|
12-03-2014, 08:21
|
#1
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Jacksonville/ out cruising
Boat: Island Packet 38
Posts: 31,351
|
Raritan PH II
Buying a new to me boat, both heads are Raritan PH II, one at least is in immediate need of rebuilding as it sprays water from the pump seal when the handle is pumped, but I bet both need overhaul. Boat and I assume heads are circa 1987.
Question is re-build, or replace? If replace I think unless crazy expensive I'd like to go to fresh water, electric head with large bowl. I believe the Admiral would like that.
If I replace which model fresh water, electric head is best in terms of reliability / serviceability?
|
|
|
12-03-2014, 08:35
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: On a boat
Boat: 1987 Cabo Rico 38 #117 (sold) & 2008 Manta 42 #124
Posts: 4,172
|
Re: Raritan PH II
We have the same head. Its a breeze to work on... but we replaced the whole thing with a brand new exact model when we bought the boat. In the world of boat bucks its not that expensive. We bought a couple of rebuild kits also.
If you go with an electric head like the vacuflush you will need to switch out your hoses to the vacuflush type. Run wire to operate the head and the vacuum pump/macerator, etc... So, you need to add that into your cost considerations.
|
|
|
12-03-2014, 08:36
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oriental, NC
Boat: Mainship Pilot 34
Posts: 1,461
|
Re: Raritan PH II
More boats probably have the Raritan PH II head than any other. It is rock solid reliable. You can completely rebuild it or just replace the pump seal. Easy to do. Just unhook the pump handle, unscrew the retaining ring and pry out the old seal and pop in a new one. But first try tightening the retaining ring. That might just be all that you need to do.
But if the Admiral wants an electric fresh water head, then the Raritan Elegance is a great one.
David
|
|
|
12-03-2014, 08:59
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Maine
Boat: Caliber 40LRC
Posts: 609
|
Re: Raritan PH II
Head history:
- 10 years ago on our Pearson it was a WC Skipper - awful device. Not reliable.
- 5 years ago on our Ericson it was a PHII with household sized bowl - Best value toilet. Very reliable if treated well.
- Now we have a Jabsco deluxe electric flush head with household size bowl. Great toilet. Very reliable. Have only replaced the Joker valve once in 4 years.
We also have a very reliable and low maintenance Lavac head. Uses a very simple and robust pump. Simple to use. No internal valve assemblies. Just a big manual pump for sucking water and waste through the bowl.
I believe this is the best of both worlds(manual and electric)
If you decide to keep the PHII, buy a new pump assembly. That way you are starting with a known good pump and keep a rebuild kit on hand. The leaking water could be from a crack that is unseen from improper winterization or other issues.
Also, Raritan makes a household size bowl for that unit. Definitely worth the upgrade if you have the space for it.
|
|
|
12-03-2014, 11:31
|
#5
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Boat: 1976 Sabre 28-2
Posts: 7,505
|
Re: Raritan PH II
Raritan stocks all the parts to replace every piece of the PHII but they aren't cheap, btdt. If you have to replace a major part, like the pump assembly, it's probably cost effective to buy a new head. Check the pricing on parts before you order them.
Have been using PHII's for going on forty years. Other than gross physical abuse, they are very reliable and easy to use. Every other marine head I've had the displeasure to come in close personal contact with has left me disappointed.
__________________
Peter O.
'Ae'a, Pearson 35
'Ms American Pie', Sabre 28 Mark II
|
|
|
12-03-2014, 13:55
|
#6
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Jacksonville/ out cruising
Boat: Island Packet 38
Posts: 31,351
|
Re: Raritan PH II
To quote Paul Harvey, here is the rest of the story. Boat has an aluminum holding tank, I'm theorizing that if I convert to fresh water flush my aluminum holding tank will last much longer and the best, easiest way to convert to fresh water flush is to buy a fresh water electric head?
Is this theory sound, or is it the waste that eats aluminum tanks and the salt water is irrelevant.
|
|
|
13-03-2014, 09:42
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nova Scotia until Spring 2021
Boat: Custom 41' Steel Pilothouse Cutter
Posts: 4,976
|
Re: Raritan PH II
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim R.
Head history:
- 10 years ago on our Pearson it was a WC Skipper - awful device. Not reliable.
- 5 years ago on our Ericson it was a PHII with household sized bowl - Best value toilet. Very reliable if treated well.
- Now we have a Jabsco deluxe electric flush head with household size bowl. Great toilet. Very reliable. Have only replaced the Joker valve once in 4 years.
We also have a very reliable and low maintenance Lavac head. Uses a very simple and robust pump. Simple to use. No internal valve assemblies. Just a big manual pump for sucking water and waste through the bowl.
