 |
|
29-11-2018, 02:41
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Oz
Posts: 1,042
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 03:15
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Back home
Boat: Amel Euros 41
Posts: 211
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Cape Town gets some really nasty blows from mountains, specially on afternoons. Even in the city one has to grab for a lamp post when hit by one of those. That doesn't keep locals having a cool evening sail though.
Lost our genua when turning into Hout Bay few miles South of Cape Town. Was waiting for a wind shadow to roll it up. A mistake.
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 03:23
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Spain
Boat: Beneteau Oceanis 350
Posts: 8
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Factor
|
It doesn't mention the kind of boat (photo is from iStock). It just says it was in a river and the boats there are not maintained and over crowded/loaded.
Sad part is that you're right, African disasters rarely make mainstream western media - as if it didn't matter almost
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 10:18
|
#19
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: aboard, cruising in Australia
Boat: Sayer 46' Solent rig sloop
Posts: 26,848
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bean Counter
|
Thank you for that.
Ann
__________________
Who scorns the calm has forgotten the storm.
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 10:41
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Southern MD, Chesapeake Bay
Boat: Catalina & Maycraft
Posts: 996
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Factor
Normal orientation for a mono
|
well... it hasn't fully sunk-
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 11:33
|
#21
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Boat: MacGregor 26
Posts: 263
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardhead
well... it hasn't fully sunk-
|
Probably just a well set anchor at low tide with too short a scope for the tidal range..
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 15:12
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane after cruising (Atlantic -> Med -> Carib -> Pacific)
Boat: Vancouver 36, Hobie 33, Catana 48, now all with new owners
Posts: 360
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul L
True but clearly it hasn't sunk by the definative CF definition. No reason the crew couldn't scamper up the mast and comfortably sit on the spreaders awaiting an easy rescue.
|
I think most people would agree that that one was sunk assuming it was sitting on the bottom. It does appear that "sunk" has a number of vague definitions in colloquial usage, but if trying to avoid confusion I think there is only one definition that is easily measured, and that is it's afloat if the water is supporting it, it's sunk if the bottom is supporting it. I know this still leads to some corner cases, where an item is neutrally buoyant, but those cases are not likely to matter unless we shift the conversation to submarines.
Note that I don't think anyone here has suggested that "not sunk" is equivalent to habitable. That is a rather complex and subjective assessment that not only depends on the inherent buoyancy of a boat, but the distribution of the buoyancy in that particular boat, the water temperature, sea state etc.
However, I'd suggest that there are a number of advantages of unsinkable boats (ones with positive inherent buoyancy) but habitability after holing may not be one of them in many cases. Some of the advantages I see are:
- larger target for rescuers to locate
- possibility of escape from enclosed spaces
- possibility of recovering useful items
- possibility of using it as shelter while waiting for rescue, depending on design etc
- possibility of recovery of the boat, depending on circumstances
Note that once a boat has sunk in deep water - i.e. gone to the bottom, none of the above things seem to be options.
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 16:06
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bellingham
Boat: Outbound 44
Posts: 9,319
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Mark
Not sinking is better than sinking, no doubt. On the unsinkable Cat thread I posted a picture of a 49ft Cat with a small bit of one bow still above water after a fire in a remote anchorage. By the CF definition it hasn't sunk. Perhaps a distinction without a difference.
A large steel hull mono might have burnt its interior as the foam filled Cat did but still be truly floating, ie not sunk. Its all a tradeoff, but marketing cruising boats as unsinkable is just marketing and sounds so much sexier than sink resistant.
__________________
Paul
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 16:09
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Southern MD, Chesapeake Bay
Boat: Catalina & Maycraft
Posts: 996
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark_morwood
I think most people would agree that that one was sunk assuming it was sitting on the bottom. It does appear that "sunk" has a number of vague definitions in colloquial usage, but if trying to avoid confusion I think there is only one definition that is easily measured, and that is it's afloat if the water is supporting it, it's sunk if the bottom is supporting it. I know this still leads to some corner cases, where an item is neutrally buoyant, but those cases are not likely to matter unless we shift the conversation to submarines.
Note that I don't think anyone here has suggested that "not sunk" is equivalent to habitable. That is a rather complex and subjective assessment that not only depends on the inherent buoyancy of a boat, but the distribution of the buoyancy in that particular boat, the water temperature, sea state etc.
