Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 31-03-2009, 15:21   #1
Registered User
 
farotherside's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: cruising northern Australia
Boat: Islander 34
Posts: 318
Running Backstays?

...at least I think that's what they're called.

My boat has the usual type of backstay, going from the absolute top of the mast then splitting into two about six feet from the deck, and attaching to two points at the stern.

Then there's these other two stays, that attach about 3/4 of the way up the mast, just shy of the second set of spreaders, that attach to the deck at about 4:00 and 8:00:


(please pardon my dirty, dirty boat - this photo was taken before I took possession and she hadn't been scrubbed in a year or more!)

These stays are clearly adjustable, and the previous owner says that it's so they can be moved around. I'm at a loss though - what benefit is there to moving the stays around?

Quite frankly I find the rigging setup (ie blocks, a 6' line run 8" off the deck, and a cleat) to be inelegant at best, and a hazard to passengers. There's a half-finished project in one of the storage lockers, where a custom stainless lock/release lever system has been built but not installed, and I think eventually I will attempt this - but for now, I don't really understand the value of the backstays not being fixed?

Can someone explain to me why this is useful, bearing in mind that while I'm fond of going fast, I have pretty much zero interest in racing (aside from the post-regatta drinks!). On a liveaboard/cruising/pleasure boat, is it worth keeping these as adjustable at all, or should I just fix them permanently and reclaim the deck space?
farotherside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2009, 15:26   #2
Registered User
 
senormechanico's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2003
Boat: Dragonfly 1000 trimaran
Posts: 7,163
The owner's manual for my Dragonfly 1000 says to ease the cap shrouds when at the dock, and tighten them incrementally for light, mid and heavy air.

The point is to avoid unnecessarily straining the rig, while also avoiding slack leeward shrouds in heavy air.


Steve B.
senormechanico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2009, 16:19   #3
Registered User
 
maxingout's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cruising
Boat: Privilege 39 Catamaran, Exit Only
Posts: 2,723
I installed similar running backstays to back up my cap shrouds when sailing downwind offshore. They were an exercise in redundancy in an offshore saliing catamaran. I don't know if they saved my mast, but I will say that in our circumnavigation, the only original rigging that survived the trip was the cap shrouds that were backed up by the running backstays. All other standing rigging was replaced in various ports around the world.
__________________
Dave -Sailing Vessel Exit Only
https://RealOceanCruiser.com
https://PositiveThinkingSailor.com
maxingout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2009, 17:23   #4
Registered User
 
roger.waite's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Plimmerton, New Zealand
Boat: Samsara, a Ross 930
Posts: 380
As Dave says, they take strain off going downwind. Particularly if you get stopped by a wave, and the apparent wind suddenly goes above what you are reefed for.

Most running backstays connect where the forestay comes into the mast to keep the forestay tight, reducing sag and improving upwind performance of the jib. On monohulls with very light masts, you sometimes see an additional backstay coming from an unstayed section of the mast. I presume these limit pumping and fatigue.
roger.waite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2009, 17:32   #5
Registered User
 
roger.waite's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Plimmerton, New Zealand
Boat: Samsara, a Ross 930
Posts: 380
Forgot to say - for monohulls with a bendy mast - pressure on the backstay, boom vang and Cunningham is also used to flatten the mainsail when going upwind. Can help pointing & depower a little, particularly when slightly over-powered.

Not sure how this works on multihulls where the stay comes in at a wider angle ...
roger.waite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 07:50   #6
Senior Cruiser
 
sandy daugherty's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: May 2008
Location: near Annapolis
Boat: PDQ 36 & Atlantic 42
Posts: 1,178
Traditional running backstays lerad from the masthead to the stern on both sides of the boat. Lower shrouds, meant mostly to keep the mast in column, are fixed. Your rig seems reversed. The idea of an adjustable backstay is to carry the loads of masthead sails AND to bow the mast slightly forward to flatten the main when hard on the wind. I see no advantage of your set up except to ease the load or keep a bendy mast straight. That is, unless they are there to control mast pumping, a sort of hip shimmy that can very quickly fatigue a mast.
sandy daugherty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 08:27   #7
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,933
Images: 4
Pretty tough to answer without more info.

