|
|
22-10-2021, 19:19
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,252
|
40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
__________________
CRYA Yachtmaster Ocean Instructor Evaluator, Sail
IYT Yachtmaster Coastal Instructor
As I sail, I praise God, and care not. (Luke Foxe)
|
|
|
22-10-2021, 20:27
|
#2
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: aboard, in Tasmania, Australia
Boat: Sayer 46' Solent rig sloop
Posts: 28,527
|
Re: 40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
Maybe not "dumped", maybe "lost" -- at least until we know what failed. Just because "dumped" implies purposefully loosing them, and I'm pretty sure nobody wants to loose them in a culpable way. Pretty sure they fell away when something broke.
They're in an awful place, though, aren't they.
Reminds me of a conversation overheard on the HF radio one time. Soviet vessel (yes, it was a long time ago), deep bass voice, told us that they were a ship (unlike us, the tiny sailboat), and not afraid of the typhoon.
Ann
__________________
Who scorns the calm has forgotten the storm.
|
|
|
22-10-2021, 20:36
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,252
|
Re: 40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPA Cate
Maybe not "dumped", maybe "lost" -- at least until we know what failed. Just because "dumped" implies purposefully loosing them, and I'm pretty sure nobody wants to loose them in a culpable way. Pretty sure they fell away when something broke.
They're in an awful place, though, aren't they.
Reminds me of a conversation overheard on the HF radio one time. Soviet vessel (yes, it was a long time ago), deep bass voice, told us that they were a ship (unlike us, the tiny sailboat), and not afraid of the typhoon.
Ann
|
Lost is a better term than dumped.
__________________
CRYA Yachtmaster Ocean Instructor Evaluator, Sail
IYT Yachtmaster Coastal Instructor
As I sail, I praise God, and care not. (Luke Foxe)
|
|
|
22-10-2021, 21:12
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On Vessel WINGS, wherever there's an ocean, currently in Mexico
Boat: Serendipity 43
Posts: 5,508
|
Re: 40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPA Cate
Maybe not "dumped", maybe "lost" -- at least until we know what failed. Just because "dumped" implies purposefully loosing them, and I'm pretty sure nobody wants to loose them in a culpable way. Pretty sure they fell away when something broke.
They're in an awful place, though, aren't they.
Reminds me of a conversation overheard on the HF radio one time. Soviet vessel (yes, it was a long time ago), deep bass voice, told us that they were a ship (unlike us, the tiny sailboat), and not afraid of the typhoon.
Ann
|
Still, no mention of responsibility for any damage or loss of life that might occur if these containers are struck by any other vessel, particularly a small vessel.
Of course the reporter would be oblivious of that issue.
In my view the captain of the ship, the shipping company, and their insurers, should be required to post a performance bond, and the ship impounded until such bond is paid, against any subsequent damages caused (like $100 million).
Otherwise, "So sad, lost 40 containers, notify the insurers. Meanwhile we're off to pick up another load".
__________________
These lines upon my face tell you the story of who I am but these stories don't mean anything
when you've got no one to tell them to Fred Roswold Wings https://wingssail.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
22-10-2021, 23:10
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Boat: Fisher pilothouse sloop 32'
Posts: 3,420
|
Re: 40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
Quote:
Originally Posted by wingssail
Still, no mention of responsibility for any damage or loss of life that might occur if these containers are struck by any other vessel, particularly a small vessel.
Of course the reporter would be oblivious of that issue.
In my view the captain of the ship, the shipping company, and their insurers, should be required to post a performance bond, and the ship impounded until such bond is paid, against any subsequent damages caused (like $100 million).
Otherwise, "So sad, lost 40 containers, notify the insurers. Meanwhile we're off to pick up another load".
|
Out of curiosity, how would you feel about posting a bond prior to you venturing offshore, just in case you required assistance after encountering adverse weather that caused the loss of or damage to your vessel and possible damage or pollution to other vessels or infrastructure?.
As the saying goes, sometimes s**t happens.
As to impounding , a prudent ship owner would either up the prices for cartage or cease servicing that port, either way the precious imported product either becomes more expensive or extremely difficult to obtain, either way you and I shoulder the cost.
__________________
Rob aka Uncle Bob Sydney Australia.
Life is 10% the cards you are dealt, 90% how you play em
|
|
|
23-10-2021, 06:54
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On Vessel WINGS, wherever there's an ocean, currently in Mexico
Boat: Serendipity 43
Posts: 5,508
|
Re: 40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Bob
Out of curiosity, how would you feel about posting a bond prior to you venturing offshore, just in case you required assistance after encountering adverse weather that caused the loss of or damage to your vessel and possible damage or pollution to other vessels or infrastructure?.
