Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-02-2020, 06:32   #16
Registered User
 
Sand crab's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Boat: 34' Crowther tri sold 16' Kayak now
Posts: 5,067
Re: Tomcat 32 foot catamaran question

Quote:
Originally Posted by valhalla360 View Post
It's basically a Gemini knockoff with a few modifications

I don't see the comparison. The G105mc is 2 feet longer but 2 feet narrower. You can get the Gem into a standard slip but may have issues with the TC. The TC has a tramp, outboards and higher bridgedeck clearance. The Gem has solid foredeck diesel with Sillette, and is pretty damn low. And because of the narrow width the Gem has to be sailed with some caution. I think the TC is a better built boat as well. I also think it's a better boat if you were going offshore.



On the other hand if I was looking for a boat for just cruising around Puget Sound the the Gem would be worth a look.
__________________
Slowly going senile but enjoying the ride.
Sand crab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2020, 07:52   #17
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: ABC's
Boat: Prout Snowgoose 35
Posts: 1,756
Re: Tomcat 32 foot catamaran question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sand crab View Post
I don't see the comparison. The G105mc is 2 feet longer but 2 feet narrower. You can get the Gem into a standard slip but may have issues with the TC. The TC has a tramp, outboards and higher bridgedeck clearance. The Gem has solid foredeck diesel with Sillette, and is pretty damn low. And because of the narrow width the Gem has to be sailed with some caution. I think the TC is a better built boat as well. I also think it's a better boat if you were going offshore.



On the other hand if I was looking for a boat for just cruising around Puget Sound the the Gem would be worth a look.
What caution is that? The Gemini is narrow but that doesn't mean it's any less stable than wider cats such as the Lagoon 380. It has a much shorter mast and sail area with lower centre of effort. Hence will have a similar static and dynamic stability rating as a wider cat with taller mast and greater sail area. Weight is also important. The heavier cat having more stability all other things being equal, so load her up with beer and eat a few pies to prevent flying a hull
mikedefieslife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2020, 00:43   #18
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,004
Re: Tomcat 32 foot catamaran question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sand crab View Post
I don't see the comparison. The G105mc is 2 feet longer but 2 feet narrower. You can get the Gem into a standard slip but may have issues with the TC. The TC has a tramp, outboards and higher bridgedeck clearance. The Gem has solid foredeck diesel with Sillette, and is pretty damn low. And because of the narrow width the Gem has to be sailed with some caution. I think the TC is a better built boat as well. I also think it's a better boat if you were going offshore.
Knockoff doesn't mean exact same specs down to the millimeter. It's pretty much the same design brief and very similar layout. It's a small really shallow draft simple cat that can fit into most (but not all) standard slips.

I indicated there were some differences. (PS: lots of older Geminis are outboard powered and not a few retrofit with twin outboards)
valhalla360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2020, 14:01   #19
Registered User
 
sjm823's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Saint Augustine
Boat: 2003 PDQ 36 Capella
Posts: 60
Re: Tomcat 32 foot catamaran question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Sweet View Post
There have been many threads about small cats, but......

My wife and I are looking for a small bluewater capabable cat. for a 1-3 year sail.
We've been looking at Lagoon 380's, but honestly, I'd rather something smaller for the two of us. We want the benefits of a cat, but are looking for something simple. The nicest thing about a 380 or a Mahe 36 is their track record and that they've been all over the world. Leading me to my question:

Is there any reason a TomCat Catamaran at only 32 feet would not be as safe for ocean crossing as a 380 or Mahe 36? Is there something else I'm missing?

Length: 32 feet
Beam: 16 feet

Thanks for your opinons.
Brian Sweet
Winthrop, WA
Just following up on Brian Sweets post, did you buy the TomCat, and if so, what has been your experience?
sjm823 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
catamaran, omc

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tomcat 6.2 catamaran osbornemc Multihull Sailboats 29 17-07-2024 16:19
TomCat 6.2 Andrew Kay Multihull Sailboats 17 16-08-2020 18:14
Gemini or TomCat ? Canibul Multihull Sailboats 35 03-02-2017 01:49
TomCat 9.7 Blondibear Multihull Sailboats 3 06-10-2010 17:08
TomCat 9.7 vs Seawind 1000XL Andrew Kay Multihull Sailboats 15 06-08-2007 05:22



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.