Does the rig have sweep to the spreaders? How much sweep? I would guess these runners are there to support the rig when running deep since it does not have sufficient sweep. These must be full adjustable to allow the main out when deep. Heavy air jibes should be fun.

Does the mast head have a crane? If it does not have a crane there is no bend induced by the runners, the crane is an eccentric that bows the rig. No crane, no bow.

Is there an intermediate on the runners going to a center location on the mast? If there is no intermediate (check stay) then the mast can pump and this runner will not help in that regard.

What is the D1 configuration? D1 afts? D1 centerline? D1 forwards? Is there a babystay or innerforestays? Is it a rotating spar? Does it have diamonds to support the panel? Does it have jumpers?

In my opinion I would not change the rig around until I fully knew how any move would impact rig stability.

Maybe more pics? Like I said, pretty tough to answer inteligently without more info.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew23 View Post
...at least I think that's what they're called.

My boat has the usual type of backstay, going from the absolute top of the mast then splitting into two about six feet from the deck, and attaching to two points at the stern.

Then there's these other two stays, that attach about 3/4 of the way up the mast, just shy of the second set of spreaders, that attach to the deck at about 4:00 and 8:00:


(please pardon my dirty, dirty boat - this photo was taken before I took possession and she hadn't been scrubbed in a year or more!)

These stays are clearly adjustable, and the previous owner says that it's so they can be moved around. I'm at a loss though - what benefit is there to moving the stays around?

Quite frankly I find the rigging setup (ie blocks, a 6' line run 8" off the deck, and a cleat) to be inelegant at best, and a hazard to passengers. There's a half-finished project in one of the storage lockers, where a custom stainless lock/release lever system has been built but not installed, and I think eventually I will attempt this - but for now, I don't really understand the value of the backstays not being fixed?

Can someone explain to me why this is useful, bearing in mind that while I'm fond of going fast, I have pretty much zero interest in racing (aside from the post-regatta drinks!). On a liveaboard/cruising/pleasure boat, is it worth keeping these as adjustable at all, or should I just fix them permanently and reclaim the deck space?
Joli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 08:31   #8
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,933
Images: 4
Doesn't everyone? Our caps in racing trim are 40,000 pounds, in cruising mode we set them to 30,000 pounds. Otherwise the furniture moves.

Quote:
Originally Posted by senormechanico View Post
The owner's manual for my Dragonfly 1000 says to ease the cap shrouds when at the dock, and tighten them incrementally for light, mid and heavy air.

The point is to avoid unnecessarily straining the rig, while also avoiding slack leeward shrouds in heavy air.


Steve B.
Joli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 08:35   #9
CF Adviser
 
Bash's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: sausalito
Boat: 14 meter sloop
Posts: 7,260
as to the question of moving them...

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew23 View Post
These stays are clearly adjustable, and the previous owner says that it's so they can be moved around. I'm at a loss though - what benefit is there to moving the stays around?
...people will often move their runners forward, near the mast, in order to "store" them in light air when they're not needed to keep the mast from pumping.

BTW, your intuition that they might be hazardous to crew and passengers is spot on. Google on the term "Koch block" and you'll discover how a runner block knocked skipper Bill Koch silly during an America's Cup regatta. We used to call them head knockers, but ever since then they've been called Koch Blocks.

