Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Engines and Propulsion Systems
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-08-2022, 10:00   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Toledo
Boat: Pearson 30
Posts: 224
5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

Greetings,
When motoring is necessary, could a 5 hp ob push the boat in calm water or moving along with the current.
Any experience?
Your ideas are appreciated.
__________________
Captain's Corner YouTube video:

https://studio.youtube.com/channel/U...gZ0TNAegy_WZQA
Sailon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2022, 10:14   #2
Registered User
 
thomm225's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay Area
Boat: Bristol 27
Posts: 10,538
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

Sure it could.

Just make sure you get the motor in deep enough

James Baldwin's Main auxiliary for his 8400 lb Pearson Triton 28 is a 6 hp 4 stroke Tohatsu Outboard.

I've used a 5 hp outboard for years on my 6600 lb Bristol 27.

Sometimes motoring 20 miles across the lower Bay



thomm225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2022, 10:16   #3
Registered User
 
thomm225's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay Area
Boat: Bristol 27
Posts: 10,538
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW



6 hp outboard on Pearson Triton.
thomm225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2022, 10:16   #4
Registered User
 
Cheechako's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Skagit City, WA
Posts: 25,515
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

Yes a 5 hp will do it. But more HP for windy days or against the current is better.
__________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Broads and Boats. The rest I wasted" - Elmore Leonard











Cheechako is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2022, 10:23   #5
Registered User
 
thomm225's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay Area
Boat: Bristol 27
Posts: 10,538
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

Try to use one with a 25 inch extra long shaft which is what I have.

On windy days against the current use your sails to assist the engine.

I'm motoring for leverage here on the wind but will soon tack and motorsail the remaining 15 miles

thomm225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2022, 10:26   #6
Registered User
 
thesaltytar's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Savannah, GA
Boat: 1956 Bud McIntosh 36' schooner
Posts: 279
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

Hello Sailon1. I do actually have some experience with this. Also, I think five horsepower will be plenty for what you need.

We had to deliver our sailboat (36' on deck, full keel with lead, no weight data because the scale on the travel lift didn't work) from Rockland to Savannah last year. Unfortunately the engine stopped working in Rockland. We sailed off the dock and figured the rest out underway.

We have a Honda four stroke BF2D 2 horsepower outboard and an 8' inflatable. We put the out outboard on the inflatable and lashed the dinghy to the transom, opened the throttle all the way and made 5 knots. We kept the tiller amidships and steered with the vessel's rudder. The outboard has an internal 1/2 gallon tank that lasts almost exactly one hour for our purposes, maybe 65 minutes. So as long as I jumped into the dinghy once an hour and topped off, life was good.

We tied a string onto the kill switch and led it to the cockpit. For docking purposes you just throttle down a bit, maybe make one exploratory pass, then on final approach yank the string accordingly and step off onto the dock. If for some reason that doesn't appeal you can tow yourself in with the dinghy but I only did that once in the beginning.

Couple notes.

Have your engine fully serviced first. The daily running should actually be good for it and I doubt you will have much problem.

Take an extra fuel cap. Pulling into Portland I lost ours overboard and in an emergency maneuver put a bunch of holes into a ziplock bag that I duct taped over the fill port (with the holes not directly lining up between the two layers of plastic) to stop the gas sputtering all over the engine. I used super glue to attach some string to the replacement cap and tied it onto the engine. Yes the original cap had the plastic T thing that supposedly holds it to the outboard, no I don't trust that anymore.

The rubbing on your transom will leave a mark. To do it over I would hang a chafe mat over the stern of the boat.

Tie your inflatable off to your boat with two lines in case the first one chafes through and definitely have that kill switch string tied off... You don't want to watch your main engine take off at five knots without you.
thesaltytar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2022, 10:45   #7
Registered User
 
grantmc's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: home town Wellington, NZ and Savusavu Fiji
Boat: Reinke S10 & Raven 26
Posts: 1,235
Send a message via Skype™ to grantmc
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

For several years I used a Tohatsu 5hp with an 'extra long shaft' to power a 26 foot keeler. It is a 2-stroke with an in-built fuel tank. It was very successful pushing the boat at just a tad under 5 knots in calm conditions. But it was able to cope with some wind and/or current, just a little slower.

Reversing wasn't great but it was fine to back in to a slip.
__________________
Grant Mc
The cure for everything is salt water: sweat, tears or the sea. Yeah right, I wish.
grantmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 04:54   #8
Moderator
 
Jammer's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Boat: Tartan 3800
Posts: 4,851
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailon1 View Post
Greetings,
When motoring is necessary, could a 5 hp ob push the boat in calm water or moving along with the current.
Any experience?
Your ideas are appreciated.

