 |
|
21-06-2012, 10:10
|
#46
|
Marine Service Provider
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Currently aboard Queensland
Boat: Woods Vardo 34 Cat
Posts: 3,847
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
The Tiki 38 is a HUGE (crazy???) project. Wharram says 2200 hours, but most builders seem to be withing 5000-8000 hours. One recently launched in CA was 6000 and said to be workboat like and much time saved from various smart techniques.
Personally, I'm sure they could be done in less time. I think a certain amount of the time can be attributed to the type of person that is attract to the overall larger Tiki concept.
There was a guy in NY started with a crew in Jan. Looked to be setting a recored for Tiki 38 construction, but seems to have stopped posting/ building? Montiki or Montauk Tiki something like that.
__________________
@mojomarine1
|
|
|
21-06-2012, 14:49
|
#47
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pacific NW
Boat: Hedley Nicol Vagabond MK2, 37'
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
Dude, Then that would make it closer to the 100 sheets of the Jarcat......part of that weight is the extra stick too. Still silly to compare a box with bananas........
|
|
|
22-06-2012, 08:18
|
#48
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pacific NW
Boat: Hedley Nicol Vagabond MK2, 37'
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
I looked into the Tiki 38 a little more, part of the extra weight is heavier ply scantlings which means fewer sheets for the weight. The point is a 1/2" sheet takes the same amount of epoxy to coat as a 3/8" etc.....One advantage the classic designs have is if you can use tools well, bonding to the stringers takes less epoxy than making fillets keeping costs down. Those hour build totals seem like the time put in by people who where new to boat building- very high. It is a reminder to project contemplaters who are not used to production working and building that any construction type may take longer than expected. Buying infusion gear is a big cost and the materials loss potential is pretty high. It also takes controlled building habits. Finding a method that is enjoyable to use can make the difference between finishing or not so factor it in on the spreadsheets.
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 11:55
|
#49
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 156
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by cat man do
If that was actually true we would be seeing more wharrams on the water than any other design.
Why is this not even close to being the case?
|
What is the case is that no matter what anchorage you visit anywhere in the world you have a good chance of finding a Wharram. They go places and provide their crew with lots of fun. And yes, they are relatively safe.
I sailed a Tiki 30 in the northeast USA for a few years. Very enjoyable but too basic for real cruising, IMHO. If you are the spartan type, however, they may be ideal.
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 12:11
|
#50
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brisbane Australia [until the boats launched]
Boat: 50ft powercat, light,long and low powered
Posts: 4,409
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurwg
What is the case is that no matter what anchorage you visit anywhere in the world you have a good chance of finding a Wharram.
|
Bollocks.
I could count wharram sightings over 35 years on the water on two hands.
Possibly only two for sale in the world at present shows they are less common than you think.
http://yachthub.com/list/search.html...atch=all+words
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 12:40
|
#51
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 267
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 12:43
|
#52
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brisbane Australia [until the boats launched]
Boat: 50ft powercat, light,long and low powered
Posts: 4,409
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by cat man do
Possibly only two for sale
|
Pay special attention to the word in red.
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 13:00
|
#53
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 267
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
Possibly only one boat for sale.
Possibly we are part of a construct and we are only batteries for a world ruled by machines.
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 13:02
|
#54
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,399
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
I've seen a lot more than ten Wharrams just in the last couple of years.
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 13:04
|
#55
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 267
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
In response to the O.P you mentioned trailering the boat.
Are you plannning on trailering the boat whole or breaking it down each time.
I have read that the tiki 30 can take over a day, more like 2, to set up from scratch, attaching beams etc.
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 13:34
|
#57
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hurricane Highway
Boat: O'Day 28
Posts: 3,917
|
Re: JARCAT CC29 vs WHARRAM TIKI 30
Well, I had built a couple of dinks before my Wharram Hinamoa 23. The plans were very expensive even back in the day. And simple. I could have built it without plans. Over the years, I've considered just that. But the memories of very limited accomodation, and poor windward performance combine to keep me sane. I've only seen two Wharrams come through Beaufort (a major stop on the ICW). There are several other designs in the 30' range based here.
However, hundreds of larger modern cats have come through. I've been in a Gemini. Wouldn't want a smaller multi.
|
|
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|
|