|
Click Here to Login |
Community Links |
Social Groups |
Pictures & Albums |
Members List |
Meet the Mods |
Meet the Advisors |
Signup for The Daily Cruiser Email |
Search Forums | |||||
Tag Search | |||||
Advanced Search |
Showing results 1 to 4 of 4
Search took 0.00 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: continuouswave |
Forum: Marine Electronics 17-02-2016, 06:01 |
Replies: 43
Views: 14,959
Posted By
continuouswave
Re: AIS Fault Message
OK--now we have changed the cable specification for the newly installed cable for the third time. We began with RG-233, a cable with very much less loss than RG-58. Next we changed it to RG-213,... |
Forum: Marine Electronics 16-02-2016, 10:01 |
Replies: 43
Views: 14,959
Posted By
continuouswave
Re: AIS Fault Message
There is a big difference between RG-233/U (as you first wrote) and RG-213/U. Which did you actually use? If RG-213/U, then transmission line loss was reduced compared to RG-58/U, but not... |
Forum: Marine Electronics 16-02-2016, 07:27 |
Replies: 43
Views: 14,959
Posted By
continuouswave
Re: AIS Fault Message
My first move would be to actually measure the VSWR on the transmission line at the AIS frequencies 161.975-MHz 162.025-MHz This is somewhat difficult to accomplish because your typical VHF... |
Forum: Marine Electronics 16-02-2016, 00:58 |
Replies: 43
Views: 14,959
Posted By
continuouswave
Re: AIS Fault Message
If the antenna is located atop a mast, I assume the transmission line length is rather long. If the previous transmission line was RG-58/U cable, it was quite lossy. There was probably a loss of more... |
Showing results 1 to 4 of 4 |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc. |
Privacy Guaranteed - your email is never shared with anyone, opt out any time.