The Coast Guard report is a little disappointing compared to some NTSB reports on analogous situations. I remember reading a report on an allision where the NTSB went into detail concerning surly pilot's interaction with a Chinese master. The Chinese culture gives great deference to rank and authority, making it more difficult for a master to intercede when the pilot errs. While the CG report
references that vaguely, it doesn't go into the fact that the shared responsibility requires the pilot to communicate with the bridge crew so they all are agreed on what is happening. In this case the pilot relied entirely on his PPU and shunned any use of the ship's
navigation system -- or even looking out the window. While that in itself was unwise, it also had the effect of shutting off the 3d Officer and crew -- only the pilot had the "valid" information, and the others could not see what he saw. While the 3d Officer did try to politely intercede by repeating the heading when they were passing the turn, he was overly deferential. Had the pilot discussed the turning point with reference to a shared navigational tool, perhaps the timid 3d Officer may have spoken up a little more forcefully. Even in our little
boat, the Admiral is properly insistent that we discuss course changes, particularly in handling tacks and gybes in shallow
water.