Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 25-04-2014, 09:49   #1
Registered User

Join Date: May 2013
Location: Treasure Island, FL
Boat: Island Packet 35
Posts: 478
Rocna Versus the World

We are equipping our boat for an extended 1-2 year cruise and currently have a Bruce and Plow on the bow and Danforth on the Stern. ICW/Carib

We keep hearing good (GREAT) things about the Rocna. Is it worth ditching the Bruce and Plow and replacing them with a Rocna?

I would have to ditch both the Bruce and plow as I would have to modify the sprit to accept the odd shape of the Rocna, and probably loose the ability to store two anchors on the bow.
tdoster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 09:55   #2
Registered User
 
Stu Jackson's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cowichan Bay, BC (Maple Bay Marina)
Posts: 9,706
Re: Ronca versus the world

It IS a "better" anchor. I've had a bruce and the Rocna pulls me off the bow when setting. But so do most of the new gen anchors.

Anchor war again? Hardly.

There are other new gen anchors out there, look around for better pricing than Rocna.

Why NEW GEN Anchors are Better:

Anchors & TEST Results of New Generation Anchors EXCELLENT & Important
__________________
Stu Jackson
Catalina 34 #224 (1986) C34IA Secretary
Cowichan Bay, BC, SR/FK, M25, Rocna 10 (22#) (NZ model)
Stu Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 09:55   #3
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,986
Re: Ronca versus the world

I used a Bruce for many years, never drug, lucky I guess. I always carried a Bruce a few sizes up from the recommended size. I have a Rocna now because it came on the boat. If it came with an oversized Bruce I would not have changed it.
robert sailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 09:56   #4
Registered User
 
denverd0n's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,015
Images: 6
Re: Ronca versus the world

Well, first off, it's Rocna, not Ronca--the 'n' comes after the 'c'. Second, if I were you, I would keep the Bruce and the plow (assuming they are adequately sized for your boat). I would use them, get some experience with them, and then after that decide if it is worth it to ditch them for a newer design. The Bruce type anchor in particular has a lot of fans and, while it may not get quite the raves that the Rocna types do, it is generally considered a very adequate anchor. You may find that the anchors you have are plenty for what you need.

Good luck.
denverd0n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 09:58   #5
Registered User
 
Stu Jackson's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cowichan Bay, BC (Maple Bay Marina)
Posts: 9,706
Re: Ronca versus the world

Yes, you're right. The OP didn't mention size.
__________________
Stu Jackson
Catalina 34 #224 (1986) C34IA Secretary
Cowichan Bay, BC, SR/FK, M25, Rocna 10 (22#) (NZ model)
Stu Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 10:08   #6
Registered User
 
cwyckham's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Boat: Niagara 35
Posts: 1,878
Re: Ronca versus the world

I would highly recommend a new generation anchor, but not necessarily a Rocna. There are three or four non-hoop new-gen anchors that won't cause issues with your sprit. The only one that is economically available in the states is the Manson Boss.

That's what we went for and why. So far, we are very, very happy with it.
cwyckham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 10:11   #7
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Marquesas Islands
Boat: Nauticat 43
Posts: 402
Re: Ronca versus the world

Have you considered the Quickline Ultra anchor? It gives next gen performance but has a shape that should be compatible with direct re-use.
Ded reckoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 10:12   #8
Registered User

Join Date: May 2013
Location: Treasure Island, FL
Boat: Island Packet 35
Posts: 478
Re: Ronca versus the world

Quote:
Originally Posted by denverd0n View Post
Well, first off, it's Rocna, not Ronca--the 'n' comes after the 'c'. Second, if I were you, I would keep the Bruce and the plow (assuming they are adequately sized for your boat). I would use them, get some experience with them, and then after that decide if it is worth it to ditch them for a newer design. The Bruce type anchor in particular has a lot of fans and, while it may not get quite the raves that the Rocna types do, it is generally considered a very adequate anchor. You may find that the anchors you have are plenty for what you need.

Good luck.
Good Gosh. I was even on their website looking at it when I misspelled it.

As far as experience with the 3 others on board, I have had 35 years experience and the last time I bought the latest greatest was when the Fortress came out and it has followed me on 4 boats as a backup.

All of my anchors are oversized and have been adequate over the years. For this trip, we have far more invested than my younger days, and even though I have trust in the current setup, from some recent conversations, the Rocna (got it right this time) is supposed to give a lot more peaceful sleeps and shore excursions that the boat will be where we set it.

