|
|
27-06-2006, 23:12
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 864
|
The guy hanging over my head here (KN) is right. Yacht indicates private ownership/pleasurecraft. Socio-economic considerations do not apply, though they are difficult to jettison from our thoughts.
So:
Mulit-million dollar cabin cruiser, with pretentious martini-swilling owner wearing blue blazer and white cap? Yacht.
15' West Wight Potter with a 2hp British Seagull, no standing headroom, an ice chest and a porta-potti, gunk-holing while its trailer waits in the parking lot next to the launch ramp? Yacht.
My mind wants to exclude open daysailers, because I see some type of cabin/accomodation as necessary to earn the yacht moniker. But technically, that might not be necessary.
Dang: now I have to modify my signature…
__________________
s/y Elizabeth— Catalina 34 MkII
"Man must have just enough faith in himself to have adventures, and just enough doubt of himself to enjoy them." — G. K. Chesterfield
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 00:23
|
#17
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would think there is a provision to indicate ocean going vessels, but I have never seen it. I took allot of crap when I started refering to my boats as S/Y's. People thought I was being pretentios, but I was just trying to be linguistically correct. I finally gave up and went with the flow
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 00:47
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philippines in the winters
Boat: It’s in French Polynesia now
Posts: 11,372
|
I get it!
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 01:32
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 864
|
No, that's just the common wisdom.
__________________
s/y Elizabeth— Catalina 34 MkII
"Man must have just enough faith in himself to have adventures, and just enough doubt of himself to enjoy them." — G. K. Chesterfield
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 10:41
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 192
|
Different usage in Uk compared to USA.
In UK, common (sailing) usage would have 3 classes: dinghy, dayboat/keelboat, yacht. A yacht having ballast and some sort of cabin, but could be any size/price. No pretensions implied. The name 'sailboat' is not used much. Of course a cat has no ballast but I think one with accomodation would be yacht too?
Motorboats: I have no idea and don't care.
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 13:01
|
#21
|
Senior Cruiser
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marlborough Sounds. New Zealand
Boat: Hartley Tahitian 45ft. Leisure Lady
Posts: 8,038
|
__________________
Wheels
For God so loved the world..........He didn't send a committee.
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 13:53
|
#22
|
cruiser
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: No longer post here
Boat: Catalac Catamaran
Posts: 2,462
|
When I'm speaking of my vessel.... it's my boat.
When others speak about it...... 'his yacht'
Rick in Florida
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 15:00
|
#23
|
Senior Cruiser
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Macatawa Michigan
Boat: Amanda Faye 61' Custom Irwin aftcockpit ketch
Posts: 1,415
|
I have a boat. It is 68' LOA, I have always thought of it as a boat.
__________________
Gunner
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 15:58
|
#24
|
cruiser
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,525
|
Gunner... you might be pushing the envelope...
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 18:43
|
#25
|
Senior Cruiser
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Macatawa Michigan
Boat: Amanda Faye 61' Custom Irwin aftcockpit ketch
Posts: 1,415
|
I can't help it. Everytime that I have said something like "lets go check on the yacht" I have always felt stupid. I have a boat, maybe if it takes a few paid people to handle a vessel then it may be a yacht.
__________________
Gunner
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 19:59
|
#26
|
Senior Cruiser
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marlborough Sounds. New Zealand
Boat: Hartley Tahitian 45ft. Leisure Lady
Posts: 8,038
|
Hey come to think of it, I am exactly the same. If I said to Dawn, lets go check on the Yacht, it sounds totaly pretentiouse. I would say lets go check the boat. Or I on own a boat, it's a yacht. I don't say, I own a yacht. But if two differing tyoes are in the marina and I was telling someone that didn't know anything about boats, I would say, that ones a yacht and that ones a launch.
I know Technicaly as in wikipedia there is a description, but it is interesting now, that it looks like the term is used as loosly and as compicatedly to fit what ever way we are speaking, all over the world. How fasinating.
__________________
Wheels
For God so loved the world..........He didn't send a committee.
|
|
|
28-06-2006, 20:04
|
#27
|
Senior Cruiser
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Macatawa Michigan
Boat: Amanda Faye 61' Custom Irwin aftcockpit ketch
Posts: 1,415
|
Also, I think a yacht must be paid off. If it is not then it is a liability and not a care free pleasure to own.
__________________
Gunner
|
|
|
29-06-2006, 02:34
|
#28
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Boat: Hartley 32 RORC; Vixen
Posts: 193
|
What is It??
* Mast & sails for propulsion, open and no accomodation, galley etc = sailboat or dinghy (dinghy usually under 16' long)
* Mast & sails for propulsion, accomodation, galley etc, maybe an outboard and trailed to and from water = Trailer Sailer
* Mast & sails for propulsion, accomodation, galley, head, alternative propulsion from inboard diesel or perhaps outboard = yacht
If it doesn't have a mast & sails it has no right to be called a yacht!
|
|
|
29-06-2006, 08:53
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 864
|
And If My Grandmother Had Wheels, She'd Be a Wagon
I hate to begin street-fighting with dictionaires, but from Webster's New Collegiate: yacht: any of various relativey small sailing or mechanically driven ships that characteristically have a sharp prow and graceful lines and which are ordinarily used for pleasure cruising or racing. Well, seems as if the term is a bit broader than most of us would want to allow. It's the type of use that seems to be central here.
Trailer-sailing is exclusively a 20th & 21st Century phenomenon. Two generations ago, the term yacht would have been applied to these small, privately-owned sailboats, so there is no reason to exclude them now based on the manner in which they are launched & stored. There's no logic there.
Technically, open boats qualify, though I think many of us would to see some type of accomodation before we called it a proper yacht. I admit that is a qualification Webster doesn't mention.
They're called auxilliary engines for a reason: the existence of an auxilliary on a sailing craft doesn't disqualify it. There are men (and I know of at least one on this board) who remove their engines, but we can't say that their vessels are then neutered, and cannot be called yachts. A hundred years ago, there where no engines, but there were yachts.
Quote:
If it doesn't have a mast & sails it has no right to be called a yacht!
|
Sorry, Steve, by Webster's definition, those motor-launches qualify as yachts, despite your very persuasive exclamation point.
The Navy's terms have to be seen as a specialized Jargon, and apt to confuse everyday understanding.
__________________
s/y Elizabeth— Catalina 34 MkII
"Man must have just enough faith in himself to have adventures, and just enough doubt of himself to enjoy them." — G. K. Chesterfield
|
|
|
29-06-2006, 10:08
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brighton, UK
Boat: Privilege 37
Posts: 3,753
|
It is no good quoting a definition and pretending that that closes the argument. There are probably another 5 different definitions that prove otherwise.
Personally I dont give a monkey what you want to call yours. Mine is a yacht.
__________________
"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors - and miss."
Robert A Heinlein
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Advertise Here
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|
|
|