the low-middle 30s range.

Do consider, though, that a sailing yacht heeled by a good breeze will have a much steadier motion than one bobbing up and down in light airs on left over swells from yesterday's blow; also that the typical summertime coastal cruiser will rarely encounter the wind and seas that an ocean going yacht will meet. Nor will one human stomach keep down what another stomach will handle with relish, or with mustard and pickles for that matter! It is all relative..."


More Here ➥ Ted Brewer Yacht Design
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2010, 04:59   #19
Registered User
 
bloodhunter's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Baltimore MD
Boat: Morgan 45 Enchantress
Posts: 171
Images: 11
Solo
Sorry I didn't answer sooner. As I remember it the displacement was about 16000. Also I'm no believer in the comfort ratio figures. But from my experience sailing from the Chesapeake to New England when the wind was light to moderate (10kts or less) the boaty did not have a really smooth motion in the seaway. Hard to describe but it seemed that we wave would pick her up and we'd get a bounce coming down. In heavier winds the modtion was smoother but still not near as smooth as in my previous boat a C&C 40. Wonder if it being a keel/centerboard boat instead of a fixed keel that made the difference.
Enchantress has a much smoother ride, even in chop but she's a much bigger boat with a full keel
__________________


SV Enchantress
located Herrington Harbour South, Friendship MD
Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof
bloodhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2010, 16:41   #20
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim D View Post

Info given there for the T37 includes:
Disp = 16,278
Sail Area = 658
SA/Disp = 16.39
Disp/LWL = 278
Motion Comfort = 28.97

There's plenty of debate about the value of the MC ratio calculation, but there's the data.

~

I was absolutely NOT kidding when I wrote that the value and application of Motion Comfort ratio was subject to debate. Personally, I think SA/D and D/LWL are much more useful ratios for comparing boats.

However, the MC ratio is out there, and the website for which I provided a link will either provide all the data for a long list of boats, or will calculate the assorted factors if you input the measurements for any boat.

One thing that's fun to explore is doing sensitivity tests of your own using the calculator site, to gain knowledge of what changes have the greater impacts; like you can increase the displacement by 500 pounds and see how all the calculated numbers change.

For me, all the data is interesting, even MC, as it gives you directional indications when comparing two boats against each other. Such relational comparisons are likely more insightful than is the absolute value of any given calculation. For example - I suspect we can all mostly agree that a yacht with SA/D of 12 will be a lot slower and harder to get going in light air than another one with SA/D of 20. That's what I mean. And if I want to think about a boat with which I am completely unfamiliar, then checking these ratios gives me an indication of what I might expect.

Solo mentioned he "used to have a list". Well - such a list is essentially provided right in that calculation website.

~
Jim D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2010, 21:10   #21
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 128
Well this is all academic at this point. I did more home work last night and the said boat has a Volvo MD11C diesel. I suspect it's NFG at this point so who knows were this sale will go now? But I would like to thank everybody for their input. Buying a good boat at a reasonable or good price in the right place at the right time is difficult. It seems I keep missing the boat so to speak.
Solosailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tartan 34 maui Monohull Sailboats 3 02-02-2014 14:17
Tartan Solosailor Monohull Sailboats 3 14-05-2009 18:19
Tartan 30 sailor0613 Meets & Greets 8 10-03-2009 07:33
Tartan 44 palauboy Monohull Sailboats 23 09-06-2008 17:32
Tartan ? GMW General Sailing Forum 6 02-06-2008 11:03

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 14:51.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.