Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > Monohull Sailboats
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-05-2024, 10:47   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Annapolis
Boat: O’Day 40
Posts: 215
Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

I have a 40’ O’Day and want to know if I can use a low friction ring to carry sheets for an asym spinnaker in lieu of purchasing turning blocks? I appreciate the simplicity of being able to remove a sheet from a turning block but boy are they pricey!
LouK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 11:36   #2
Writing Full-Time Since 2014
 
thinwater's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: PDQ Altair, 32/34
Posts: 9,675
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

LFRs are really either for Dyneema or small deflections (barberhaulers). They aren't used for large angle turning blocks and polyester sheets (too much friction for something that is trimmed frequently).


Garhauer makes reasonably (?) priced snatch blocks.
https://www.garhauermarine.com/shop/...ch-block-60sn/
https://www.garhauermarine.com/shop/...ch-block-70sn/
__________________
Gear Testing--Engineering--Sailing
https://sail-delmarva.blogspot.com/
thinwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 11:45   #3
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Annapolis
Boat: O’Day 40
Posts: 215
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Thanks for the advice, agreed Garhauer makes good stuff & they’re nice to work with.
LouK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 13:09   #4
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: Moody 376
Posts: 504
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Lou,

for what its worth. I have used LFR in place of snatch blocks for my asym on my Moody for the last few seasons with no ill effects. I'm not racing and it trims fine. the sheet angle is less than 90*

my asym has a luff of 55 and a foot of 26

the LFR are tylaska with 1/8" dynema line connecting the LFR to the snap shackle on the toe rail.

the first pic was version one with a loop of 12 strand poly. the second picture is dynema
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	67743605899__5716DBED-DD29-443D-BF31-BE89B5819CB5.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	416.8 KB
ID:	289705   Click image for larger version

Name:	71354836188__EF6EC052-C326-4D32-BD63-ABD01E5F5640.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	428.6 KB
ID:	289706  

marcjsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 14:42   #5
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 19,110
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by marcjsmith View Post
Lou,

for what its worth. I have used LFR in place of snatch blocks for my asym on my Moody for the last few seasons with no ill effects. I'm not racing and it trims fine. the sheet angle is less than 90*

my asym has a luff of 55 and a foot of 26

the LFR are tylaska with 1/8" dynema line connecting the LFR to the snap shackle on the toe rail.

the first pic was version one with a loop of 12 strand poly. the second picture is dynema
Noooooooooooooo………. Nooooooooooooooooo……….. not metal snap shackles to attach low friction rings! Hitch a Dyneema loop, no metal!
__________________
“It’s a trap!” - Admiral Ackbar.

s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 14:48   #6
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: PNW
Boat: 35 Ft. cutter, custom
Posts: 2,407
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
Noooooooooooooo………. Nooooooooooooooooo……….. not metal snap shackles to attach low friction rings! Hitch a Dyneema loop, no metal!
I don't see anything wrong with the pic that was shown, it's a reasonable set-up that can be moved to another spot.
I for one would not be running Dynema thru those oval cutouts on the aluminum toerail.
__________________
Beginning to Prepare to Commence
Bowdrie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 14:54   #7
Registered User
 
Smokeys Kitchen's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Boat is on the hard in San Carlos for the tropical storm season. We are back in the PNW
Boat: 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
Posts: 727
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
Noooooooooooooo………. Nooooooooooooooooo……….. not metal snap shackles to attach low friction rings! Hitch a Dyneema loop, no metal!
Hi Jedi,

You've posted some really great stuff over time. Could you educate me and tell me what is incorrect about hooking the LFR to the toerail via a metal snap shackle connected to the LFR via a dyneema tie?

Thanks,
Ron - S/V Just Lucky
Smokeys Kitchen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 16:41   #8
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: Moody 376
Posts: 504
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
Noooooooooooooo………. Nooooooooooooooooo……….. not metal snap shackles to attach low friction rings! Hitch a Dyneema loop, no metal!
I agree no metal to the lfr. But if you look at the pic. It’s snap shackle to dynema to lfr.

So no point loads on the lfr
marcjsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 16:54   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Lifeaboard
Boat: FP Lavezzi 40
Posts: 3,149
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinwater View Post
LFRs are really either for Dyneema or small deflections (barberhaulers). They aren't used for large angle turning blocks and polyester sheets (too much friction for something that is trimmed frequently).


