r134a will be phased out after 2020 so what is left is propane-butane mixture.
About twice as much as in a lighter.
THE NEW WAVE OF ENERGY EFFICIENT REFRIGERATORS
Two Solutions
The solution that has gained currency in the United States is to use HFCs -- ozone-safe hydrofluorocarbons -- as the refrigerant, and HCFCs -- hydrochlorofluorocarbons, which have reduced ozone-destroying
power -- in the foam
insulation. The solution is a victory for DuPont and other manufacturing giants, which produce these chemicals.
HCFCs are just a temporary solution, because they are
slated to be phased out, by 2020 in the North and 2040 in the South. According to the Worldwatch Institute, DuPont bet heavily on HFCs and HCFCs, investing more than half a billion dollars in their development.
Critics charge that these are imperfect solutions at best. For one thing, HFCs are potent greenhouse gases, with the potential to affect world climate even if they are ozone-friendly. They're also incompatible with some common materials and lubricants. Supporters of HFCs, such as NRDC's David Goldstein, point out that the amount of HFCs in each fridge is relatively small, so that the entire effect of a refrigerator's HFCs on the climate is only 1% as great as the influence of its energy
consumption. If a non-greenhouse
substitute for HFCs increased a fridge's energy use by more than 1%, he says, it would be a net loss for the climate.
The Edge of the Envelope
The 2001 standards will nearly close the gap between mass-market refrigerators and hand-made fridges which were developed for the off-the-grid market. When native New Yorker Larry Schlussler, holding a freshly minted PhD in engineering, developed his ultra-efficient
refrigerator in 1979, its
consumption -- just 300 kilowatt-hours for a 16-cubic-foot model -- seemed like science fiction. Mass-produced fridges at the time used nearly four times as much power. The savings for
remote users were immediate, because they could get by with fewer
solar panels and
batteries.
Sunfrost models are still made to order in a converted dairy in the northern
California town of Arcata. Two- to four-inch-thick
insulation, better door
seals and
latches, no fan, and a top-mounted
compressor and condenser account for the extra-low energy use. Schlussler and his 14 employees turn out about 600 fridges a year, priced between $1200 and $2800 apiece, depending on their size. The low end of the
price range applies to tiny models -- 1 or 4 cubic feet -- including a vaccine
storage unit exported to the developing world. Regular kitchen-sized models are $2400 and up.
Other highly efficient fridges are available from in Michigan (4 to 8 cubic-foot models, marketed to Midwestern homesteaders and the Amish), and the Danish made Vestfrost, a 250-kilowatt-hour, 12-cubic-foot model, available through a
California distributor.
The other solution -- being pushed heavily by Greenpeace under the Greenfreeze label -- is to switch to a greenhouse-neutral hydrocarbon (HC) like
propane, isobutane, or a mixture of the two. These chemicals have the added advantage of being in the public domain and one-twentieth the
price of HFCs. The drawback is that they are flammable. The issue isn't really
safety, because of the small amount of butane in a fridge -- roughly twice what's found in a cigarette lighter. Much greater fire hazards can be found in most kitchens in the form of a gas
stove. No, the problem is liability -- if the gas
stove starts a fire in the kitchen, the fridge manufacturer doesn't
wind up in court. In
Germany, where product liability law is not so exacting, hydrocarbon refrigerants have taken over the market.