My main was replaced by the PO with a
furling boom, boom is a little longer than original was and the sail is full battened and has a lot of roach. I don’t know how much larger the main is, but it’s larger.
In short with the main fully up and properly trimmed, the
boat is not trimmed well at all, to get a neutral
rudder position it took either easing off the main sheet or reefing the sail a few feet. That was with a 110
Genoa.
So I had a 135
Genoa made reasoning that the bigger
head sail would move the center of pressure further aft and I could properly trim the main.
Well guess what, it didn’t change anything at all. I can only assume Mack
Sails knew what they were doing and cut the bigger Genoa so that it wouldn’t change trim.
Now I have a cruising
code zero, from what I can tell essentially a lightweight fuller cut 170 Genoa. Now surely this 170 Sail would move the center of pressure aft and cause the
Boat to trim much different?
Well guess what, it doesn’t.
I can only assume that a
sailmaker can cut a sail so that even a bigger sail does not move the center of pressure much?
The clew height does appear to be higher on the 135 than the 110, and the code 0 even higher, but that is just an observation, no measuring.