Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaworthy Lass
StuM did find online instructions in English on this Australian site though:
|
That's a pretty conventional tuck splice - it is a good splice - it is not sensitive to small variations, so quite hard to mess up the strength.
The A3 is like a long splice, but for 8 and 12 braid. That is you lay out strands in the working part of the
rope and then lay in strands from the loop in their place. So the 'splice' is close to the same diameter as the working part of the rope. It is very elegant, and if you like rope
work one of those you see and say to yourself 'how did they do that'.
The reason for it's development is that when you are dealing with ship and
oil rig size lines (like starting at 4" diameters and up to +12" diameter) the tuck splice starts to get heavy and bulky for the crew to manhandle, and the A3 eliminates that extra bulk without sacrificing strength.
The only place I can see it really useful on a yacht is if you need to bring the loop right up to a sheave, and the tuck bulk would jam in the sheave. Otherwise it is very attractive and elegant but not really worth the effort.
PS1: The reason the normal bury splice is not commonly suggested with the
commercial 12 strand ropes is that the tuck uses less rope (you dont need a 62 or 72x bury), and when you get into larger ship/oil rig sizes saving some feet of rope is worth an extra 15 minutes of splice time.
PS2: oh yea, the difference between the new and old rope elasticity in that graph is mostly the constructional stretch being pulled out. That happens with all rope to some extent but more with ropes that have fibers braided at high angles to the load and less for ropes that have fibers that are near parallel to the load. It usually has less to do with actual changes in the fibers themselves, except that Polypro does change (rather more than other fibers) internally with use/age. I don't know where this high tenacity Polyolefin falls on that 'aging' spectrum, never see fiber level data on it, but probably somewhere better than polypro but less than the polyester.