|
Click Here to Login |
Community Links |
Social Groups |
Pictures & Albums |
Members List |
Meet the Mods |
Meet the Advisors |
Signup for The Daily Cruiser Email |
Search Forums | |||||
Tag Search | |||||
Advanced Search |
Showing results 1 to 10 of 10
Search took 0.00 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: StuM |
Forum: Navigation 06-01-2017, 14:57 |
Replies: 41
Views: 5,044
Posted By
StuM
Re: Celestial Nav?
Just to add, Mike - I hope you have also learnt a little about spurious precision, error ranges and how much to trust quoted numbers. It's useful knowledge which helps in interpreting the... |
Forum: Navigation 06-01-2017, 00:07 |
Replies: 41
Views: 5,044
Posted By
StuM
Re: Celestial Nav?
Don't know where your figure of 8 billion comes from. We all agree that it is about 15 billion miles. Any more precision than that is fairly meaningless since no one knows exactly how far away... |
Forum: Navigation 03-01-2017, 16:50 |
Replies: 41
Views: 5,044
Posted By
StuM
Re: Celestial Nav?
And 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862 is an even better approximation :) But neither of them can improve the accuracy beyond the precision of the... |
Forum: Navigation 03-01-2017, 14:57 |
Replies: 41
Views: 5,044
Posted By
StuM
Re: Celestial Nav?
What you've done wrong is assumed that precision and accuracy are the same thing. You have the number of miles in a light year to 14 digits, but then use " x 8.611" ( 4 digits) as an... |
Forum: Navigation 02-01-2017, 17:07 |
Replies: 41
Views: 5,044
Posted By
StuM
|
Forum: Navigation 02-01-2017, 16:23 |
Replies: 41
Views: 5,044
Posted By
StuM
Re: Celestial Nav?
Possibly an approximation of pi used in converting degrees to radians (which would also explain the factor of 2) ? Which sort of makes the precision of his 5878625373183.6 miles/light year a bit... |
Forum: Navigation 02-01-2017, 14:48 |
Replies: 41
Views: 5,044
Posted By
StuM
Re: Celestial Nav?
Kelkara is correct, :thumb: I used diameter instead of radius of Earth's orbit above :redface:. I've corrected my figures. |
Forum: Navigation 02-01-2017, 14:30 |
Replies: 41
Views: 5,044
Posted By
StuM
|
Forum: Navigation 02-01-2017, 14:27 |
Replies: 41
Views: 5,044
Posted By
StuM
Re: Celestial Nav?
OK, Sirius is 8.6 light years away which is 2.64 parsecs. (see earlier post about parsecs) So you would need to go 2.64 x mean earth orbit to subtend 1 second. So you would need to go 2.64 x... |
Forum: Navigation 02-01-2017, 00:08 |
Replies: 41
Views: 5,044
Posted By
StuM
Re: Celestial Nav?
Just to put it into perspective, a Parsec (parallax second) is the distance subtended by one SECOND of arc across the Earth's mean ORBIT. That is 3.26 light years, or considerably less than the... |
Showing results 1 to 10 of 10 |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc. |
Privacy Guaranteed - your email is never shared with anyone, opt out any time.