Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-01-2017, 01:31   #1
Registered User
 
GILow's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the boat, somewhere in Australia.
Boat: Swanson 42 & Kelly Peterson 44
Posts: 9,155
Cooling paranoia or common sense?

Hi all,

I was just perusing the xylem systems site, thinking about engine cooling (as you do) when I stumbled on the following remark.

"DO NOT fit gearbox or engine oil coolers in the pump suction system. Always install them after the pump."

This was on the following page:

https://www.jabscoshop.com/advice-an...ling-pumps.htm

So, this is a bugger because my transmission cooler is most certainly on the input side of the pump.

Does anyone know if this bit of advice is just a general rule to cover the risk of introducing air into the suction side of the pump and thus stuffing up the flow characteristics or is there something more subtle I should be aware of?

Matt
__________________
Refitting… again.
GILow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 01:47   #2
Moderator
 
Pete7's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Solent, England
Boat: Moody 31
Posts: 18,466
Images: 22
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

Probably more to do with pressure, since the pump will create a partial vacuum which is only filled by air pressure forcing sea water into the cooling circuit from the outside. Whilst fitting the gearbox cooler afterwards means the pump creates a positive pressure which will be much higher to force water through the cooling circuit. You could see a bad layout with long pipes and bends having too much restriction to work properly.

That said my Volvo 2003 draws water from the seacock and then pulls it through the gearbox first before going on to the pump and the rest of the engine.

Pete
Pete7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 02:04   #3
Registered User
 
GILow's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the boat, somewhere in Australia.
Boat: Swanson 42 & Kelly Peterson 44
Posts: 9,155
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

Thanks Pete. So is your Volvo setup "standard" as far as you know? My setup seems to be a standard Diecon setup (Diecon were a company that did marine conversions of engines in Australia, they no longer do so).

Matt
__________________
Refitting… again.
GILow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 03:21   #4
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Germany
Boat: secondarily boatless
Posts: 184
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

Hi Matt,

it's a fairly simple matter. A watertight connection is by no means airtight - air will get into a standard hosebarb connection with ease. So when you design hydraulic systems you try to have as few connections as possible below ambient pressure, because the vacuum will pull in the air. The easiest way to do this is to put the pump first into the loop and then the remainder of the system has positive pressure and is safe.

What can happen? The only thing you have to watch for is airlock. When the pump draws in air, you can lose prime and thereby lose cooling. If your system has been working fine, I would not worry.

Oliver
Oliver L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 03:41   #5
Registered User
 
svseachange's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Cairns
Boat: Beneteau 323
Posts: 783
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

Our Volvo Penta AQD21B (Marinized Peugot 504/505) has a transmission and oil cooler enroute to the pump.

A few weeks ago I replaced the raw water strainer and hoses and was also wondering about the long path from the raw water inlet to the pump.
svseachange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 04:25   #6
Moderator Emeritus
 
a64pilot's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Jacksonville/ out cruising
Boat: Island Packet 38
Posts: 31,351
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

Any pump, pumps better than sucks. Max suction possible is about 14 PSI, but max pressure, is well usually a lot higher. Unless very shallow, a well pump is down in the well for example.
As a general rule always put "things" after a pump, it's why I wonder why seemingly all fuel filters are on the suction side? Perhaps we don't want to force fuel through s blocked filter, damaging it and allowing dirt through?
a64pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 05:34   #7
Registered User
 
TeddyDiver's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arctic Ocean
Boat: Under construction 35' ketch (and +3 smaller)
Posts: 2,761
Images: 2
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

There's a difference between water and oil or fuel. Water molecule is quite small, as small as most molecules in the air. Diesel fuel molecules are 10x larger and lubrication oil even more..
TeddyDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 06:04   #8
Writing Full-Time Since 2014
 
thinwater's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: PDQ Altair, 32/34
Posts: 9,615
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

Actually, in a cooling system the main problem not air at all, it is that water can be near its boiling point. Like having air in the system, the pump will fail, and it will fail when you need it most.

So long as everything stays below ~ 150F and there aren't too many bends the problem is not serious, but it can get bad fast.

It's just a good engineering thing that is often missed when installation guys get their hands on it. I promise the design engnieers did not draw it that way. I once started a recall of thousands of transit buses when a similar installation goof started ruining engines.

Worth fixing? Probably not, but the details (plumbing and cooler) matter.