We had an 8 HP high-thrust Yamaha extra long shaft on our 24' Morgan and later our 26' Hunter. It provided plenty of power for those boats. 5 hp on a larger boat would work OK but would not be ideal.



Outboards do have some drawbacks for this sort of thing. One fact to consider is that they don't have large alternators so they aren't a good source of electrical power. Ours had electric start and an alternator but it only produced around 6 amps.


Outboards can get swamped and fail in a following sea, because they are so close to the water.


It is awkward to operate the controls on many installations, because you have to reach over the transom. In most cases it is difficult for one person to simultaneously steer the boat with the rudder, and manipulate the steering, throttle, and shift on the motor, which makes docking difficult.
__________________
The best part of an adventure is the people you meet.
Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 07:21   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Toledo
Boat: Pearson 30
Posts: 224
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

Thank you for those excellent details. Very practical information. Using the outboard should save significant cost compared to the A4. Less pollution as well.
__________________
Captain's Corner YouTube video:

https://studio.youtube.com/channel/U...gZ0TNAegy_WZQA
Sailon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 07:23   #10
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Toledo
Boat: Pearson 30
Posts: 224
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

Quote:
Originally Posted by thesaltytar View Post
Hello Sailon1. I do actually have some experience with this. Also, I think five horsepower will be plenty for what you need.

We had to deliver our sailboat (36' on deck, full keel with lead, no weight data because the scale on the travel lift didn't work) from Rockland to Savannah last year. Unfortunately the engine stopped working in Rockland. We sailed off the dock and figured the rest out underway.

We have a Honda four stroke BF2D 2 horsepower outboard and an 8' inflatable. We put the out outboard on the inflatable and lashed the dinghy to the transom, opened the throttle all the way and made 5 knots. We kept the tiller amidships and steered with the vessel's rudder. The outboard has an internal 1/2 gallon tank that lasts almost exactly one hour for our purposes, maybe 65 minutes. So as long as I jumped into the dinghy once an hour and topped off, life was good.

We tied a string onto the kill switch and led it to the cockpit. For docking purposes you just throttle down a bit, maybe make one exploratory pass, then on final approach yank the string accordingly and step off onto the dock. If for some reason that doesn't appeal you can tow yourself in with the dinghy but I only did that once in the beginning.

Couple notes.

Have your engine fully serviced first. The daily running should actually be good for it and I doubt you will have much problem.

Take an extra fuel cap. Pulling into Portland I lost ours overboard and in an emergency maneuver put a bunch of holes into a ziplock bag that I duct taped over the fill port (with the holes not directly lining up between the two layers of plastic) to stop the gas sputtering all over the engine. I used super glue to attach some string to the replacement cap and tied it onto the engine. Yes the original cap had the plastic T thing that supposedly holds it to the outboard, no I don't trust that anymore.

The rubbing on your transom will leave a mark. To do it over I would hang a chafe mat over the stern of the boat.

Tie your inflatable off to your boat with two lines in case the first one chafes through and definitely have that kill switch string tied off... You don't want to watch your main engine take off at five knots without you.


Very useful information thank you.
__________________
Captain's Corner YouTube video:

https://studio.youtube.com/channel/U...gZ0TNAegy_WZQA
Sailon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 12:34   #11
Moderator
 
Adelie's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: La Ciudad de la Misión Didacus de Alcalá en Alta California, Virreinato de Nueva España
Boat: Cal 20
Posts: 20,557
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailon1 View Post
Thank you for those excellent details. Very practical information. Using the outboard should save significant cost compared to the A4. Less pollution as well.


If you are talking repair/replacement costs A-4 vs 5hp Tohatsu, yes the outboard will be cheaper.

For running costs the A-4 will be cheaper for several reasons:
A. Small outboards, even 4-stroke, tend to produce less power per gallon of gas than larger gas/petrol engines.
B. The A-4 swings a much larger prop at a lower speed than a 5hp outboard, even a high thrust model, and so provides the same thrust using less power (and fuel consumption) than an outboard.

I don’t think the outboard will produce less water pollution than an A-4, all of the hydrocarbons and the blow by from the outboard will go out the hub of the prop to bubble the the water.

Whether the A-4 exhaust winds up in the water depends on the particulars of your specific engine installation. Regardless, the A-4 using fuel more efficiently means less total pollution unless it’s losing compression and on its last legs anyway.

