Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 30-11-2016, 14:01   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1
Aventura 33 Review

My wife & I are planning on moving aboard, hopefully sooner than later. We're looking at moderately sized cats that have good livability & can confidently cross oceans. We've been watching the prices on the Mahe evo's for some time. A friend of ours told us to check out the Aventura 33. The Aventura 33 is a fairly new boat, which makes finding testimonials & reviews difficult. Any advice on this particular vessel or others like it would be much appreciated.
313-mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2016, 17:44   #2
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 357
Re: Aventura 33 Review

Here's a test by multihulls world, but you have to pay for it:

Full test by Multihulls World - AVENTURA CATAMARANS - Aventura 33 - multihulls-world.com
__________________
Herreshoff preferred Multi's...........
"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." A. Lincoln
PhiSig1071 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 06:34   #3
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,439
Images: 241
Re: Aventura 33 Review

Greetings and welcome aboard the CF, Mike.
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 07:26   #4
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 357
Re: Aventura 33 Review

I did a bit of looking after finding the article by MW. Looks like a very interesting boat! The layout looks smartly designed and very roomy for its size. I question the two-cabin, two-head version though. On a boat that size I think three-cabin, one-head makes more sense. You won't often have guests on a boat that size, and for the infrequent times you do sharing a head wouldn't be a big deal. Having a complete third cabin for stowage would be more beneficial, especially for living aboard. I like the tiller steering, its a great way to maximize space in the cockpit and it probably makes the boat fun to hand steer. Not sure if it would make installing an autopilot more difficult? The ability to "confidently cross oceans" comes down to design and build. Unfortunately I don't know enough about the boat to say definitively where she stands one way or another on that. But I will say she has an awfully high freeboard for a 33ft cat. That might give me pause.
__________________
Herreshoff preferred Multi's...........
"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." A. Lincoln
PhiSig1071 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-11-2017, 18:53   #5
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2013
Boat: Balance 442
Posts: 8
Re: Aventura 33 Review

Aventure recently came up with a new model - Aventura 34. I think it is a replacement for 33. I am looking for somebody who owns/sailed aventur 33 to figure out how good this boats are. Quality, performance?
promanus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2017, 14:31   #6
Registered User
 
beauris's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: le Marin martinique
Boat: NEEL 45 #1
Posts: 102
Re: Aventura 33 Review

if i remember well the architect does not want his name associated with the aventura brand as he believes there was too many quality problems.

however this is just a memory of something i read at the time, it does not mean it s true just that you should be cautious.... after all i bough a neel 45 and everyone has seen the vids....
beauris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2017, 09:32   #7
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Columbia, MD
Boat: Seawind 1160 Lite
Posts: 98
Re: Aventura 33 Review

When we were shopping for our cat, I was intrigued by the Aventura 33. I had an email exchange with the architect, Martin Defline, and he had indicated if we were interested in moving forward, it would be best to find a yard to do a custom build. At the end of the day, we felt the 33 was a bit too small for how we plan to use the boat and weren't prepared to manage a custom build project. So far, we are extremely happy with our choice of going with the Seawind.
indimini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2017, 09:50   #8
Registered User
 
beauris's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: le Marin martinique
Boat: NEEL 45 #1
Posts: 102
Re: Aventura 33 Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by indimini View Post
When we were shopping for our cat, I was intrigued by the Aventura 33. I had an email exchange with the architect, Martin Defline, and he had indicated if we were interested in moving forward, it would be best to find a yard to do a custom build. At the end of the day, we felt the 33 was a bit too small for how we plan to use the boat and weren't prepared to manage a custom build project. So far, we are extremely happy with our choice of going with the Seawind.
it more or less confirm my post
beauris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2019, 02:40   #9
Registered User
 
axiomoixa's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Germany
Boat: dream of one
Posts: 27
Re: Aventura 33 Review

I found these.. (see attached)

We are considering the Aventura 34. Would be happy to hear how the community sees her as well.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf aventura-33_us.pdf (1.97 MB, 320 views)
File Type: pdf Aventura 34 - 21121.pdf (1.45 MB, 373 views)
axiomoixa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2019, 05:33   #10
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Jan 2018
Boat: FP Maldives
Posts: 303
Re: Aventura 33 Review

I never saw one live, but from pictures i can easily say that it's (another) catamaran that try to be something that, with that given size, should not be.
riki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2019, 03:48   #11
Registered User
 
axiomoixa's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Germany
Boat: dream of one
Posts: 27
Re: Aventura 33 Review

I managed to find the specifications in English.
Could someone comment on the hull construction? is this monolithic polyester laminate good?
Is that on-par with the big brands like Lagoon, FP?
Or is that considered inferior?
Attached Files
File Type: pdf A34_specifications_en.pdf (583.1 KB, 200 views)
File Type: pdf A34_pricelist.pdf (303.0 KB, 177 views)
axiomoixa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2019, 04:07   #12
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Working in St Augustine
Boat: Woods Vardo 34 Cat
Posts: 3,865
Re: Aventura 33 Review

Displacement 4000 kg
Lightship 3500 kg

500 kg payload!!!
__________________
@mojomarine1
Boatguy30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2019, 13:08   #13
Registered User
 
44'cruisingcat's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,398
Images: 69
Re: Aventura 33 Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by axiomoixa View Post
I managed to find the specifications in English.
Could someone comment on the hull construction? is this monolithic polyester laminate good?
Is that on-par with the big brands like Lagoon, FP?
Or is that considered inferior?
Of the three commonly used resin types, being polyester, vinylester and epoxy, polyester is the cheapest and least desirable.
__________________
"You CANNOT be serious!"


John McEnroe
44'cruisingcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2019, 13:21   #14
Registered User
 
Sailmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston
Boat: ‘01 Catana 401
Posts: 9,626
Re: Aventura 33 Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44'cruisingcat View Post
Of the three commonly used resin types, being polyester, vinylester and epoxy, polyester is the cheapest and least desirable.


But also the most commonly used
Sailmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2019, 14:03   #15
Registered User
 
44'cruisingcat's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,398
Images: 69
Re: Aventura 33 Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailmonkey View Post
But also the most commonly used
Because it's the cheapest.

Vinylester isn't much more expensive and has far better properties. IMO a builder using polyester instead of vinylester would have to be considered questionable as regards quality of product. Particularly in a multihull where strength of secondary bonds is very important, and polyester performs so poorly.
__________________
"You CANNOT be serious!"


John McEnroe
44'cruisingcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aventura 4 World Cruiser DeepFrz Monohull Sailboats 5 15-07-2014 13:24

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 00:21.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.