Garhauer makes reasonably (?) priced snatch blocks.
https://www.garhauermarine.com/shop/...ch-block-60sn/
https://www.garhauermarine.com/shop/...ch-block-70sn/
Wow they are expensive, anthal makes some for half the price. Paid euro for 12mm block.
But yes I would use LFR too. Just replace blocks by LFR for the reefing lines on the main sail and they work well too. No dyneema lines.
CaptainRivet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 16:59   #10
Registered User

Join Date: May 2020
Location: SoCal
Boat: 35' Alden Design Cutter
Posts: 454
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by marcjsmith View Post
I agree no metal to the lfr. But if you look at the pic. It’s snap shackle to dynema to lfr.

So no point loads on the lfr
I think Jedi is saying that if you have a LFR on one end of your Dyneema and a loop on the other, you could simply thread the LFR though the toerail and loop and be done. No need for a $40 paint scratcher to be attached
Iron E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 18:33   #11
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,363
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokeys Kitchen View Post
Could you educate me and tell me what is incorrect about hooking the LFR to the toerail via a metal snap shackle connected to the LFR via a dyneema tie?
The metal shackle will wear/deform the aluminum toerail, will put a groove in it (and take off the anodizing) . A Dyneema loop or cow hitch or soft shackle will be much kinder to the aluminum toerail, will not damage it like the metal shackle.
Breaking Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 19:06   #12
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: Moody 376
Posts: 504
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Breaking Waves View Post
The metal shackle will wear/deform the aluminum toerail, will put a groove in it (and take off the anodizing) . A Dyneema loop or cow hitch or soft shackle will be much kinder to the aluminum toerail, will not damage it like the metal shackle.
I would think the toe rail would not be kind to the dynema
marcjsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 19:53   #13
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Little Compton, RI
Boat: Cape George 31
Posts: 3,045
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

^^A slit piece of water hose put on the toerail hole will protect a dyneema loop from cutting. The girth-hitched loop keeps the piece of hose on. I've seen it done, and it looks ok.
__________________
Ben
zartmancruising.com
Benz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2024, 23:44   #14
always in motion is the future
 
s/v Jedi's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in paradise
Boat: Sundeer 64
Posts: 19,110
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Here’s the whole idea about using soft attachments, of which low frictions rings are part: they are -soft-.

This means no metal.

Normally they point you to soft shackles to replace metal shackles, but for a low friction ring in this setup, the best option is a Dyneema loop spliced onto the ring. You then cow hitch it to the toe rail.

See attached picture.

The Dyneema loop will be just fine on the toe rail. If you have damaged the toe rail with hard attachments then take a small metal file or a Dremel and remove the burrs. Dyneema is a very tough material and if you would load test it, I wouldn’t be surprised if the toe rail gets cut by the Dyneema instead of the other way around.

It’s simple: chafe will be obvious, just look at it. There will not be any hidden damage to the Dyneema, it will be right there in plain sight. But I know it will be fine.

Yes you can add a Dyneema chafe sleeve around it but I don’t see the benefit. If the Dyneema wears out in so many years then simply splice a new piece on. The chafe sleeve is just as expensive and will wear out quicker.

Get rid of the metal!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5509.jpeg
Views:	7
Size:	40.8 KB
ID:	289717  
__________________
“It’s a trap!” - Admiral Ackbar.

s/v Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2024, 01:24   #15
Moderator
 
Dockhead's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denmark (Winter), Cruising North Sea and Baltic (Summer)
Boat: Cutter-Rigged Moody 54
Posts: 34,037
Re: Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
Noooooooooooooo………. Nooooooooooooooooo……….. not metal snap shackles to attach low friction rings! Hitch a Dyneema loop, no metal!

Indeed!
__________________
"You sea! I resign myself to you also . . . . I guess what you mean,
I behold from the beach your crooked inviting fingers,
I believe you refuse to go back without feeling of me;
We must have a turn together . . . . I undress . . . . hurry me out of sight of the land,
Cushion me soft . . . . rock me in billowy drowse,
Dash me with amorous wet . . . . I can repay you."
Walt Whitman
Dockhead is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low friction Rings in lieu of turning blocks? LouK Monohull Sailboats 0 10-05-2024 10:46
Unveiling Bullseye Strops for low friction rings Seaworthy Lass Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 313 20-09-2023 20:09
Replacing Blocks with Low Friction Rings janders Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 12 12-06-2017 09:26
Using low friction rings. model 10 Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 14 18-08-2016 06:26
Soft shackles on low friction rings Seaworthy Lass Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 3 18-07-2016 05:19

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 14:24.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.