From a design standpoint, it clearly makes a lot of sense to me in regards to the ability to reset itself and less prone to dragging sideways across the bottom?
tdoster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 10:15   #9
Registered User
 
Mike OReilly's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Good question
Boat: Rafiki 37
Posts: 14,218
Re: Ronca versus the world

We anchored for years using CQRs (genuine and copies), various danforths and a Bruce. I moved to a Rocna a couple years ago and would never go back. I'm a frugal sailor (OK, I'm poor), but my anchoring system is one place I would not compromise. If you're leaving on an extended cruise it only makes sense to have the best system you can afford.

The new generation anchors (Rocna, Manson, Spade, etc) are, in my experience, just better overall. There are some specific cases where a danforth style is superior. And possibly there may be some cases where a Bruce might do better, but overall my experience is that the new style anchors are a big improvement.

BTW, if the Rocna doesn't fit your rollers, the perhaps one of the others might. Look at them all.
__________________
Why go fast, when you can go slow.
BLOG: www.helplink.com/CLAFC
Mike OReilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 10:19   #10
Registered User

Join Date: May 2013
Location: Treasure Island, FL
Boat: Island Packet 35
Posts: 478
Re: Ronca versus the world

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike OReilly View Post
We anchored for years using CQRs (genuine and copies), various danforths and a Bruce. I moved to a Rocna a couple years ago and would never go back. I'm a frugal sailor (OK, I'm poor), but my anchoring system is one place I would not compromise. If you're leaving on an extended cruise it only makes sense to have the best system you can afford.

The new generation anchors (Rocna, Manson, Spade, etc) are, in my experience, just better overall. There are some specific cases where a danforth style is superior. And possibly there may be some cases where a Bruce might do better, but overall my experience is that the new style anchors are a big improvement.

BTW, if the Rocna doesn't fit your rollers, the perhaps one of the others might. Look at them all.
THANK YOU. What I keep hearing is that the people who are using them are very happy with them. I am not up for testing the latest greatest, but having something new but tried and true fits the bill for us. Appreciate your reply, that was exactly what we were looking for.
tdoster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 10:21   #11
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Oregon
Boat: Seafarer36c
Posts: 5,563
Re: Ronca versus the world

We sailed a bit with an old design plow and never did really drag anywhere. But we needed to keep up with the Jones's so bought a 25kg Rocna. I had to build a new bowsprit to fit the new anchor. In the first big blow we went through the Rocna drug like crazy. I'm pretty sure it was my fault but still it makes me wonder.
model 10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 10:57   #12
Registered User
 
Cheechako's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Skagit City, WA
Posts: 25,526
Re: Ronca versus the world

RONCA.... didnt they invent the Veg-O-matic? :>)
__________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Broads and Boats. The rest I wasted" - Elmore Leonard











Cheechako is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 11:01   #13
TDC
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 29
Re: Ronca versus the world

I do believe a new gen/scoop is better than the CQR/Plow...

But it's not some super black magic. I have dragged the Rocna multiple times. First was in weeds. Grass got wrapped around the roll bar and was a pain in the rear to clear the fouling. Second time was in 'great holding' heavy mud. The mud filled up the scoop and then seemed to just drag along like a mushroom.

Overall I still recommend it. But am considering taking the Bruce out of the bilge to have a backup on the second roller. Bruce may not hold as well as a plow (or Rocna) but it has always set fast.
TDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 11:03   #14
Registered User
 
Stu Jackson's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cowichan Bay, BC (Maple Bay Marina)
Posts: 9,706
Re: Ronca versus the world

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdoster View Post
THANK YOU.... Appreciate your reply, that was exactly what we were looking for.
Perhaps you did not have time to read the link I provided earlier. Pretty much the same input. Mike is right, they are a great improvement.
__________________
Stu Jackson
Catalina 34 #224 (1986) C34IA Secretary
Cowichan Bay, BC, SR/FK, M25, Rocna 10 (22#) (NZ model)
Stu Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2014, 11:09   #15
Registered User

Join Date: May 2013
Location: Treasure Island, FL
Boat: Island Packet 35
Posts: 478
Re: Ronca versus the world

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheechako View Post
RONCA.... didnt they invent the Veg-O-matic? :>)
That must be the Freudian Slip I made. I even made the joke at dinner that 'ROCK-NA' sounded like a Neanderthal Product. But everyone around the table talked like it sliced and diced.

Hmmm, wait. Was the VegOMatic a product of a comedian named Gallagher?
tdoster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
rocna


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boston Whaler versus Albury versus ??? Magor Powered Boats 3 26-02-2014 11:43
World Ocean Database and World Ocean Atlas Series GordMay The Library 2 15-01-2007 20:14
Sharing Cost versus Charter Sunspot Baby General Sailing Forum 10 15-11-2005 02:38
C&C versus Catalina Ardent Monohull Sailboats 11 10-04-2005 14:07
Wood versus FRP GrayGoose Monohull Sailboats 3 16-02-2005 18:38

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:34.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.