Quote:
Originally Posted by barnakiel
Indeed it will be interesting to see how the foils get employed in ocean going multis and monos.
|
I think foils make sense for multihulls... because of the geometry. All the attempts with canting keels or even horizontal
keel bombs on monohulls looks for me like a "bad attempt" to pretend something what cant be (constructively).
I am not a friend of engineering following the motto: "What is possible can be done". Or as we like to say: For an
engineer nothing is too difficult to do. So looks the design, e.g. the IMOCA Safran built in 2014.
I prefer the method "simplyfing your life"... same on
boats. More simple the solutoin, more easy going.
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnakiel
Vide recent IMOCAs - all with foils! Expect plenty of damage ... to catch the attention of the crowds ;-)
|
Yeah.. they look spectacularly... lots of action for the eyes. I really hate these "mega sized surf boards" so it looks for me.... and their attempts to become technically a system of ballast and balance, which one easily can realize on a multihull/trimaran.
Why it needs a "flying keel" ? Its like "a
monohull want imitate a multihull". Does that make sense ?
For prototyping as realized with "SpeedDream" it might be an interesting playground for boat
builder, engineers, sail makers...
The most natural approach to nature for me is a
multihull. Look at the Polynesians, they had been smart to build
Proas. Why ? As it makes sense to take an outrigger as ballast instead a deep and heavy
keel bomb (
Rec.: A
trimaran is nothing else than glued together two Proas.)
I'd prefer to sail a
Racing Proa instead of an IMOCA :-)
... as already did
Multihull designer Nick Newick in the 60th for
Skipper Tom Follet who participated in 1968 for the OSTAR (Observer's Singlehanded Trans-Atlantic Race) from Plymouth,
England to
Newport,
Rhode Island on Nick's two masted proa
Cheers.