 |
|
21-06-2019, 10:56
|
#61
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Panama
Boat: Norseman 447
Posts: 1,520
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
My math skills fail me, but conductivity (measured in MHOs) is the reciprocal of resistance (measured in OHMs). So solder is about 1/10 as conductive as copper.
|
|
|
21-06-2019, 11:27
|
#62
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SoCal
Boat: Formosa 30 ketch
Posts: 980
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
You're too old school, the POLITICALLY CORRECT term is Siemens. MHOs, like CYCLES per SECOND, made to much sense.
|
|
|
21-06-2019, 11:53
|
#63
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Panama
Boat: Norseman 447
Posts: 1,520
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
I learned about mhos when I was studying for my first commercial ticket in 1958. I don’t think I’ve used them since. They’ve changed everything else, why not that too.
|
|
|
21-06-2019, 11:57
|
#64
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Bellport NY
Boat: Hinterhoeller Nonsuch 36
Posts: 3
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
If you are adding a crimped connector to a stranded wire it isn't a good idea to add solder because the stranded wire becomes stiffer. This could lead to breakage as pointed out by another poster about a butt splice in a high vibration region near the engine. What ever you do, don't use solid wire for the same reason!
|
|
|
21-06-2019, 11:59
|
#65
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BC
Boat: O'Day 40
Posts: 1,033
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
Can someone explain how a properly crimped butt connection is any more likely to fail than a properly crimped terminal lug.
__________________
Trying to make new mistakes.
|
|
|
21-06-2019, 20:04
|
#66
|
Marine Service Provider
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Victoria B.C.
Boat: CS27
Posts: 2,867
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcboomer
Can someone explain how a properly crimped butt connection is any more likely to fail than a properly crimped terminal lug.
|
It is not more likely to fail - with the emphasis on "properly crimped".
|
|
|
21-06-2019, 20:09
|
#67
|
cruiser
Join Date: Jan 2017
Boat: Retired from CF
Posts: 13,302
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcboomer
Can someone explain how a properly crimped butt connection is any more likely to fail than a properly crimped terminal lug.
|
The point is having any more joins than necessary is Bad.
But for the umpteenth time, if the join is done Right, and there's little weight/stress relief at the join, just check it periodically and you should be OK.
|
|
|
21-06-2019, 20:50
|
#68
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Location: cruising SW Pacific
Boat: Jon Sayer 1-off 46 ft fract rig sloop strip plank in W Red Cedar
Posts: 20,449
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
Re the lower conductivity of solder vs copper: Yes, solder is less conductive, but we're talking about a layer a few thousandths of an inch thick. The added resistance, voltage drop and heating are infinitesimal in extent and not worth worrying about, even with high currents as in a starter supply.
And everyone is always wanting tinned wire... and tin isn't much better than lead for conductivity... and how about the tin or solder coating on the lugs themselves?
Try to keep these things in perspective!
Jim
__________________
Jim and Ann s/v Insatiable II, back in Cygnet for the last days of summer.
|
|
|
21-06-2019, 23:45
|
#69
|
cruiser
Join Date: Jan 2017
Boat: Retired from CF
Posts: 13,302
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
With DC electricity, the current runs through the whole cross section of the wire equally. Any resistance from tinning is only when that is perpendicular to, the flow goes "through" it, and in those cases negligible.
The "skin effect" is AC only, flowing more at the surface especially at higher frequencies.
With a proper crimp - gas tight cold welded, there is no place for solder to get in the join anyway, adding solder **does nothing helpful**, only potentially harmful.
|
|
|
22-06-2019, 00:29
|
#70
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Panama, Central America
Boat: CT 49, 1989
Posts: 966
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
Quote:
Originally Posted by john61ct
With DC electricity, the current runs through the whole cross section of the wire equally. Any resistance from tinning is only when that is perpendicular to, the flow goes "through" it, and in those cases negligible.
The "skin effect" is AC only, flowing more at the surface especially at higher frequencies.
With a proper crimp - gas tight cold welded, there is no place for solder to get in the join anyway, adding solder **does nothing helpful**, only potentially harmful.
|
All the techno babble aside your last paragraph is something we can agree on. Proper crimps are considered the best by people much smarter than me.
Although I have recently been accused of this being advocating perfection and not practical in the real world.
I do agree with that, although we should try for perfection in the real world we might not make it. Sometimes we gotta do what we can to get the job done.
|
|
|
22-06-2019, 08:05
|
#71
|
cruiser
Join Date: Jan 2017
Boat: Retired from CF
Posts: 13,302
|
Re: Butt Splicing from Battery to Engine??
Absolutely, plenty of real-life owners just want what they consider good enough.
Or even just the bare minimum required to keep going, and if problems arise deal with it then.
That approach may be all that's possible sometimes, and temporary MacGyver fixes can have their own beauty, even elegance
|
|
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|