As the saying goes, sometimes s**t happens.
As to impounding , a prudent ship owner would either up the prices for cartage or cease servicing that port, either way the precious imported product either becomes more expensive or extremely difficult to obtain, either way you and I shoulder the cost.
|
Apples to oranges, Uncle Bob, you're scenario takes place before the event.
YES, we should shoulder the cost of damages caused by the shipment of the goods we buy.
AND, I do feel it is entirely proper and just if I had to post a bond after my vessel goes ashore to ensure that I clean up the environmental or other damage it causes. In fact I am required to pay for the clean-up in that event, the shipper does not pay if a sailboat hits one of his lost containers and sinks. (Who knows?)
AND your justification is that such bond and impoundment would raise the cost of consumer goods, etc? Well, that is such a poor reason. You are saying that we should to ignore the potential cost or losses to other navigation in order to keep our consumer costs down. That is like saying we should let factories dump dangerous chemicals into rivers because it would make the cost of their manufactured goods more expensive to prevent it, and if it caused cancer or death to someone down stream, well, part of the cost of doing business.
As for saying that sometimes s**t happens? Containers fall off in heavy weather because they are not adequately secured or the ship is overloaded. It is tolerated because there is no penaltly and whomever gets hurt by hitting them won't likely live to tell the tale. Imposing a requirement to post a bond or pay a fine for arriving without all of your cargo would force shippers to do more to prevent it, and it THAT is the cost of shipping goods, so be it.
I don't get why we should allow shippers to get off the hook for possible damage their lost containers cause just to keep goods from China cheaper.
__________________
These lines upon my face tell you the story of who I am but these stories don't mean anything
when you've got no one to tell them to Fred Roswold Wings https://wingssail.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
23-10-2021, 07:27
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Channel Islands, CA
Boat: Jeanneau 41 DS
Posts: 559
|
Re: 40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
i am at a loss. in the 70s nixon administration secrettly retrieved a russian sub at great depths. we have huge cranes and tow ships and technology to deal with this. why cant we go out there retrieve these containers or sink them ...navy target practice...send the bill to the company with a surge charge? no pay...cant use our ports. what am my missing here ...what ? im sure most of these companies have parent companies that have deep pockets...charge them or will be a big tarriff or band you from bring yiur stuff over. we. need government with balls...we can afford to leave billions of military equiptment with our enemies in the middle east....but we cant take care of a few containers tgat can easily sink our boats and cause great harm...
imho
abe
|
|
|
23-10-2021, 07:57
|
#8
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 6,214
|
Re: 40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
Jack Dale said: "Lost is a better term than dumped."
Indeed! The CBC piece was careful in the choice of words. I see the words "lost" and "fell". Nowhere did I see the word "dumped".
Auntie CBS is one of the last strongholds of responsible journalism in this 'ere Colony. Let us give thanks :-)!
TP
|
|
|
23-10-2021, 10:28
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Skagit City, WA
Posts: 25,515
|
40 Containers overboard...
You shouldn't be sailing the West Coast right now anyway but, 40 containers overboard and floating...:
https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/app...BJuudpW-Jeiv2A
__________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Broads and Boats. The rest I wasted" - Elmore Leonard
|
|
|
23-10-2021, 21:09
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Portland,OR (W7TPH)
Boat: Cascade 42 Maria Victoria
Posts: 325
|
Re: 40 Containers overboard...
|
|
|
23-10-2021, 21:10
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Portland,OR (W7TPH)
Boat: Cascade 42 Maria Victoria
Posts: 325
|
40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
|
|
|
23-10-2021, 21:51
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Boat: Fisher pilothouse sloop 32'
Posts: 3,420
|
Re: 40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
Quote:
Originally Posted by wingssail
Apples to oranges, Uncle Bob, you're scenario takes place before the event.
YES, we should shoulder the cost of damages caused by the shipment of the goods we buy.
AND, I do feel it is entirely proper and just if I had to post a bond after my vessel goes ashore to ensure that I clean up the environmental or other damage it causes. In fact I am required to pay for the clean-up in that event, the shipper does not pay if a sailboat hits one of his lost containers and sinks. (Who knows?)
AND your justification is that such bond and impoundment would raise the cost of consumer goods, etc? Well, that is such a poor reason. You are saying that we should to ignore the potential cost or losses to other navigation in order to keep our consumer costs down. That is like saying we should let factories dump dangerous chemicals into rivers because it would make the cost of their manufactured goods more expensive to prevent it, and if it caused cancer or death to someone down stream, well, part of the cost of doing business.