__________________
Gear Testing--Engineering--Sailing
https://sail-delmarva.blogspot.com/
thinwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 09:57   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: North of San Francisco, Bodega Bay
Boat: 44' Custom Aluminum Cutter, & Pearson 30
Posts: 619
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

From my experience teaching pumping in the fire service, pumps push much more than they can suck. I would have nothing between the pump inlet and the seawater strainer and keep the run as short as you can, no extra fittings to create friction loss. One 90 degree elbow creates a large friction loss, anything disturbing the flow will make the pump work harder. I would place everything down stream of the pump and use high quality hose and fittings.
NorthCoastJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 10:45   #10
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Netherlands, Lemmer
Boat: Contest31HTac
Posts: 25
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

On a boat the gearbox cooler is normaly below waterlevel, so suction is normaly not a problem.

I allway wonder why most diesel-installations have the filters at the suction side, every leak sucs in air and the engine will stop. I mostly put in a separate pump immadiatly at the fuel tank.
B_Wieberdink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 10:51   #11
Registered User
 
Kokanee's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Adelaide Australia
Boat: Cuddles 30ft Motor Sailer
Posts: 286
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

Restrictions such as the gearbox cooler installed upstream of the pump will slow the circulation rate more than if installed on the downstream side. Especially if the impeller is slightly worn and not sealing 100%. The pump isn't acting in a fully positive displacement mode.

My new Vetus M4-45 is installed with the gearbox cooler upstream. I'd guess this may be to keep a standard engine hose configuration instead of having different setups for each available gearbox.

It has worked ok so far, but I noticed recently that my temperature is starting to climb a few degrees at higher revs. My impeller may be getting a bit of wear. I may look at reconfiguring the system.
Kokanee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 11:05   #12
Moderator
 
Pete7's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Solent, England
Boat: Moody 31
Posts: 18,466
Images: 22
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GILow View Post
Thanks Pete. So is your Volvo setup "standard" as far as you know? My setup seems to be a standard Diecon setup (Diecon were a company that did marine conversions of engines in Australia, they no longer do so). Matt
Matt yes standard set up. The VP 2003 gearbox has a small copper pipe that runs through it. You can see the circuit in this photo (not my engine). After the gearbox the black hose goes to the saw water pump on the front of the engine.

Pete
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	s-l1600.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	447.7 KB
ID:	138795  
Pete7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 11:17   #13
Moderator Emeritus
 
sailorchic34's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Boat: Islander 34
Posts: 5,486
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

As a general Rule all heat exchangers should be down stream of the raw water pump and not on the suction side. Reason being is there is a pressure drop across any heat exchanger and that will effect inlet suction pressure in what is essentially a unpressurized system.

As A64Pilot indicated, pump inlet suction pressure available is always lower then discharge head pressure.

While the typical raw water impeller is positive displacement, it is a low head pump and it works better with all the major head losses (from heat exchanger pressure drops) on the discharge side.

This is a much larger issue with centrifugal pumps which have generally very low NPSH (Net Positive Suction Head) Many an engineer has been caught, not understanding that very issue.
sailorchic34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 11:20   #14
Moderator Emeritus
 
sailorchic34's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Boat: Islander 34
Posts: 5,486
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

My yanmar as a transmission cooler, but the cooler inlet is connected to the discharge of the raw water pump and transmission cooler outlet is connected to the coolant tank heat exchanger inlet.
sailorchic34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2017, 12:34   #15
Registered User
 
Stu Jackson's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cowichan Bay, BC (Maple Bay Marina)
Posts: 9,706
Re: Cooling paranoia or common sense?

Quote:
Originally Posted by a64pilot View Post
..........it's why I wonder why seemingly all fuel filters are on the suction side? Perhaps we don't want to force fuel through s blocked filter, damaging it and allowing dirt through?
Exactly. In all proper pump applications, there is a filter before the pump. It "saves" the pump from damaging materials that don't belong inside the impeller.

For fuel systems, most factories plumbed tank>pump>filter. The little filters on the bottom of those Facet fuel pumps then ended up getting clogged. Most of us have corrected those poor installations.
__________________
Stu Jackson
Catalina 34 #224 (1986) C34IA Secretary
Cowichan Bay, BC, SR/FK, M25, Rocna 10 (22#) (NZ model)
Stu Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cooling


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Meathook Paranoia? rognvald Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 20 06-09-2016 19:52
Gulf Oil Spill - Common Sense Guide for Boaters Ocean Girl Cruising News & Events 33 28-06-2010 17:57

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:48.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.