Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-04-2007, 17:02   #16
Moderator Emeritus
 
Paul Elliott's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,663
Images: 4
The line isolator you describe is a common-mode choke, and will reduce stray shield currents in the coax to the tuner, without affecting the RF signal carried by the coax. It is also called a "balun" (short for "balanced-to-unbalanced").

I like the idea of the isolator, and it should help reduce any RF ground-loops. But, I still think you need a good ground on the radio. because otherwise you are (by using the isolator) floating the chassis. The 12V power leads may provide an adequate ground, but then again, they may not. If the chassis is floating then you are much more likely to see interactions and interference from the other cables that connect to the radio.

I am still puzzled as to how a line isolator such as yours could cause the problem you have by being defective. It works fine on the lower frequencies, so there aren't any shorts or opens. The only other thing that could be wrong is either an overly-lossy ferrite, or one that isn't permeable enough (a cracked core could do this). But this shouldn't affect the RF signal, only whatever common-mode signal there is. And it certainly shouldn't make a difference if you are just keying the mic but not transmitting a signal.

If it were my system, I would keep the isolator and ground the radio (as an experiment, anyway).

It could still be a broken radio, of course.

For what it's worth, I am an ex-engineer, have an advanced ham license (wb6cxc), and used to design VHF transceivers. My last job was designing 10 and 40 Gbit/s electrical/optical systems. This doesn't mean I'm correct, but at least I can talk the talk.
__________________
Paul Elliott, S/V VALIS - Pacific Seacraft 44 #16 - Friday Harbor, WA
www.sailvalis.com
Paul Elliott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2007, 17:29   #17
Eternal Member

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,046
Images: 4
And good talk it is, Paul. Thanks for those explanations.

I, too, am puzzled by how the isolator/balun could cause the symptoms first noted.

My bet is that the problem is the radio. Now, if Larry were around these parts I'd just substitute a radio or two. Currently have over 20 of them in the shack....running out of room to move :-))

73,

Bill
btrayfors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2007, 19:49   #18
Registered User
 
Radio University's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 47
Send a message via AIM to Radio University
What is the model of the isolator? Is it the T4-500?
Radio University is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2007, 20:30   #19
Moderator Emeritus
 
Paul Elliott's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,663
Images: 4
Antares,

Just to be complete, is your ammeter an analog one (moving needle) or a digital one? An analog meter will not respond to stray RF, so it should be displaying accurately. A digital one *may* be sensitive to the transmitted RF, and may give bogus readings. Bypass capacitors and/or ferrite chokes will usually help.

Given the circumstances, I kind of doubt that the meter is the problem, but you never know... Have you tried to make a radio contact with the radio acting up? A signal report may give you a clue. If there is bad RF feedback occuring, it will likely cause the transmitted signal to sound bad.

On the other hand, I'm running out of hands! Too many possibilities. Try to narrow it down (as was suggested), or take the radio and tuner in to a shop and have them bench-tested.
__________________
Paul Elliott, S/V VALIS - Pacific Seacraft 44 #16 - Friday Harbor, WA
www.sailvalis.com
Paul Elliott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 08:23   #20
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 46
Hey, this is certainly illuminating. The isolator is a T-4. I took it out last night and things got better, but I'm not convinced everything is right. The isolator checked ok for continuity. I'm thinking it did it's job and removed a path the real problem was using in a way that minimized symptoms. I was able to get a SWR meter but did not have time to install it. That's probably a weekend project. Given the nature of what is happening it makes sense to start with Bill's list and work through the entire system.

Back to Paul's question, the meter is digital. It is not working in a "strange" way and I even see the volts drop when the current peaks. That tells me I need to check out every connection for resistance as the wire sizes should be adequate. I'll report back when I make some progress.
Antares is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 08:33   #21
֍֎֍֎֍֎֍֎֍֎

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,136
BT-
Thanks for the correction. As Bogart said in Casablanca, obviously I've been misinformed.
hellosailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 10:01   #22
Eternal Member

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,046
Images: 4
My favorite all-time all-time film!

No problem; hey, we all miss a beat once in awhile. I'm finding that "senior moments" come along more frequently than they used to :-)

Bill
btrayfors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:34   #23
֍֎֍֎֍֎֍֎֍֎

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,136
BT-
Get ten "senior moments" punched on your AARP card, and you get the 11th one for free?<G>
hellosailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-04-2007, 23:19   #24
Moderator Emeritus
 
Paul Elliott's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,663
Images: 4
Antares,

Did you ever figure out what was going on with the radio?
__________________
Paul Elliott, S/V VALIS - Pacific Seacraft 44 #16 - Friday Harbor, WA
www.sailvalis.com
Paul Elliott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-04-2007, 15:33   #25
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 46
I haven't had any quality time to work the issues the last couple of weeks. I have gathered a SWR meter and dummy load so at first opportunity, I will get "scientific" and see what shows. The little I have been able to play with it still shows eradic behavior. I'll report in as soon as I have the next step accomplished.
Antares is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reverse Polarity (AC) GordMay Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 13 30-06-2013 12:12
SSB Antenna - What we ended up with.... swagman Marine Electronics 4 09-02-2007 04:12
SSB installation help NoTies Marine Electronics 28 08-01-2007 12:59
Expensive SSB Comm...? Any better...? CSY Man General Sailing Forum 8 26-12-2006 19:31
Ship's Common Ground zippy Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 4 31-05-2006 09:12

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:52.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.