I believe this is the best of both worlds(manual and electric)
If you decide to keep the PHII, buy a new pump assembly. That way you are starting with a known good pump and keep a rebuild kit on hand. The leaking water could be from a crack that is unseen from improper winterization or other issues.
Also, Raritan makes a household size bowl for that unit. Definitely worth the upgrade if you have the space for it.
|
We have a Lavac and are very happy with it. The PHII would be the only other contender from what I've heard.
Electricity and toilets, I feel, should not be in the same vicinity as my backside. Just a little quirk I have, I guess.
|
|
|
13-03-2014, 09:48
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nova Scotia until Spring 2021
Boat: Custom 41' Steel Pilothouse Cutter
Posts: 4,976
|
Re: Raritan PH II
Quote:
Originally Posted by a64pilot
To quote Paul Harvey, here is the rest of the story. Boat has an aluminum holding tank, I'm theorizing that if I convert to fresh water flush my aluminum holding tank will last much longer and the best, easiest way to convert to fresh water flush is to buy a fresh water electric head?
Is this theory sound, or is it the waste that eats aluminum tanks and the salt water is irrelevant.
|
I think that is very dependent on the level of dilution and the type of chemicals you throw down the head for reasons of "treatment". Some would actively damage aluminum, I think.
You may wish to rethink that holding tank in favour of HDPE plastic; a better choice, I feel, when the stakes are high.
Fresh water flushing is a good idea if you have that much fresh water; personally, I think salt water with a fresh water option (which demands a way, obviously, to isolate any potential contamination between the head and the FW tank) is that way to use the sea usefully, while a switch to fresh water kills the critters and flushes out the inevitable salts and minerals in your lines.
|
|
|
13-03-2014, 10:18
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Living aboard and cruising
Boat: Island Packet 40
Posts: 276
|
Re: Raritan PH II
The combination of salt water and urine will corrode the tank faster than fresh water. To allow fresh water flush you could T the input line with a valve to the sink drain, allowing you to fill the sink and pump from that. This would be a safer way then plumbing to the fresh water system.
__________________
Smooth seas never made an experienced sailor.
Bill
|
|
|
13-03-2014, 10:47
|
#10
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Jacksonville/ out cruising
Boat: Island Packet 38
Posts: 31,351
|
Re: Raritan PH II
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBW
The combination of salt water and urine will corrode the tank faster than fresh water. To allow fresh water flush you could T the input line with a valve to the sink drain, allowing you to fill the sink and pump from that. This would be a safer way then plumbing to the fresh water system.
|
I had thought of that, but to use the toilet you would first have to get on your knees to shut off the valve that is downstream of the "T", fill the sink, then use the toilet, and after get back on your knees and open the sink drain back up. I think just buying a fresh water head may be easier.
|
|
|
13-03-2014, 11:00
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Marathon, FL
Boat: Hans Christian 33
Posts: 652
|
Re: Raritan PH II
As for the toilet: I would say get a new one if you can. I had to rebuild ours the first time, and dealing with previous owner's stuff is just nasty.
As for us, we hated the Raritan. We rebuilt a couple of times and then got a new one. Hated it just as much. The top seal around the pump wouldn't last at all and always leaked. Replaced it with an electric head and have been quite happy with it for about 3 years now. Did have to replace the motor once though. I like the push button of the electric plus it macerates.
|
|
|
13-03-2014, 11:34
|
#12
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Jacksonville/ out cruising
Boat: Island Packet 38
Posts: 31,351
|
Re: Raritan PH II
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReMetau
As for the toilet: I would say get a new one if you can. I had to rebuild ours the first time, and dealing with previous owner's stuff is just nasty.
As for us, we hated the Raritan. We rebuilt a couple of times and then got a new one. Hated it just as much. The top seal around the pump wouldn't last at all and always leaked. Replaced it with an electric head and have been quite happy with it for about 3 years now. Did have to replace the motor once though. I like the push button of the electric plus it macerates.
|
Which electric did you get?
|
|
|
13-03-2014, 11:54
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Marathon, FL
Boat: Hans Christian 33
Posts: 652
|
Re: Raritan PH II
Well it hasn't received a lot of praise on this site, but we have the Jabsco electric. With the macerator that it uses, we were also able to replace our 1.5" hose with 1" hose.
|
|
|
13-03-2014, 12:28
|
#14
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Jacksonville/ out cruising
Boat: Island Packet 38
Posts: 31,351
|
Re: Raritan PH II
I hadn't thought about it until you brought it up, but replacing a 1.5" hose with a 1" hose sounds like it would be a lot easier than going back with 1.5" hose
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|