|
|
30-08-2011, 16:12
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Boat: Bristol 38.8
Posts: 1,625
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
IMHO the best rig is a sloop with a self-tacking blade jib on a furler and a light air sail on a furler ahead of the jib. Having owned a cutter I would not own one again. Too much work unless you only tack or jibe once a day. If you need a storm sail, put a removable inner forestay on the sloop to hank on a storm jib.
No matter where you sail, you will be sailing in 5-10 knots of breeze much more often than you will be sailing in 35-40+ knots. If you sail in 40+ knots alot, then get a cutter rigged ketch.
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 16:44
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Petersburg, AK
Boat: Outremer 50S
Posts: 4,229
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
I have to weigh on the side of a cutter if it is a true cutter. That places the mast somewhat further aft than a sloop that has had a baby-stay inserted and a small staysail rigged.
For cruising I have spent more time with a single- or double-reefed main and staysail than any other combination. When you reduce sail to this level on a cutter all of the sails are brought in closer to the center of the boat, providing better balance than a sloop with a small jib way out front.
If the cutter is rigged properly then the staysail and the jib can be flown at the same time upwind, with the low pressure on the back side of the staysail creating a draft through the slot that actually increases performance. This requires a good understanding of how the leads need to be rigged and the sails trimmed.
For tacking if both sails are up then the jib slides over the staysail and there isn't much issue. Problems arise when sailing with jib/genny alone, and you have to get the sail past the staysail stay. Having a hanked on staysail and removable stay makes that easier, but we have tended to just deal with the problem and walk the sail around in light air.
So, if the mast is far enough aft to allow a usefully sized staysail then I would heartily recommend it. If the staysail is really just being inserted in the foretriangle of a sloop then not so much.
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 17:21
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dsanduril
I have to weigh on the side of a cutter if it is a true cutter. That places the mast somewhat further aft than a sloop that has had a baby-stay inserted and a small staysail rigged.
For cruising I have spent more time with a single- or double-reefed main and staysail than any other combination. When you reduce sail to this level on a cutter all of the sails are brought in closer to the center of the boat, providing better balance than a sloop with a small jib way out front.
If the cutter is rigged properly then the staysail and the jib can be flown at the same time upwind, with the low pressure on the back side of the staysail creating a draft through the slot that actually increases performance. This requires a good understanding of how the leads need to be rigged and the sails trimmed.
For tacking if both sails are up then the jib slides over the staysail and there isn't much issue. Problems arise when sailing with jib/genny alone, and you have to get the sail past the staysail stay. Having a hanked on staysail and removable stay makes that easier, but we have tended to just deal with the problem and walk the sail around in light air.
So, if the mast is far enough aft to allow a usefully sized staysail then I would heartily recommend it. If the staysail is really just being inserted in the foretriangle of a sloop then not so much.
|
We have a true cutter rig on our 44' cat and love our staysail. Agree with all that Dsanduril has to say. The staysail helps us tack finer (35 to 40 degrees off) gets an extra knot when tacking and provides great peace of mind. As soon as the wind gets over 20 knots we furl the genoa and pull on the furling staysail. Tacking on a partly furled genoa is not good. Bad sail shape, bad stresses on the furler, poor sailing angle - forget it and use your staysail.
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 20:02
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Back in Northern California working on the Ranch
Boat: Pearson 365 Sloop and 9' Fatty Knees.
Posts: 10,488
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
Please consider this...Is your vessel truly a cutter or a sloop with an inner forestay? A cutters mast is almost 1/2 way back, whereas a sloops is about 1/3 way back.
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: Wow - what a ride!"
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 20:09
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Palma Mallorca
Boat: Fisksatra Havsfidra
Posts: 72
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
seems to be little mention of running backstays, my equivalent to the flu for shorthanded sailing. Never seen a sloop with an inner forestay and running backstays, and never seen a true cutter without. IŽd opt for without anyday.
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 20:42
|
#21
|
Eternal Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tarpon Springs FL
Boat: Cabo Rico 38
Posts: 1,987
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gracies
seems to be little mention of running backstays, my equivalent to the flu for shorthanded sailing. Never seen a sloop with an inner forestay and running backstays, and never seen a true cutter without. IŽd opt for without anyday.
|
Mine's a "true" cutter and doesn't have running backstays.
Rich
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 20:47
|
#22
|
CF Adviser
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: sausalito
Boat: 14 meter sloop
Posts: 7,260
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
I'm enjoying the discussion here, despite being a sloopster.
In my mind, a true cutter flies a yankee and a staysail. Equally, I think of a genoa as a sloop sail, not a cutter sail.
Am I wrong?
__________________
cruising is entirely about showing up--in boat shoes.
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 20:49
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Palma Mallorca
Boat: Fisksatra Havsfidra
Posts: 72
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
Just googled your 38. True it doesnŽt have running backstays but how swept back are the spreaders? You must have something to counter the extra forces on the rig??
