Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Welcome Aboard > Meets & Greets
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 20-12-2015, 07:23   #16
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2008
Boat: 2017 Leopard 40
Posts: 2,663
Images: 1
Re: Mono Hull Verses Trimaran Pro's And Con's

Here's an example video that shows the "averaging" effect I referred to in post#15 above. You can see how the wind pressure from the sails working against the lee hull tends to soften the bashing of the center hull. Yes there is bashing, but I also think there would be a lot more motion (a higher degree of rolling and pitching) in a monohull in those conditions, along with bashing.
https://youtu.be/jhu4EOt0n0k
SailFastTri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-12-2015, 07:26   #17
Registered User
 
Training Wheels's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Left coast.
Posts: 1,451
Re: Mono Hull Verses Trimaran Pro's And Con's

^ +1 We've never pounded going upwind. With a main hull less than 4' wide at the waterline, there's really nothing there to pound. Going upwind, if it's rough, we reef way down so we're not flying off the waves. As long as we keep the speed down to 8 or 9 knots, it's a flat, relatively comfortable ride. At least as comfortable as you can be going upwind in nasty stuff.

You don't buy a tri for its accommodations, you buy a tri for its passion for sailing. If you don't have that passion, I'd say the compromises aren't worth it. Also, in our experience, things can happen very quickly on a tri. You have to be on top of your game, or things can go to s%*# fast. Wouldn't recommend one for a novice.


Sent from my iPad using Cruisers Sailing Forum
Training Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-12-2015, 12:52   #18
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, currently
Posts: 38
Re: Mono Hull Verses Trimaran Pro's And Con's

Quote:
Originally Posted by FSMike View Post
Monohulls? Haven't you heard those things can sink lol?
I thought that only happened when they hit submerged multihulls.

All joking aside, how would you describe the motion of the cat under sail compared to the tri that you had sailed? Were there any similarities?
MermaidMuse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-12-2015, 13:35   #19
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, currently
Posts: 38
Re: Mono Hull Verses Trimaran Pro's And Con's

Quote:
Originally Posted by SailFastTri View Post
I don't know why the skipper would have said that. There have been many times that I've hove to in my trimarans, and everything settled down just as it would in a mono. Perhaps the skipper didn't know, or there was something unique in that particular boat's handling that's not universal about trimarans?
Thank you for telling me that.
The particular skipper I was sailing with at the time had sailed his previous two trimarans to Hawaii and back singlehanded. Steering down the wave rather than heaving to seemed to be the prevailing thought consensus among other multihullers of our acquaintance at the time (~20 years ago).

Quote:
Originally Posted by SailFastTri View Post
Having said all that, the (smaller) movement is quicker than a heavy displacement mono, and it's not for everyone. There are times (particularly beating into strong winds) that we slow the boat for comfort and to reduce bashing into head seas.
Helpful observation SailFast! The quickness of movements is probably what my equilibrium did not like. In protected bays our tri could often be lot of fun for me. Out on the ocean, not. Our friends and guests enjoyed the sailing except when we were slamming from wave to wave. Perhaps that which gives me trouble with the motion of the tri is what protects me on the monohulls?

It is not my intent to start a mono versus multi hull debate.
Different folks need different boats. I've met many who love their trimarans and wouldn't sail anything else.

I mention my experience only to encourage the OP to try sailing different designs if he has not already done so. Until that time I had always managed to stay able bodied when my friends had their heads in the bucket. It was a shock and big disappointment to discover how the motion of the tri affected me. It was a beautiful boat and others have really enjoyed sailing her. Just not for me.

Glad to hear that you are happy with your Dragonfly.
MermaidMuse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-12-2015, 18:24   #20
Registered User
 
FSMike's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bahamas/Florida
Boat: Solaris Sunstar 36' catamaran
Posts: 2,686
Images: 5
Re: Mono Hull Verses Trimaran Pro's And Con's

Quote:
Originally Posted by MermaidMuse View Post
I thought that only happened when they hit submerged multihulls.