That said I would be inclined to install an outboard in a motor well for backup and replace the A-4 with electric propulsion and batteries.
__________________
Num Me Vexo?
For all of your celestial navigation questions: https://navlist.net/
A house is but a boat so poorly built and so firmly run aground no one would think to try and refloat it.
Adelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 16:25   #12
Moderator
 
Jammer's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Boat: Tartan 3800
Posts: 4,851
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

The Pearsons in the high 20/low 30ish size range were highly regarded in their day (1970s). Most were equipped with an Atomic 4 with a few getting a Farymann diesel that was IMO probably not an improvement. What often gets lost in these discussions is that the Atomic 4 was a good match for these boats and was, in its day, highly regarded for reliability, ease of maintenance, quiet operation, and (compared to diesel exhaust) minimal odor.


Pearsons have the high, narrow transom stern typical of the IOR era. Sharing the stern between a swim ladder and an outboard bracket will involve some compromises. There isn't a well for the outboard and probably no practicable way to add one.


These older boats don't have much resale so it really comes down to how long you're going to keep the boat, how much money you're willing to put into it, and whether your goals involve a lot of motoring. For most people the whole point of a 1970s boat is that they're cheap. Nothing wrong with that. If the Atomic 4 is in semi-reasonable condition it probably won't cost any more to get it working reliably than it would to buy a (used) outboard and a bracket, especially if you get the correct outboard for the situation (more than 5hp).


But yes, you can get by with a small outboard, keeping in mind its limitations.



I would be surprised if there would turn out to be a meaningful difference in fuel economy.
__________________
The best part of an adventure is the people you meet.
Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 17:13   #13
Moderator
 
Jim Cate's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: cruising SW Pacific
Boat: Jon Sayer 1-off 46 ft fract rig sloop strip plank in W Red Cedar
Posts: 21,185
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

Quote:
We had an 8 HP high-thrust Yamaha extra long shaft on our 24' Morgan and later our 26' Hunter. It provided plenty of power for those boats. 5 hp on a larger boat would work OK but would not be ideal.
Extrapolating from a HI THRUST 8 hp on a much lighter boat to a 5 hp standard on a heavier boat leads to a false conclusion of acceptable performance IMO.

To develop even its rated 5 hp, which will be required most of the time, the smaller motor will need to run at high rpms. It's tiny prop will be operating with a lot of slip and that is inefficient at best. This will inhibit operation when the conditions require more thrust, ie to windward or in chop. I don't think I would be happy with such performance... I can't speak for you!

Even though I am not an Anemic-4 fan, I think it a far better option for you.

Jim
__________________
Jim and Ann s/v Insatiable II, lying Port Cygnet Tasmania once again.
Jim Cate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 17:23   #14
Moderator
 
Jammer's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Boat: Tartan 3800
Posts: 4,851
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

I'm in complete agreement with Jim, actually.

The OP asked whether the 5 hp would be sufficient "in calm water or moving along with the current." So I answered the question.

I agree that to windward or in chop it would not provide satisfactory power.


It would be worthwhile, if proceeding with the 5hp, to fit the shallowest pitch prop that is available for it.
__________________
The best part of an adventure is the people you meet.
Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 17:36   #15
Registered User
 
thomm225's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay Area
Boat: Bristol 27
Posts: 10,538
Re: 5 hp Outboard on 30’ sloop (8600 lbs) vs 30 hp Atomic 4 on ICW

If the OP is like many cruisers and cannot deal with sailing without a powerful engine then he should definitely not get an outboard.

But if he would like to be somewhat challenged at times an outboard is perfectly fine for a boat of his displacement.

Most of us that have them use our sails to assist the engine as we are more about sailing than motoring, but if you are on a schedule sometimes you have to use you engine/outboard.

Some tend to forget folks sail round the world, across large bays, and across oceans with an outboard as the main auxiliary engine.

It's all about how much effort you want to expend.

It's all about what type sailor you are.

Are you the guy that uses mostly engine and maybe unfurls the jib from time to time or do you raise the main and sail the boat?

I see many cruisers that never raise their mainsail. They instead unfurl the jib and/or use their engine.

Outboards are also great for coming in your creek and docking. Not many sailboats can move 90 degrees off center like you can with an outboard. My outboard turns through about 200 degrees

Also my outboard has no alternator or electric start. I didn't want all the extra crap. No extended controls either. I didn't want those cluttering up my cockpit.

I use solar for power. I would definitely not want to run an engine or generator for power with all that racket and smell and waste fuel..

thomm225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
icw, outboard, sloop


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are my anchors obsolete? CQR 60 Lbs, Delta 55 Lbs, Bruce 20 kg ErikFinn Anchoring & Mooring 122 27-08-2016 11:40
For Sale: 14 lbs & 22 lbs Delta Anchors (Southern California) AmericanVagrant Classifieds Archive 2 22-03-2016 14:01
For Trade: 45 lbs CQR for 60 lbs Danforth Daniela Tartau Classifieds Archive 0 08-09-2010 15:29

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 00:09.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.