Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 16-11-2013, 08:53   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3
Engine pan/motor mount concern CS36

Hello forum. This is my first post-just joined today, but been reading and learning for past year or so. I am beyond thinking about, but not yet offer ready on my first sailboat. Long time dream kind of idea. A bit about me : to give you some context for my question. I am a civil engineer, presently in IT, very handy, so very comfortable with mechanical, electrical and wood work - though have no fibreglass skills.

I'm interested in a specific CS36 currently on the market. Seen it a few times, look lots of pictures, so now trying to understand exactly what I'm getting myself into. Attached is a picture of the starboard side, rear motor mount. The engine drives a vdrive, so belts etc are at the back. I'm told the Vetus m4.17 is 5 years old presently with 700 hours on the meter. It looks clean and well cared for - a bit of belt dust, but no leaks anywhere and underneath is clean.

My concern: the rear motor mounts are not installed correctly - two major problems with each. The one pictured (foreground is starboard rear)only has one bolt I assume because the original westerbeke mounts had a different layout. Also a couple chunks of steel have been bolted on to allow the mounts to fit - in essence cantilevering the weight/vibration of the motor over to the mount, and that mount only has one screw into the stringer. The weight of the engine hangs from the big bolt, the steel transfers it over to the flexible mount - the engine does not rest on the mount.

Assuming the motor is correctly aligned through the trans and the vdrive to the shaft ( the boat is presently on land so have not seen it run - so alignment is likely suspect) then I assume the motor mounts on the vetus are lower than the original engine, so there is not enough clearance for the mount body to fit under the engine mount itself. The installer made up the steel bits out of some scrap on hand and threw it together. Both rear mounts are almost identical. Rust etc is the least of my concern! I don't have picture of the front mounts, difficult to see, and I think the vdrive is the original - now painted yellow- so the big mounting bracket and bolts look very solid there. My sense is this motor is held in place by the fronts, and the vdrive - and the rear motor mounts come out for a nice ride. Worried about what happens to the shaft, seals and bearings if the engine moves around.

Thoughts on solution: 2 ideas - this is the part where I need your collective wisdom and experience.

1). There is little clearance between bottom of engine mount and top of fibreglass bed/stringer. If a second mount was used on each side, and a properly finished piece of steel angle run between them, the motor could be hung from that. That would resolve the obvious cantilever bend problem, but would still result in a vibrating weight being hung from a threaded bolt.

2) does anyone know what is under the fibreglass of the the engine bed stringers on a cs36? Found lots of references to solid mahogany timbers being glassed in place to provide the foundation on other rebuilds. If that's true for cs36 then the right answer might be to cut the fibreglass and rabbet/notch the wood, glass over the notch, thus provide a solid shelf for the mount to sit on properly. Looking at the picture, if that stringer is solid wood under the fibreglass the there is lots of wood there. A 2 inch deep notch would not sacrifice the structural integrity, and would still allow lots of depth to take the lag screw...As long as the timber is solid inside. I'd expect a canadian built boat would have solid spruce of pine in there.

Obviously I know I can walk away- but so far the rest of the boat is in good shape for an 1984. So my goal is to understand some options as I consider an offer. Thanks folks. Bryan
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image-1921688951.jpg
Views:	233
Size:	148.6 KB
ID:	70537  
BryanW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2013, 11:12   #2
Registered User
 
Sailmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston
Boat: ‘01 Catana 401
Posts: 9,626
Both of your solutions seem perfectly viable to me. And considering it's made 500 hrs already, if imagine you've got some time to think about it while using the boat.
I would personally go for the bridge connection, the engine is a lightweight for the size bolt the foot can accept.
Sailmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2013, 04:44   #3
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,431
Images: 241
Re: Engine pan/motor mount concern CS36

Greetings and welcome aboard the CF, Bryan.

http://www.closereach.com/csoa/cs36.htm

http://www.closereach.com/csoa/index.html
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2013, 06:37   #4
Marine Service Provider
 
Maine Sail's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maine
Boat: CS-36T - Cupecoy
Posts: 3,197
Re: Engine pan/motor mount concern CS36

Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanW View Post
Hello forum. This is my first post-just joined today, but been reading and learning for past year or so. I am beyond thinking about, but not yet offer ready on my first sailboat. Long time dream kind of idea. A bit about me : to give you some context for my question. I am a civil engineer, presently in IT, very handy, so very comfortable with mechanical, electrical and wood work - though have no fibreglass skills.

I'm interested in a specific CS36 currently on the market. Seen it a few times, look lots of pictures, so now trying to understand exactly what I'm getting myself into. Attached is a picture of the starboard side, rear motor mount. The engine drives a vdrive, so belts etc are at the back. I'm told the Vetus m4.17 is 5 years old presently with 700 hours on the meter. It looks clean and well cared for - a bit of belt dust, but no leaks anywhere and underneath is clean.

My concern: the rear motor mounts are not installed correctly - two major problems with each. The one pictured (foreground is starboard rear)only has one bolt I assume because the original westerbeke mounts had a different layout. Also a couple chunks of steel have been bolted on to allow the mounts to fit - in essence cantilevering the weight/vibration of the motor over to the mount, and that mount only has one screw into the stringer. The weight of the engine hangs from the big bolt, the steel transfers it over to the flexible mount - the engine does not rest on the mount.

Assuming the motor is correctly aligned through the trans and the vdrive to the shaft ( the boat is presently on land so have not seen it run - so alignment is likely suspect) then I assume the motor mounts on the vetus are lower than the original engine, so there is not enough clearance for the mount body to fit under the engine mount itself. The installer made up the steel bits out of some scrap on hand and threw it together. Both rear mounts are almost identical. Rust etc is the least of my concern! I don't have picture of the front mounts, difficult to see, and I think the vdrive is the original - now painted yellow- so the big mounting bracket and bolts look very solid there. My sense is this motor is held in place by the fronts, and the vdrive - and the rear motor mounts come out for a nice ride. Worried about what happens to the shaft, seals and bearings if the engine moves around.

Thoughts on solution: 2 ideas - this is the part where I need your collective wisdom and experience.

1). There is little clearance between bottom of engine mount and top of fibreglass bed/stringer. If a second mount was used on each side, and a properly finished piece of steel angle run between them, the motor could be hung from that. That would resolve the obvious cantilever bend problem, but would still result in a vibrating weight being hung from a threaded bolt.

2) does anyone know what is under the fibreglass of the the engine bed stringers on a cs36? Found lots of references to solid mahogany timbers being glassed in place to provide the foundation on other rebuilds. If that's true for cs36 then the right answer might be to cut the fibreglass and rabbet/notch the wood, glass over the notch, thus provide a solid shelf for the mount to sit on properly. Looking at the picture, if that stringer is solid wood under the fibreglass the there is lots of wood there. A 2 inch deep notch would not sacrifice the structural integrity, and would still allow lots of depth to take the lag screw...As long as the timber is solid inside. I'd expect a canadian built boat would have solid spruce of pine in there.

Obviously I know I can walk away- but so far the rest of the boat is in good shape for an 1984. So my goal is to understand some options as I consider an offer. Thanks folks. Bryan
CS used solid fiberglass u-shaped beams as stringers for the engine bed. There are some SS plate inserts, or steel on some boats, in the laminate. The stringers are hollow and have no wood to rot.. You can drill & tap, or as was done on ours, drill round pocket holes in the side of the stringers for access to proper nuts and washers...

__________________
Marine How To Articles
Maine Sail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2013, 15:42   #5
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3
Thanks gents. Great feedback and fastening options. Bryan
BryanW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 23:51.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.