Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > Multihull Sailboats
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 29-03-2021, 04:09   #91
Registered User

Join Date: May 2014
Boat: Shuttleworth Advantage
Posts: 2,268
Images: 2
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by smj View Post
Your ability to easily tack probably comes from momentum due to weight, not anything to do with aerodynamics.

Agreed, it is much harder to tack a light fast cat than a heavy slow cat because the acceleration and deceleration is so much greater.
Tupaia is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 04:53   #92
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: On the boat
Boat: LAGOON 400
Posts: 2,349
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by smj View Post
Your ability to easily tack probably comes from momentum due to weight, not anything to do with aerodynamics.
acknowledged one advantage of heavier cats. I thought you are "light and narrow is always better" camp ?
arsenelupiga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 04:54   #93
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: On the boat
Boat: LAGOON 400
Posts: 2,349
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tupaia View Post
Agreed, it is much harder to tack a light fast cat than a heavy slow cat because the acceleration and deceleration is so much greater.
yeah, fast cats have larger tack angle, so maybe that is why is harder ? We do routinely sub 90 deg tacks.
arsenelupiga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 04:57   #94
Registered User

Join Date: May 2014
Boat: Shuttleworth Advantage
Posts: 2,268
Images: 2
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenelupiga View Post
yeah, fast cats have larger tack angle, so maybe that is why is harder ? We do routinely sub 90 deg tacks.

Nothing to do with tack angles. It just requires a bit more skill and experience when sailing a light cat but it is worth it to get where you are going so much quicker.
Tupaia is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 05:22   #95
smj
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2007
Boat: TRT 1200
Posts: 7,274
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenelupiga View Post
acknowledged one advantage of heavier cats. I thought you are "light and narrow is always better" camp ?


For sailing performance light and narrow is always better, something I enjoy.
smj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 05:47   #96
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: On the boat
Boat: LAGOON 400
Posts: 2,349
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tupaia View Post
Nothing to do with tack angles. It just requires a bit more skill and experience when sailing a light cat but it is worth it to get where you are going so much quicker.
we travelled with light dagger cat, 38 ft, direct upwind in bumpy conditions and it was bit faster, say 10 % faster VMG. However I noticed quite jerky movement of that boat compared to ours. Wondered how comfortable that is? My wife said she enjoyed our trip so i guess we were moving considerably less.
arsenelupiga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 16:34   #97
Registered User
 
fxykty's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Indonesia
Boat: Outremer 55L
Posts: 3,837
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenelupiga View Post
we travelled with light dagger cat, 38 ft, direct upwind in bumpy conditions and it was bit faster, say 10 % faster VMG. However I noticed quite jerky movement of that boat compared to ours. Wondered how comfortable that is? My wife said she enjoyed our trip so i guess we were moving considerably less.

Not to be pedantic, but movement of a boat looks much worse from outside than it does when you’re on that boat. As an example, when racing in a one tonner regatta a while ago, going upwind in near gale conditions close to a sistership, we looked over at the other boat and thought “wow, they’re really getting thrown around, glad we’re not on board her”. Meanwhile, we had two crew debilitated by sea sickness throwing up into the cockpit and a full main completely down traveller and flattened (no reefs) to try to limit heel to 30*. We of course were moving around just as bad.

The 38 foot cat you were looking at likely weighs half as much as your cat, so of course it will be moving around more. Comfort is in the eye of beholder - did the light cat’s crew complain?
fxykty is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 16:38   #98
Registered User
 
fxykty's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Indonesia
Boat: Outremer 55L
Posts: 3,837
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenelupiga View Post
if ease of tacking is any indication of aerodynamics above water, then you are wrong. Virtually never had tacking problem, even in sub 5 kn winds.

Well, at 5 knots of wind there isn’t much effect of the aerodynamics. But at 20+ knots? In commensurate seas? I think you will find (perhaps have found) that the tacking of a less hydro and aero dynamic boat will be more difficult.

