Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike OReilly
It seems to me that one of the key factors in living inexpensively comes back to the old adage: Location, location, location...
|
I agree.
For example, in wellington
new zealand it cost me nothing to live because there was plenty of food freely available. The same was true in
san francisco. But when I travel to a different port, I either didn't find the source, or it wasn't possible to get this.
In
remote regions I can catch
fish and hunt wild
animals. At sea I can catch far more than I can eat so it's possible to have extra food for when I am anchored somewhere.
In countries like
vanuatu, I needed no
money because there, I could also hunt and
fish with the locals, but also barter with them, and bring them from one island to the next which they often paid me with food from their gardens.
In
philippines I found I needed
money, but there I could eat a meal with meat, vegetables, soup, fruit and rice for less than $1, and it was enough food for the whole day.
Here in mauritius, it can cost me $1 also for food for one day when I am not
cooking, but
cooking food doesn't save a lot because cooking for one person is not so economical anyway. It can be a little cheaper but doesn't taste as good and it's a lot of effort.
Quote:
I've read that the Andaman Sea/Gulf of Thailand is an inviting place for cruisers. It is (apparently) an inexpensive place to live, but it is open and inviting to sailors. Is this your experience boat_alexandra? Please do tell us more.
|
I think
thailand is relatively
cheap, but also consider it's
asia so it's very polluted lots of trash everywhere, with too many people etc etc. Another problem with these places of +- 15 latitude is they are incredibly hot in the day especially in the rainy season making it almost impossible to do anything or to even think straight between 10am and 4pm.