Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 21-09-2012, 09:41   #1
Registered User
 
DDabs's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Boat: Morgan Moorings 50
Posts: 1,895
Images: 27
Backstay Questions

Gooood morning everyone,

I am looking at a Beneteau Oceanis 461, and I need your help in schooling me on backstays.

Basically I noticed that the 461 has two backstays that attach to the starboard and port sides of the transom, rather than having a single backstay in the middle of the boat. Is there any difference to this design, and does it have drawbacks?

Also, I notice that many people like to upgrade to a hydraulic backstay. Is this possible when having two? Would I have to upgrade both of them?

The yacht I'm considering is properly outfitted to do some serious cruising, which is why I'm trying to figure out if the backstays are an issue worth addressing, or if I'll be fine. Thanks!

-David
DDabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2012, 09:49   #2
Registered User
 
Khagan1227's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kansas City, MO
Boat: In the hunt again, unknown
Posts: 1,331
Re: Backstay Questions

You don't mention a year, but my guess is that the 461 has a sugar scoop stern and it would interfere with that.
I don't know of any drawbacks, I've had a split stay on my boats in the past and the only problem I had was the bimini top either had to be smaller, or two openings in it for the stay.
You can have two hydraulic adjusters installed.
Khagan1227 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2012, 09:51   #3
Registered User
 
DDabs's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Boat: Morgan Moorings 50
Posts: 1,895
Images: 27
Re: Backstay Questions

It's a 1998 Oceanis 461. This exact one to be exact:

1998 Beneteau 461 Sail Boat For Sale - www.yachtworld.com
DDabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2012, 09:52   #4
Registered User
 
DDabs's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Boat: Morgan Moorings 50
Posts: 1,895
Images: 27
Re: Backstay Questions

Is a hydraulic backstay a good investment? What exactly does it provide, the ability to tighten or loosen it easier?
DDabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2012, 10:05   #5
Registered User
 
Sailmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston
Boat: ‘01 Catana 401
Posts: 9,626
Re: Backstay Questions

The hydraulic backstay, properly executed, allows you to tighten the two backstays evenly. Realistically it's only needed to enhance windward performance. Compared to our boat, this shouldn't be a problem on a stock 461.
Sailmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2012, 10:10   #6
Registered User
 
Khagan1227's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kansas City, MO
Boat: In the hunt again, unknown
Posts: 1,331
Re: Backstay Questions

Nice boat.

I know there are several people on here that will swear by them, and like them.

I have a friend that has them on his 39ft O'Day and I doubt they have ever been used very much. If you know what you are doing, and how to use them, they can help the performance of the boat. If you don't, you can do some serious damage to your rigging.

Below is a link to a video about adjusting the back stay that should help answer your question:

Khagan1227 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2012, 10:24   #7
Registered User
 
DDabs's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Boat: Morgan Moorings 50
Posts: 1,895
Images: 27
Re: Backstay Questions

Khagan thanks for the video. I like the ending: "you'll probably beat the hell out of your neighbor and piss him off, but hey... that's sailing"

Anyways, it seems like a hydraulic backstay may only be a good tool for a fractional rig if you're going to be doing alot of tweaking? The 461 is a masthead rig I believe, correct?
DDabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2012, 10:58   #8
Registered User
 
Khagan1227's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kansas City, MO
Boat: In the hunt again, unknown
Posts: 1,331
Re: Backstay Questions

As a generalization, yes.

The Beneteau 461 you are looking at looks to be a masthead rig.
Khagan1227 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2012, 11:01   #9
Registered User
 
DDabs's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Boat: Morgan Moorings 50
Posts: 1,895
Images: 27
Re: Backstay Questions

Another case closed. Thanks for all the input!
DDabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2012, 12:26   #10
Registered User
 
cwyckham's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Boat: Niagara 35
Posts: 1,878
Re: Backstay Questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by DDabs View Post
Khagan thanks for the video. I like the ending: "you'll probably beat the hell out of your neighbor and piss him off, but hey... that's sailing"

Anyways, it seems like a hydraulic backstay may only be a good tool for a fractional rig if you're going to be doing alot of tweaking? The 461 is a masthead rig I believe, correct?
On a masthead rig, you can use the adjuster to adjust the sag in the headstay when working to windward, which effects the draft of your headsail. Most cruisers don't bother.

If you're looking at a boat with in-mast furling, then you're already making some largish performance compromises. I wouldn't worry about a backstay adjuster. I'd guess a tiny minority of cruisers use them.
cwyckham is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 21:22.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.