 |
|
21-01-2018, 12:47
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Montreal
Boat: C&C 30MK1 And charter boats. IWT World keelboat instructor.
Posts: 402
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simi 60
The speed was to fast to avoid collision with the lookouts they had.
Thats the easy answer. Who hit who?
From the pictures it looks like the impact was from the side. Port side.
Maybe the fishing boat was the one going to fast or that maneuvered into Vestas?
Maybe Vestas was almost stoped when they got hit by the fishing boat.
Maybe Vestas saw the boat and tried to turn but was unable to avoid the collision.
Was Vestas aware at all that there was a boat near them? Was the fishing boat visible on radar or by the naked eye?.
So many unknowns here.
A safe speed would be the one where they could, with adequate lookouts, avoid collision.
|
Then again who hit who?
They say that Vestas was involved in a collision with a fishing boat. Not the Vestas hit a fishing boat.
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 13:00
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: New Zealand
Boat: Moana 33
Posts: 1,105
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seasick
... Regarding a safe speed: In a race like the VOR there is only flat out...
|
No, this is absolutely wrong.
No race is worth dying for. Going fishing for a living is always one of the most hazardous occupations but being killed by some supersonic yacht dodging through a 'fleet of poorly lit fishing boats' at warp speed - that's not on. That's not sailing. That's not sport. That's not seamanship.
I totally dissociate myself from that viewpoint. No excuses please.
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 13:00
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Australia
Boat: Milkraft 60 ex trawler
Posts: 4,651
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seasick
Just spoke to my brother whose daughter was behind Vestas, on MAPFRE. The fleet of fishing vessels, gillnetters, were all poorly lit. Most carried a single kerosine lamp at their mast head. Regarding a safe speed: In a race like the VOR there is only flat out.
.
|
The very definition of poor seamanship.
They knew there were hazards - they chose to ignore those hazards - a life was lost.
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 13:17
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Hammond, IN
Boat: Columbia 8.7
Posts: 292
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
Sailing seems like the only kind of racing where non competitors are allowed on the race course. I don't know if it's practicable to expect anyone racing to deliberately slow down. The solutions I can think of are: not allowing the racing near busy harbors, the authorities clearing the course or somehow handicapping the boats to compel slower speeds, perhaps by not allowing them to use their full compliment of sails.
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 14:03
|
#20
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: La Ciudad de la Misión Didacus de Alcalá en Alta California, Virreinato de Nueva España
Boat: Cal 20
Posts: 21,996
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
You have that backwards, sailing is one of the few sports that races mostly in the public right of way rather than on a separated course.
__________________
Num Me Vexo?
For all of your celestial navigation questions: https://navlist.net/
A house is but a boat so poorly built and so firmly run aground no one would think to try and refloat it.
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 14:12
|
#21
|
Senior Cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 31,514
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adelie
You have that backwards, sailing is one of the few sports that races mostly in the public right of way rather than on a separated course.
|
A+1..
__________________

You can't abuse and dispossess a people for so many decades and have them say.. "I Love You.. ".
"It is better to die standing proud, than to live a lifetime on ones knees.."
Alleged Self Defence is no justification for Genocide...
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 14:45
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Hammond, IN
Boat: Columbia 8.7
Posts: 292
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
That's exactly what I said?
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 15:07
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Boat: Brewer designed Pacific 43 in fiberglass. Center cockpit set up for long-distance single handing.
Posts: 472
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
Scant information available online. My niece Sofie on Mapfre said that they had two bow watchers at the mast to see under the Code Zero and the navigator was on lookout as well with an iPad mirroring the B&G radar screen below decks.
The photo of the steel vessel in the article supplied by IslandHopper (thank you IslandHopper) was a vessel the survivors were rescued to. The smaller fishing vessel had by this time gone to the bottom.
In many of the other VOR ports of call during the history of this race, marine exclusionary zones have been set up to afford a lane of safe passage for the VOR Fleet. Apparently this zone was not established in Hong Kong one of the busiest ports on earth.
Having survived a horrific collision on the water, I sympathize a great deal with all those involved. My heart goes out.
This screen shot of the VOR Tracker (courtesy of SailingIllustrated) shows Vestas’ track before and after the collision as her crew frantically tried to douse sails cant the keel to get her hole out of the sea and to assist the other vessel.
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 15:12
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Boat: Brewer designed Pacific 43 in fiberglass. Center cockpit set up for long-distance single handing.
Posts: 472
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
https://www.sailingillustrated.com
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 15:22
|
#25
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Location: cruising SW Pacific
Boat: Jon Sayer 1-off 46 ft fract rig sloop strip plank in W Red Cedar
Posts: 21,728
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
This incident makes me wonder when one of the big multihull RTW solo boats will have a similar collision. I'm not opposed to solo racing in general... have done so myself... but not in 100+ foot boats going 30+ knots. If one of these vessels with no one on watch some f the time should collide with even pretty a substantial craft the outcome could be awful.
Mostly these guys are not in congested waters, and that sure improves the odds, but one finds ships, cruising yachts and fishermen in the damndest places. It's a worry...
Jim
__________________
Jim and Ann s/v Insatiable II, lying Port Cygnet Tasmania once again.
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 15:37
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Back in the boat in Patagonia
Boat: Westerly Sealord
Posts: 8,517
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
I seem to recall a single handed RTW several years ago... started in France.... 2 or maybe more of the yachts managed to run into *big* boats engaged in fishing before they cleared Biscay....
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 16:22
|
#27
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: BVI
Boat: Leopard 40 (new model)
Posts: 1,390
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boatguy30
Is there any info yet on which was burdened vessel in terms of right of way?
|
There is no such a thing as right of way when one of the boats is not a sailing boat.
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 16:27
|
#28
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Back in the boat in Patagonia
Boat: Westerly Sealord
Posts: 8,517
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by svlamorocha
There is no such a thing as right of way when one of the boats is not a sailing boat.
|
¿Qué?
Putting the 'right of way' bit to one side - and leaving it there - I suggest you take a look at Rule 18.
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 16:34
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Back in the boat in Patagonia
Boat: Westerly Sealord
Posts: 8,517
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Centreboard2017
I understand that the fishing vessel was unlit.
|
Where exactly did you glean that info from?
|
|
|
21-01-2018, 16:42
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Australia
Boat: Milkraft 60 ex trawler
Posts: 4,651
|
Re: VOR boat in Fatal Collision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pinguino
¿Qué?
Putting the 'right of way' bit to one side - and leaving it there - I suggest you take a look at Rule 18.
|
And everyone should revisit rule 5 and 6 while there.
|
|
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor Spotlight |
|
|
|