Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 30-05-2013, 18:15   #1
cruiser

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,129
Updating Charts-- The Cathlamet Bay

Okay, so I'm sitting here, happily reading the LNMs and updating my charts.

Here's my question.

In District 13, in LMN 45/12, the Cathlamet Bay South Channel Light #2 was marked "TRLB"-- temporarily replaced with a lighted bouy.

In LMN 16/13, the Cathlamet Bay South Channel Light #2 was destroyed. That is, it was marked "Struct Dest" in the LMN.

In LMN 19/13, it was replaced with a temporary bouy with the same characteristics and number, some distance south.

In LMN 20/13, it was marked extinguished.

So.

Which light was extinguished, the destroyed light or the temporary bouy?

Which light was destroyed in week 16?

It doesn't make any sense to mark a light that has been destroyed as extinguished, but there isn't anything in the LMN that differentiates between the destroyed light and the temporary replacement bouy.

Futhermore, it doesn't make any sense to extinguish the temporary bouy until and unless the original light has been replaced and is functioning, but there isn't anything that says that's so, either.
Jammer Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 21:41   #2
cruiser

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,129
Re: Updating Charts-- The Cathlamet Bay

I must be the only guy who updates charts...
Jammer Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2013, 09:14   #3
Registered User
 
HappySeagull's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: B.C.,Canada
Boat: 29'
Posts: 2,423
Re: Updating Charts-- The Cathlamet Bay

nope, not quite. I load a gpx file into OpenCPN as a layer. It can be updated as an entity. ..but sorry, I can't answer your local question...my limited attention span has it as: the structure was replaced with a buoy that was thereafter "extinguished" but the buoy itself is still there...? perhaps the light interfered with more important ones or was too hard to maintain or...
HappySeagull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2013, 16:06   #4
cruiser

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,129
Re: Updating Charts-- The Cathlamet Bay

I guess I'll have to call the Coast Guard.

I wish there were a simple way to update iNavX. It seems to be the one I look at the most often.

Navionics can be updated, but it's a pain.
Jammer Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 10:42   #5
cruiser

Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 14
Re: Updating Charts-- The Cathlamet Bay

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jammer Six View Post
Okay, so I'm sitting here, happily reading the LNMs and updating my charts.

It doesn't make any sense to mark a light that has been destroyed as extinguished.
if the light is destroyed then it is extinguished, no light, isn't it. regardless is it destroyed or someone switched it off.


what they should do, put wreck mark
gindac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.