All joking aside, how would you describe the motion of the cat under sail compared to the tri that you had sailed? Were there any similarities?
There was a popular cartoon in one of trimaran designer Jim Brown's books that showed a couple of people on the hulls of an upside down trimaran looking down into the water to see a sunken monohull that had snagged their mast.

As far as sailing motion, I find a tri is more similar to a mono than a cat is. The biggest similarity I think is that both cats and tris move around more quickly than monos. I have not experienced some of the adverse behaviors described, but methods of sailing multis have evolved.

The only time I've been nervous in either of the two boats mentioned was with some beam seas in a squall while coming across the Gulf of Mexico in the 36' cat, but the cat wasn't bothered and neither was I after a few minutes. Sort of like a mono going rail down and back up only quicker. Never even reefed. Similar conditions but a little more wind going down the west coast of Florida, put in the first reef and boat kept trucking steady as a train.
I've beat to weather and reached in bouncy conditions in the tri but it was never a worrisome experience, sometimes reefed, sometimes not.

Interestingly, I've never been bothered in either type of boat running downwind. My ex and I sailed a 45' Chris White cat for years in varying conditions. Left out of Westend, Grand Bahama Island one morning at about 0700 and cleared the St. Augustine, Fl. sea buoy at 1200 the next day. Wind was from the south, we were flying spinnaker and main surfing up to 19 knots. The seas were 5-6' and increasing near dark, autopilot was starting to have some problems so we went down to just the jib at dusk and proceeded through the night @ 7-8 knots with the autopilot doing just fine.
The above speeds were on the knotmeter, not the gps. We were in the middle of the Gulfstream for a lot of the trip, God knows what the sog was lol.
I've had the 40' tri surfing for briefer periods of time and she was very controllable and in my opinion very smooth riding.
Most people I've talked to seem to be less prone to seasickness on multis, but there seems to be a minority that has the opposite reaction.
Hard to come up with answers on this subject for everybody, you just have to give 'em all a try as much as possible.

Fair winds & calm seas solve it all lol.
__________________
Sail Fast Live Slow
FSMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-12-2015, 18:39   #21
Registered User
 
Training Wheels's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Left coast.
Posts: 1,451
Re: Mono Hull Verses Trimaran Pro's And Con's

Great post!


Sent from my iPad using Cruisers Sailing Forum
Training Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 09:07   #22
Registered User
 
FSMike's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bahamas/Florida
Boat: Solaris Sunstar 36' catamaran
Posts: 2,686
Images: 5
Re: Mono Hull Verses Trimaran Pro's And Con's

There is a good interview with Chris White in the fall 2015 issue of Multihulls Quarterly (published by the same folks that do water sailing">Blue Water Sailing magazine). Just found mine at Barnes & Noble, supposed to be on sale until January 2016.
In the interview Chris deals with some of the questions brought up in this thread.
__________________
Sail Fast Live Slow
FSMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 12:49   #23
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between the devil and the deep blue sea
Boat: a sailing boat
Posts: 20,437
Re: Mono Hull Verses Trimaran Pro's And Con's

I think decent ocean tris start at around 50' and so few ocean sailors have one.

A mono is like a cat, except the other hull is missing. A mono will roll, unless you get one of those ultra modern ones styled after Open boats.

A cat is a cat is a cat and today nearly everybody who can afford a cat, gets one. Except for out and out mono lovers.

Once you have clocked enough sea miles on each, you know what is good for you.

b.
barnakiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
hull, trimaran


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ballast tanks. Pro and con 20ft cruiser Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 1 21-01-2015 02:11
Pro's and con's of timber, steel and fiberglass for older boats. Phil S Construction, Maintenance & Refit 5 26-02-2014 04:20
wintering afloat or on the hard pro's and con's? monte General Sailing Forum 9 28-09-2013 08:12
Pro's and Con's of storage on the hard Gulfislander Anchoring & Mooring 18 09-10-2012 02:47
Twin keel v Fin keel, pro's n con's ? Davegw Monohull Sailboats 6 12-02-2009 02:08

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 20:26.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.