However, I'd suggest that there are a number of advantages of unsinkable boats (ones with positive inherent buoyancy) but habitability after holing may not be one of them in many cases. Some of the advantages I see are:
- larger target for rescuers to locate
- possibility of escape from enclosed spaces
- possibility of recovering useful items
- possibility of using it as shelter while waiting for rescue, depending on design etc
- possibility of recovery of the boat, depending on circumstances
Note that once a boat has sunk in deep water - i.e. gone to the bottom, none of the above things seem to be options.
|
Good points- As a different issue, how often do rescuers leave an abandoned boat floating, after the unfortunate sailors have been taken off? It seems it would be a real hazard to others, but from many accounts I've read, they seem to leave them adrift. Is that the general maritime practice?
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 20:55
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Boat: Dragonfly 1000 trimaran
Posts: 7,028
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosierdoc
Probably just a well set anchor at low tide with too short a scope for the tidal range..
|
The owner probably just wanted to do a really good scrub and rinse of the bird poop on the decks without having to run the watermaker.
__________________
The question is not, "Who will let me?"
The question is,"Who is going to stop me?"
Ayn Rand
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 21:18
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Currently cruising the Philippines, just got back from PNG & Solomons
Boat: Wauquiez 45' (now 48') catamaran
Posts: 994
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardhead
Good points- As a different issue, how often do rescuers leave an abandoned boat floating, after the unfortunate sailors have been taken off? It seems it would be a real hazard to others, but from many accounts I've read, they seem to leave them adrift. Is that the general maritime practice?
|
I think you're right. In most cases, the boats are left still floating, which makes them a hazard to navigation. I think everyone's focused on saving lives, which is as it should be, but there's rarely the correct follow-through. I heard of 1 case of a cat sailing from NZ to Tonga & having to abandon. They were picked up by a freighter, & after discussion, the freighter rammed the cat repeatedly to make it break up. But I don't think it happens often. And yes, while fire is an enemy of all boats, especially fiberglass boats, sandwich-construction boats (most cats, & an increasing number of monos) are very hard to sink.
|
|
|
29-11-2018, 22:24
|
#27
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Boat: Boatless Again
Posts: 6,239
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Ann, looking at the news article in the OP, it appears that the boat received immediate attention from the rescue authorities.
What impresses me in the photos is how high in the water the boat is riding, compared to some half-sunken capsized cruising cats I have been seeing lately. Either there was a lot of air trapped in the hulls or this is a really light boat.
|
|
|
30-11-2018, 13:07
|
#28
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: aboard, cruising in Australia
Boat: Sayer 46' Solent rig sloop
Posts: 26,848
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Quote:
Originally Posted by donradcliffe
Ann, looking at the news article in the OP, it appears that the boat received immediate attention from the rescue authorities.
What impresses me in the photos is how high in the water the boat is riding, compared to some half-sunken capsized cruising cats I have been seeing lately. Either there was a lot of air trapped in the hulls or this is a really light boat.
|
Hi, Don, hope you all are well. Yes, if it is a particularly light cat, all the easier for a beam puff to give it a shock.
Ann
__________________
Who scorns the calm has forgotten the storm.
|
|
|
30-11-2018, 13:20
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto area when not travelling
Boat: Nonsuch 30
Posts: 1,601
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
When we there the locals said to watch the table cloth on Table Mountain. When you see the clouds falling down the mountain you will get strong katabatic winds a bit offshore. Same thing in Simonstown around the corner to the east. Winds of 40 to 50 knots are commonplace. I don't know how the docks at the Simonstown YC stand up to the tremendous load - they were a bit bent but only a bit. We waited for a nice day to go around the Cape of Good Hope and ended up having motor the whole way - which was a good thing.
__________________
Have taken on the restoration of the first Nonsuch, which was launched in 1978. Needs some deck work, hull compounding, and a bit of new gear.
|
|
|
30-11-2018, 14:16
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Boat: Boatless Again
Posts: 6,239
|
Re: Any info on this accident?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPA Cate
Hi, Don, hope you all are well. Yes, if it is a particularly light cat, all the easier for a beam puff to give it a shock.
Ann
|
Happy Holidays to you and Jim, Ann. We are all well, and I'm off to Cabo on Monday to deliver a boat back from the HaHa. .
|
|
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|
|