That might be one of the reasons one doesn’t often see less sea kindly boats sailing upwind?
fxykty is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 16:41   #99
Registered User
 
fxykty's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Indonesia
Boat: Outremer 55L
Posts: 3,837
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tupaia View Post
Agreed, it is much harder to tack a light fast cat than a heavy slow cat because the acceleration and deceleration is so much greater.

In very light wind and flat sea conditions possibly.

Increase the wind and seas - the hydro and aero dynamics start to matter a whole bunch more than displacement. Too much drag and a tack won’t be possible without engine assistance.
fxykty is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 19:22   #100
Registered User
 
44'cruisingcat's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,398
Images: 69
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenelupiga View Post
if ease of tacking is any indication of aerodynamics above water, then you are wrong. Virtually never had tacking problem, even in sub 5 kn winds.
Neither have I.

In fact one of the first sails on my boat was in 2 - 4 knot winds. Never missed a tack, and we did plenty.

The thing is, while a lighter boat might lose more speed during a tack, it would have been going much faster to start with.
__________________
"You CANNOT be serious!"


John McEnroe
44'cruisingcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 19:27   #101
Registered User
 
44'cruisingcat's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,398
Images: 69
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by fxykty View Post
Not to be pedantic, but movement of a boat looks much worse from outside than it does when you’re on that boat.
Very true. Or more accurately, it looks worse than it feels.

Fat hulls with lots of rocker definitely appear to pitch far more than slender hulls with little rocker. Which is exactly what you'd expect.
__________________
"You CANNOT be serious!"


John McEnroe
44'cruisingcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2021, 23:37   #102
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: On the boat
Boat: LAGOON 400
Posts: 2,349
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44'cruisingcat View Post
Very true. Or more accurately, it looks worse than it feels.

Fat hulls with lots of rocker definitely appear to pitch far more than slender hulls with little rocker. Which is exactly what you'd expect.
i duno about your theory, my wife likes going upwind so it is quite comfortable. Sure looked rocky that boat 30 deg forward, 30 deg back. Maybe he was pushing too much. In saying that I do have some rules for upwind. Basically keep hulls glued to sea. This improves comfort and boat structure says thanks. If I cant do that increase angle and if my VMG falls enough then motors until tack. Sometimes one gets waves at angle from wind and one tack is useless, however the other is usually close to ideal.
arsenelupiga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-07-2021, 22:43   #103
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Florida
Boat: None currently
Posts: 42
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by john manning View Post
My comment on your goal is why are you thinking fast. If you extend your argument to its maximum, just fly to the destination and charter.

Is your goal sailing or are you just travelling somewhere.
Every boat sails in good winds.
A fast boat sails in light winds.
A heavy boat motors in light winds.

If your goal is sailing, you want a "fast" boat. I don't care about top speed, I'm not interested in racing. In high winds we will keep the boat below a max speed target with reefing.

All airplanes exceed that max speed target.
rexripley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2021, 13:22   #104
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 212
Re: Surprising results looking at Catamaran Performance Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by rexripley View Post
Every boat sails in good winds.
A fast boat sails in light winds.
A heavy boat motors in light winds.

If your goal is sailing, you want a "fast" boat. I don't care about top speed, I'm not interested in racing. In high winds we will keep the boat below a max speed target with reefing.

All airplanes exceed that max speed target.

That's a very good response to my comment. I own two heavy yachts and while they both sail in light winds its a bit like watching paint dry.
john manning is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
catamaran


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Surprising Tools You Can't Live Without redhead Our Community 47 20-04-2018 13:37
Fridge Performance Test Results ayates Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 2 25-02-2018 16:36
Great Lug Crimper... Surprising ! ColdEH Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 44 16-12-2014 06:52
Surprising weather Western Med?? OysterDriver Cruising News & Events 6 23-04-2014 12:24
The Results are In... ssullivan Multihull Sailboats 15 13-03-2008 04:50

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 00:22.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.