Ocean acidifcation .

[SailOar]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

There's a whole bunch of unemployed hippies/wannabe academics down south of me super-glueing themselves to roads as I type this. They're not fussed on India's efforts to reduce coal use it seems.

Does "what is a developing country" come up zip on a google search?

This is a first-grade level of argumentation. Did you raise your kids to be imbeciles?

[SailOar]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

I'm guessing thermodynamics isn't your field of specialty.

I wonder if you have any specialty at all?

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by SailOar

This is a first-grade level of argumentation. Did you raise your kids to be imbeciles?

Nah, I free ranged them.

Originally Posted by SailOar

I wonder if you have any specialty at all?

I once wrote a "hello world" program using nothing but machine code.

[Exile]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

Nah, I free ranged them.






I once wrote a "hello world" program using nothing but machine code.

I refuse to believe any of this unless you've read the study and can provide links. Otherwise I must conclude that you are being deceived by your own opinions.

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by Exile

I refuse to believe any of this unless you've read the study and can provide links. Otherwise I must conclude that you are being deceived by your own opinions.

Well I have to 'fess. The computer spat out "Hello Wrold!" despite my best efforts.



Which was disappointing.

[SailOar]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

Nah, I free ranged them..

Probably the best thing that ever happened to them.

[Exile]

Originally Posted by SailOar

Probably the best thing that ever happened to them.

I'm thinking that, at the very least, they must have a very good sense of humor.

[Lake-Effect]

Originally Posted by Exile

Dunning-Kruger. Plus a lot of anger. Only explanations I can see.

You're not fooling anyone. JD called it. If you're still intending to pass yourself off as a thoughtful skeptic, try to learn just a bit more about what you claim to be skeptical about.

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

The lack of an answer was far more thought provoking than an actual answer.

Your challenges are often downright Socratic, which makes them interesting and usually worthy of a ponder. But not always.

[newhaul]

This thread has gone all over but never said anything g serious .

I won't go back and refute all of the problems I have seen since my last post just say

Jack attack the science not me its gotten ridiculous.

The fact is we are cooling . And all of the pounding in your keyboards won't change that . You know who you are . Go sailing or something ...

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by SailOar

Probably the best thing that ever happened to them.

It failed miserably actually. One of 'em turned out to be a grossly overpaid coal miner. That's second place to kitten killer in some circles.

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by newhaul

This thread has gone all over but never said anything g serious .

I won't go back and refute all of the problems I have seen since my last post just say

Jack attack the science not me its gotten ridiculous.

The fact is we are cooling . And all of the pounding in your keyboards won't change that . You know who you are . Go sailing or something ...

I am supporting the science, not attacking it.

What We KNOW About Climate Change - Kerry Emanuel
https://youtu.be/7so8GRCWA1k

Professor Kerry Emanuel of MIT has been known for his "Show me the data!" approach to climate science. In this talk, he will present a long term, evidence-driven view of Earth's climate change, culminating in a discussion of current risks and implications.

The fact is we are warming and all the cherry picking will not change that.



RSS / MSU and AMSU Data / Time Series Trend Browser

[Exile]

Originally Posted by Lake-Effect

You're not fooling anyone. JD called it. If you're still intending to pass yourself off as a thoughtful skeptic, try to learn just a bit more about what you claim to be skeptical about.

Oh stop your fretting, as you need not worry. You see I've learned a LOT of valuable insight from these threads, most especially from you. But I'll have to look for another resource to learn more about the actual science. Then I'll come back and post a lot of links to studies rather than reading, writing and thinking for myself. I'm sure that'll make me feel smart!

[jackdale]

[QUOTE=Exile;2946921]ut I'll have to look for another resource to learn more about the actual science. /QUOTE]

I suggest you start with the Royal Society of the UK and the National Academies of Science of the United States.

Climate change: evidence and causes

https://royalsociety.org/topics-poli...idence-causes/

[Exile]

Originally Posted by jackdale

I am supporting the science, not attacking it.

What We KNOW About Climate Change - Kerry Emanuel
https://youtu.be/7so8GRCWA1k

Professor Kerry Emanuel of MIT has been known for his "Show me the data!" approach to climate science. In this talk, he will present a long term, evidence-driven view of Earth's climate change, culminating in a discussion of current risks and implications.

The fact is we are warming and all the cherry picking will not change that.



RSS / MSU and AMSU Data / Time Series Trend Browser

Rather ironic I suppose, but when I clicked on your youTube link this one popped up as "Up Next."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJwayalLpYY&t=89s

So I suppose we'll find out shortly what part of the science you "support" and which part you "attack."

Oh, and L-E, Lindzen's a skeptic too, he even made it to the Wiki list you've been ignoring. But unlike me, he's read a lot more studies and probably has a lot of citations, links, and sources he can cite, so little chance of your being fooled (this time ).

[jackdale]

Watch both Lindzen and Emanuel. They are both from MIT.

Originally Posted by Exile

Rather ironic I suppose, but when I clicked on your youTube link this one popped up as "Up Next."

So I suppose we'll find out shortly what part of the science you "support" and which part you "attack."

Oh, and L-E, Lindzen's a skeptic too, he even made it to the Wiki list you've been ignoring. But unlike me, he's read a lot more studies and probably has a lot of citations, links, and sources he can cite, so little chance of your being fooled (this time ).