Not directly related to mizzen stays’ls, but otherwise to the title of this thread:
Should I contemplate getting a
wind vane?
“Equilibre” displaces maybe 24 tons in cruising trim. I have two of all sorts of things but just one
rudder, and am required to state (and maybe to demonstrate) how I would steer the boat if my
steering system failed (not how I would cope with a
rudder jammed hard over, which would be a problem of a higher order).
I will be sailing from NZ to
Vanuatu,
New Caledonia, etc and then back. The long legs are 1200 nm plus, and no land much nearer than the departure or
destination points.
So far, I have used my hydraulic
autopilot most of the time at sea, so I can’t say whether I can get the boat to steer herself on every point of sailing. However, with two
furling fores’ls and a reefable mizzen I should be able to do so, at least on a close/fetch.
Only one or two
wind vanes are powerful enough for my boat, it seems; but the claims for these sound believable.
Apart from the need for
emergency secondary
steering, I have loved having
wind vane steering in the past (Monitors). The eee-aaaw
noise of the reversing
motor on any large
autopilot is annoying, and its
consumption of electrons mounts up.
So should I rig up transom mounts for an
emergency rudder (and get one made up) and commit to hand-steering home if necessary, or should I spend out on a wind vane which can double as an emergency rudder?
Costs are always a consideration - I reckon 1000 currency units for the mountings / fitting of either; say 2000 for an emergency rudder and 8000 for a powerful wind vane which can do both jobs-. Significant differences but not conclusive.
Any thoughts, ketchies?
Keith