Polar Bears:
Scientific name: Ursus maritimus
Inuktitut Name: Nanuq
T
he IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group [PBSG] lists the polar bear as a “vulnerable species”, citing sea ice loss from climate change as the single biggest threat to their survival; as well as human activities, such as hunting,
oil and gas development, and industrial activities in the Arctic, that increase the risk of exposure to pollutants, and toxic substances.
These challenges, along with the potential
introduction of new predators, and competition for
food, due to climate change, pose a significant threat to the survival of the polar bear population.
*
The ice is the foundation of Arctic
marine life, the ecosystem on which bears rely for every aspect of their lives.
It is where they mate, and raise their cubs.
Sea ice is also an essential habitat for the polar bear’s primary
food, ringed
seals, as they pup and rest on the ice.
Current knowledge shows that polar bears have some capacity to adjust to the warming Arctic, but the loss of sea-ice habitat may be happening too rapidly to allow for adaptation, and there are no substitutes [on land] for the fat-rich
seals, on which the bears depend.
In addition to climate warming, other challenges to the bears include increased
commercial activities, conflicts with people, pollution, disease, inadequate habitat protection [of denning and seasonal resting areas], and the potential for over-harvest in smaller, or declining, polar bear populations.
The number of polar bears, worldwide, is not increasing.
Some populations are recovering, after their numbers were vastly reduced by uncontrolled hunting, in the 1960s, but that potential for growth is running
head first into declining carrying capacity, in some regions, due to loss of sea ice habitat.
Related to this, residents of many communities in
Hudson Bay are seeing more polar bears. These polar bears are increasingly getting into food caches, entering camps, and posing risks to communities, and residents.
The observation that “people are seeing more bears, in and around sites of human activities” is real evidence of a change from the past conditions northern residents knew.
Evidence shows that, in the
Hudson Bay system, polar bear body condition has been declining, bears are having fewer cubs, fewer cubs are surviving after birth, and the population size has declined.
These two different pieces of knowledge/evidence are easy to integrate: As malnourished bears spend more time on land, for longer periods, more are venturing into settlements, where they are looking for food, leading to increased polar bear-human conflicts.
Based on an aerial
survey in 2021, Canada's Western Hudson Bay population dropped by 27 percent, in just five years, from 842 bears to 618, continuing the declining trend of the past 30 years.
Previous aerial surveys showed a drop of 11 percent from 2011 to 2016. The population estimate is now roughly half of what it was in the 1980s, when studies using a different technique showed 1,200 bears.
The Southern
Beaufort Sea population [along the northern coast of
Alaska and western Canada] plunged by about 40%, over a 10-year study period, from 2001-2010, dropping from about 1,500 to 900 bears. More recent population estimates are not yet available.
* “Status Report on the World’s Polar Bear Subpopulations” ~ IUCN/PBSG [October, 2024]
➥
https://www.iucn-pbsg.org/wp-content...l_2024Oct7.pdf
Population Status ➥
https://www.iucn-pbsg.org/population-status/
Learn more about the scientific methods employed by polar bear researchers throughout the Panarctic:
➥
https://www.iucn-pbsg.org/#top