As for saying that sometimes s**t happens? Containers fall off in heavy weather because they are not adequately secured or the ship is overloaded. It is tolerated because there is no penaltly and whomever gets hurt by hitting them won't likely live to tell the tale. Imposing a requirement to post a bond or pay a fine for arriving without all of your cargo would force shippers to do more to prevent it, and it THAT is the cost of shipping goods, so be it.
I don't get why we should allow shippers to get off the hook for possible damage their lost containers cause just to keep goods from China cheaper.
|
Where to start? Firstly goods are shipped all around the world using containers, not just from china and not just "cheap".
Penalising a ship operator because the ship is not strong enough to withstand any possible conditions it may encounter in its life is just beyond ridiculous, as it would be to demand that motor vehicles be built to withstand any possible accident.
Extreme weather regularly causes maritime losses and damage, has done for generations and will do for ever more.
Shipping is just like any other business, an operator endeavours to avoid and mitigate problems but sometimes s**t happens, always has and always will. Doesn't make it right but it is the reality. Would I be happy if I hit a stray container?, no of course not nor would I wish it on anyone but large financial imposts do little to mitigate the problem. To my mind the suggestion put forward by another poster that the port be closed to a problem ship operator is more likely to achieve a desirable outcome.
Still the fact remains that extreme weather often cannot be accurately predicted, not now and probably not in the foreseeable future.
__________________
Rob aka Uncle Bob Sydney Australia.
Life is 10% the cards you are dealt, 90% how you play em
|
|
|
24-10-2021, 03:01
|
#13
|
Senior Cruiser
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,394
|
Re: 40 Containers overboard...
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxsailordiver
|
The Canadian Coast Guard, and the Joint Rescue Coordination Centre (JRCC), in B.C., have evacuated 16 crew members, from a container ship, the MV “Zim Kingston”, anchored off Victoria, after a fire began spreading, in containers on board [not the ship, itself], Saturday.
The Coast Guard said “Zim Kingston” is carrying more than 52,000 kilograms of xanthates, which includes potassium amylxanthate [toxic & spontaneously combustible], housed in two of the containers that are on fire, aboard the ship.
The ship first ran into trouble Friday, when it lost 40 of its shipping containers in rough seas, 70 kilometres west of the Juan de Fuca Strait. The Canadian Coast Guard said it was working with its U.S. counterpart to track the 40 containers that had fallen overboard, saying they pose a significant risk to mariners. Late Saturday, the containers were about 22 kilometres off the west coast of Vancouver Island, near Bamfield.
More ➥ https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...fire-1.6222815
Video ➥ https://twitter.com/i/status/1452053806632476673
And ➥ https://twitter.com/hashtag/ZimKings...=hashtag_click
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"
|
|
|
24-10-2021, 10:12
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Skagit City, WA
Posts: 25,515
|
Re: 40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Bob
Where to start? Firstly goods are shipped all around the world using containers, not just from china and not just "cheap".
Penalising a ship operator because the ship is not strong enough to withstand any possible conditions it may encounter in its life is just beyond ridiculous, as it would be to demand that motor vehicles be built to withstand any possible accident.
Extreme weather regularly causes maritime losses and damage, has done for generations and will do for ever more.
Shipping is just like any other business, an operator endeavours to avoid and mitigate problems but sometimes s**t happens, always has and always will. Doesn't make it right but it is the reality. Would I be happy if I hit a stray container?, no of course not nor would I wish it on anyone but large financial imposts do little to mitigate the problem. To my mind the suggestion put forward by another poster that the port be closed to a problem ship operator is more likely to achieve a desirable outcome.
Still the fact remains that extreme weather often cannot be accurately predicted, not now and probably not in the foreseeable future.
|
I disagree, have you seen how high they stack the containers? It's poor seamanship at a minimum. And obviously they are not "secured". This may be a better example of your thinking:
__________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Broads and Boats. The rest I wasted" - Elmore Leonard
|
|
|
24-10-2021, 10:21
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston
Boat: ‘01 Catana 401
Posts: 9,626
|
Re: 40 containers dumped at mouth of Juan de Fuca
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheechako
I disagree, have you seen how high they stack the containers? It's poor seamanship at a minimum. And obviously they are not "secured". This may be a better example of your thinking:
|
I can’t imagine a ships master nor an underwriter allowing a voyage without following basic guidelines for container securement. There are literally volumes written about securing containers.
https://www.containerhandbuch.de/chb..._01_03_02.html
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|
|