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 21:30
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Narragansett Bay
Boat: Able 50
Posts: 3,139
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabo_sailor
Mine's a "true" cutter and doesn't have running backstays.
Rich
|
It doesn't need them because it has a pair of fixed aft lowers on each side. I know that one is attached to the spreader base - not sure how much farther up the other goes. They do the job of runners. The spreaders on those boats are quite high and would be about 3/4 of the inner forestay height. The aft lowers have more effect on the inner forestay than on many other boats, especially ones with two pairs of spreaders.
The downside is that the shape of the inner forestay is fixed giving less control over the staysail/solent.
Just for the record Gracies, the spreaders on a standard rigged Cabo Rico 38 are in line. I guess cabo_sailor's boat is standard factory rig. I can't tell from the avatar.
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 22:02
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Alameda, CA
Boat: C&C Newport 41
Posts: 586
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bash
In my mind, a true cutter flies a yankee and a staysail. Equally, I think of a genoa as a sloop sail, not a cutter sail.
|
i was thinking the same thing but giving my knowledge of cutters is purely academic i dont knwo what is actually / practically the case.
there is also a financial component as i have a genoa and mail but the jib is junk so i have to replace 1 sail. if i can use the genoa as the yankee and replace the stay and only have to buy 1 new sail.
as opposed to buying a yankee and stay.
given she is a total refit the few thousand i dont spend on a 2nd sail can be the sole or battery bank or any one of 45873598437593759379 other things.
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 22:17
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sea of Cortez and the U.P. of Michigan
Boat: Celestial 48
Posts: 905
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
Last boat had a removable staysail stay.
In light air I would stow in near forward shroud. Easy tacking my 120%
In higher winds would fly staysail. If wind lowered, I could unroll the genny. Wind back up, roll genny back in.
Usually kept the stay rigged unless I knew I had considerable tacking to do. I could tack headsail with the stay in-place, but was a minor pain in ass to accomplish.
If using a roller furler on head, a staysail gives more options. If hanked-on headsails, would have other sail options so that staysail would not so desirable IMHO.
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 22:22
|
#27
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sea of Cortez and the U.P. of Michigan
Boat: Celestial 48
Posts: 905
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celestialsailor
Please consider this...Is your vessel truly a cutter or a sloop with an inner forestay? A cutters mast is almost 1/2 way back, whereas a sloops is about 1/3 way back.
|
I don't think the difference is near this big between sloop and cutter. Maybe 1 or 2 feet further back for the mast for "true cutter".
But I ain't no naval architect.
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 22:23
|
#28
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NSW AUSTRALIA
Boat: L. Francis Herreshoff H28 Ketch & Brisol 24 @ 25'
Posts: 1,181
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
My advice as the absolute basics would be to use the 130% genoa for downwind work and then get a tall slim jib cut especially for upwind sailing. Mine is mitre cut. You will find this jib with a compatible staysail is a really nice easy to handle combination that you will use a lot more than you expect.
One thing I would be checking is if you can fold/flake the big Genoa onboard. Otherwise you need to get a cover made so you can get it out of the way and out of the sun easy.
__________________
Life is a shipwreck but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats. - Voltaire
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 22:25
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Back in Northern California working on the Ranch
Boat: Pearson 365 Sloop and 9' Fatty Knees.
Posts: 10,488
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis.G
I don't think the difference is near this big between sloop and cutter. Maybe 1 or 2 feet further back for the mast for "true cutter".
But I ain't no naval architect.
|
It depends on the boat. If you look at a Tayana 37, it is clearly dead center.
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: Wow - what a ride!"
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 23:55
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Petersburg, AK
Boat: Outremer 50S
Posts: 4,229
|
Re: Sloop vs Cutter
I wasn't trying to be extremely specific by using "true cutter", more just trying to describe the difference in the size of the foretriangle, but there is a distinction. And that distinction has changed over time. Initially a cutter described a job function for the boat, then it came to define a hull shape associated with those boats, then the double headsail rig (generally with the outer jib set on a removable stay from the bowsprit), then the modern "definition", which seems to be a general consensus of a mast set back about 50% of the boat length or sail plan length.
There's an old woodenboat forum that discusses this in some detail. For those boats that are close to a sloop in terms of mast placement, but have two headsails, they suggested the term "slutter". I always kind of liked the ring of that.
As to running backstays, I see that at least two of us here who really love our cutter rigs are multihullers. On our boats the running backs generally lead to the outside edge of the boat, and are therefore far enough out that we don't need to play with them when tacking - they are far enough outboard that the downwind running back doesn't chafe (much) on the main even if it is left snugged up. I have sailed monohull cutters as well (I still like the versatility), and the running backs can increase the work load when beating.
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|