Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-02-2014, 23:46   #16
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: On board in Leros, Greece
Boat: Hunter Legend 420 Passage
Posts: 863
Re: battery discharge monitor question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockhead View Post
....I would think that a perfect battery monitor could be made by combining the Smartgauge approach with data about loads from a shunt....
I've had long discussions with the SmartGauge Owners about this - it would also give us an amps IN/OUT reading as well.

But they were very clear that they would never add a shunt to the SmartGauge for two reasons.

Reason number one:- it is not needed to improve the accuracy. Recently feedback from Enersys, who make Optima batteries, claimed it was much better than a shunt based Battery Monitor. They quoted an inaccuracy of 0.1% which seems unbelievable. If it was 50 times that value @ 5% I would be happy.

Reason number two:- the accuracy would probably be reduced in many cases because many installations are wrong, and the programming is wrong or just left at the default values.

Maine Sail has said that "perhaps 7 out of 10 I see installed by pro's and DIY's are wired incorrectly (shunt wiring) and 9.5 out of 10 are programmed incorrectly."
sailinglegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 00:25   #17
Moderator
 
Dockhead's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denmark (Winter), Helsinki (Summer); Cruising the Baltic Sea this year!
Boat: Cutter-Rigged Moody 54
Posts: 33,873
Re: battery discharge monitor question

Quote:
Originally Posted by sailinglegend View Post
I've had long discussions with the SmartGauge Owners about this - it would also give us an amps IN/OUT reading as well.

But they were very clear that they would never add a shunt to the SmartGauge for two reasons.

Reason number one:- it is not needed to improve the accuracy. Recently feedback from Enersys, who make Optima batteries, claimed it was much better than a shunt based Battery Monitor. They quoted an inaccuracy of 0.1% which seems unbelievable. If it was 50 times that value @ 5% I would be happy.

Reason number two:- the accuracy would probably be reduced in many cases because many installations are wrong, and the programming is wrong or just left at the default values.

Maine Sail has said that "perhaps 7 out of 10 I see installed by pro's and DIY's are wired incorrectly (shunt wiring) and 9.5 out of 10 are programmed incorrectly."
Wow, that's pretty hard to believe -- I don't think 0.1% is measureable even with very accurate SG, so how do they know?

But claims of great accuracy (and I agree with you -- +/- 5% would be "great accuracy", as far as I'm concerned) do correspond to lots of other data. As far as I know, the UK Ministry of Defense chose the Smartgauge for all their mobile battery bank monitoring -- another pretty strong endorsement.

I think there's nothing for it for me but to order one. They're only 150 quid over here at full list price.
Dockhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
battery, monitor


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 17:32.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.