Bottom line: runners are evil. Racers like them because it's one more thing to tweak, which means they'll benefit the better crew. The rest of us realize that there are far better ways to prevent a mast from pumping, beginning with swept spreaders.
__________________
cruising is entirely about showing up--in boat shoes.
Bash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 11:44   #10
Senior Cruiser
 
sandy daugherty's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: May 2008
Location: near Annapolis
Boat: PDQ 36 & Atlantic 42
Posts: 1,178
No crane is needed to bow the mast on a fractional rig.
sandy daugherty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 13:44   #11
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,933
Images: 4
True enough, I assumed mast head rig. Guess we'll have to wait and see what more there is to the story.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandy daugherty View Post
No crane is needed to bow the mast on a fractional rig.
Joli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 14:11   #12
Registered User
 
farotherside's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: cruising northern Australia
Boat: Islander 34
Posts: 318
ok, sorry - I'm still a n00b sailor, most of my sailing has been dinghys. I have no idea what you mean by D1, rotating spars or jumpers...

Here's some more pics of the rig - I really don't know that much about it, so whatever you can tell me is helpful, I'm learning!



here's a bigger photo of her stern, with the stays visible - I'll link instead of embed, 'cause it's pretty large: http://mux.ca/boat/tiefighter-stern.jpg
farotherside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 14:25   #13
Moderator
 
Jim Cate's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: cruising SW Pacific
Boat: Jon Sayer 1-off 46 ft fract rig sloop strip plank in W Red Cedar
Posts: 21,205
Drew,
Searunner tris were pretty simple and straightforward designs, and all this talk of bendy rigs and so on is out of place IMO. A look at your pix shows that you have an inner forestay on which you can set a staysail. The main purpose of your runners is to help keep the mast straight when using said stays'l, especially when going to windward. If you don't use the runner, the mast bows forward from the loading of the inner stay, and this lets the luff of the stays'l sag off, and this in turn impairs performance.
So, for most sailing you can unhook the runners and lead them forward, out of the way of the mains'l. Incidentally, in case this hadn't occured to you, when sailing using the runner, only the windward one is set up tight. The leeward one is released and moved forward so that it does not interfere with the mains'l.

On our boat (a fractional rig with runners) we can leave both of them set up when we have 2 or more reefs in the main because then the main clears the stays. This gives extra support to the mast in heavy going, and I bet that your boat is the same.

Hope that this has helped,

Cheers,

Jim
__________________
Jim and Ann s/v Insatiable II, lying Port Cygnet Tasmania once again.
Jim Cate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 14:32   #14
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,933
Images: 4
Ok, so it's a mast head rig with in line double spreaders and an inner forestay for canvas.

The stays (runners) you identify support the inner forestay, Those are there so you don't pull the panel out of column when flying canvas from the inner forestay.
The boat has a permanent backstay without a crane at the masthead so you can't bow the rig with the back stay hard.
The d1s on center are the lower diagonal stays.
You have a permanatly fixed mast, not rotating.
There are no diamonds for panel stiffness or jumpers like you see with a frac.

Should be a good solid rig but you must keep the running backs.

Does that answer the question?



Quote:
Originally Posted by drew23 View Post
ok, sorry - I'm still a n00b sailor, most of my sailing has been dinghys. I have no idea what you mean by D1, rotating spars or jumpers...

Here's some more pics of the rig - I really don't know that much about it, so whatever you can tell me is helpful, I'm learning!



here's a bigger photo of her stern, with the stays visible - I'll link instead of embed, 'cause it's pretty large: http://mux.ca/boat/tiefighter-stern.jpg
Joli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 15:12   #15
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 19,004
Good thread and amazing that it was all the way to the 13th post from Jim Cate for the right answer!!

So, indeed, they are only needed when sailing with the staysail or if you feel the conditions are so bad that you want to support the mast more (but it shouldn't need that help...)

ciao!
Nick.
s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
backstays, running backstays


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Replacement Running Backstays Oceanroaming Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 30 06-08-2009 06:53
After rebuild - running in sildene Engines and Propulsion Systems 20 15-08-2007 23:41
Adjustable Backstays eskfreedom Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 3 01-05-2007 21:40
Should we have running backstays ? ribbony Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 21 19-12-2006 19:39

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 22:58.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.