One big problem I have with brokers is the geographic issue. With real estate agents, you select an agent and they show you houses in your location. But boat brokers are different. I looked at 3 Sagas before we bought. One in Toronto, one in
Florida, and our final one in
Annapolis. We never "worked with a broker."
The first, we contacted the broker, drove to Toronto, looked at the boat, and passed.
The second was word of mouth, no broker involved. It failed
survey. Bummer.
The third, we called the listing broker, looked at it, he wrote up the
contract. We are happy buyers.
Now, the question. Let's assume I reached out to a broker to help me buy a boat. He wouldn't have "found" any of them, as the listed boats were on yachtworld (or not listed at all). He would only have actually seen the one we finally bought, as that was in my home town and I can't imagine an
Annapolis broker would have gone on a showing in Toronto or
Florida. He probably would have insisted someone (me!) pay him a commission on the private
sale even though he would have provided no services. Would he have been able to do a better job of finding a
surveyor than I did (enter NAMS, do a search, call surveyors)? What value would a broker have provided in this search?
OP has indicated he has similar issues. Distance is a minor object, his target boats are limited and likely dispersed. Any broker he engages will only present him boats listed on yachtworld, and OP is looking for additional sources. And any broker he engages won't go see most or even any boats.
I do ask this sincerely. To my mind, the answer is "nothing." But, conventional wisdom disagrees with me. What am I missing?