|
|
19-02-2011, 16:20
|
#1
|
Long Range Cruiser
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australian living on "Sea Life" currently in England.
Boat: Beneteau 393 "Sea Life"
Posts: 12,820
|
'Big Catch' S/V Quest Capture - Non-Politcal !
"But we have been told they are Americans.... This could be a big catch."
AFP have a new report that is interesting:
AFP: Pirates bringing hijacked US yacht to Somali lair
Quote:
Abdi Yare, a top pirate commander in Hobyo, 500 kilometres (300 miles) northeast of the capital Mogadishu, said the boarding squad that captured the yacht left a week earlier from Harardhere, another pirate base further south.
"The pirate team that hijacked the yacht is led by a senior commander from the Harardhere area," he said.
"I think they will bring them (the hostages) here, near Hobyo, to negotiate the ransom," Yare added.
|
Now can we keep this thread on track?
Mark
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 16:24
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Erie Canal between Rochester & Buffalo
Boat: 1970 23' O'day pop-top
Posts: 471
|
I read the military is hoping to cut them off before they hit land.
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 16:29
|
#3
|
Elvish meaning 'Far-Wanderer'
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boat - Greece - Me - Michigan
Boat: 56' Fountaine Pajot Marquises
Posts: 3,489
|
I'm not sure what the track is but,
"This could be a big catch"
1) Lots of money due to being American
2) Americans pay ransom
3) Retaliation for the prison sentence.
I'm not sure why it's a big catch. The primary motive is money so I would guess they are planning on getting a lot of it. I just read that the US plan is to intercept before they make landfall. We'll know by tomorrow morning how that worked out.
__________________
Our course is set for an uncharted sea
Dante
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 16:59
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Boat: Tartan 30
Posts: 1,548
|
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 17:20
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Boat: None at this time
Posts: 8,462
|
What in the world were those people thinking of sailing through that area? Or were they thinking at all?
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 19:18
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Boat: Tartan 30
Posts: 1,548
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenny chaos
We had all these opinions in the other thread that got closed.
Let's keep this one open for the facts coming out.
Thanks-
Kenny
|
OIC, wasn't following the other thread... So, question... Is this the first US flagged vessel? or the First US flagged private yacht? or not the first at all?
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 19:21
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vancouver, Wash.
Boat: no longer on my Cabo Rico 38 Sanderling
Posts: 1,810
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeepFrz
What in the world were those people thinking of sailing through that area? Or were they thinking at all?
|
Instead of gross speculation, why don't we ask our own Mark J. He made this same passage.
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 19:31
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Boat: 1972 Tartan 34C Fleur De Mer
Posts: 141
|
I agree with DeepFrz, why would you sail in known pirated waters.
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 20:17
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vancouver, Wash.
Boat: no longer on my Cabo Rico 38 Sanderling
Posts: 1,810
|
I receive sailnet reports from a person I met in Trinadad in 2003. He's somewhere in the middle of the Indian Ocean and is headed for Capetown.
I think some armchair experts shouid adjust to a cruising reality. You make personnal choices and accept the responsiblity for the outcome of those choices.
I've seen no post in either one of these threads where there was any concern for the safety of the crew. Why's that?
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 20:28
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Anacortes, WA
Boat: Maine Cat 41
Posts: 325
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John A
I receive sailnet reports from a person I met in Trinadad in 2003. He's somewhere in the middle of the Indian Ocean and is headed for Capetown.
I think some armchair experts shouid adjust to a cruising reality. You make personnal choices and accept the responsiblity for the outcome of those choices.
I've seen no post in either one of these threads where there was any concern for the safety of the crew. Why's that?
|
Mostly because we fear it's a 'given' that their safety has been compromised at this point. (i.e. They're not having fun now) I can't imagine that there's anyone who is NOT concerned for the outcome.
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 20:52
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Virginia, USA & Krabi, Thailand
Boat: Wauquiez Pretorien 35
Posts: 2,819
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John A
I receive sailnet reports from a person I met in Trinadad in 2003. He's somewhere in the middle of the Indian Ocean and is headed for Capetown.
I think some armchair experts shouid adjust to a cruising reality. You make personnal choices and accept the responsiblity for the outcome of those choices.
I've seen no post in either one of these threads where there was any concern for the safety of the crew. Why's that?
|
Why wouldn't you apply the above to the crew as well?
__________________
Mundis Ex Igne Factus Est
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 21:16
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 329
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cchesley
Mostly because we fear it's a 'given' that their safety has been compromised at this point. (i.e. They're not having fun now) I can't imagine that there's anyone who is NOT concerned for the outcome.
|
I do hope they come out of this okay. All the same though,I think they have avoided trouble so many times in the past that they got careless.It is a Criminal Act in some countries to hand out Bibles.I am a Christian but,GOD did give me common sense and my common sense tells me to stay away from those areas.The head pirate guy obviously knew they were heading his way,why else would he have left a week early to catch up with them.
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 21:54
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Boat: Tartan 30
Posts: 1,548
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joey69
|
Nice, and they just delete the original article instead of correcting it... I wanted to re-read it since I recall it said something about a 'reliable source'. Preemptive strike...
Anyway, the only blame in this entire situation should be placed on the perpetrators of the crime. You don't blame a person for getting mugged because they went jogging in central park. The blame is upon the perpetrator, period. This is not a war-zone, and these people had every right to travel that route. Statistically they were probably safer than you or I driving to work in the morning. No doubt they were aware of the risk and made their decision accordingly, nobody can judge them for that.
|
|
|
19-02-2011, 22:23
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 329
|
UPDATE
This article gives the names of the 2 other people on board.
S V Quest
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|